Research Paper
ENGL 300
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
||||
|
Content |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
Points Earned |
|
Substance of Analysis/Evaluation |
54 to 60 points Sophisticated, insightful analysis and evaluation; well-developed and deftly presented argument |
42 to 53 points Good analysis and evaluation; solid presentation of analysis and helpful evaluation of material |
1 to 41 points Weak to poor analysis or evaluation; not particularly well supported |
0 points Missing or unacceptable analysis or evaluation |
|
|
Organization of Research and Analysis |
45 to 50 points Research and assessment/analysis is developed effectively, with a clear setup in introduction and wrap-up in conclusion; paragraphs are well unified and coherent, headed by strong topic sentences; paragraphs are well connected through transitions and are arranged in a logical manner |
35 to 44 points Overview of research and assessment/analysis is arranged so that readers can follow argument; one element might need to be strengthened (such as introduction or conclusion, transitions, or topic sentences); paragraphs are coherent and unified |
1 to 34 points Research or individual assessment/analysis undercuts argument—whether missing introduction or conclusion, unclear connections between ideas, paragraphs not well unified or coherent, or topic sentences missing |
0 points No clear organization plan |
|
|
Clarity of Voice |
33 to 37 point Research argument is supported by clear communication; strong, engaging sentences; and precise word choice throughout |
26 to 32 points Research argument is conveyed by logically constructed sentences; they may not be as engaging as those that earn the “advanced” rating |
1 to 25 points Ideas are undermined by unclear communication (either in the sentence structure or unclear or weak word choice) |
0 points Opaque, extremely difficult to follow |
|
|
Structure |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
Points Earned |
|
Grammar and Mechanics |
32 to 35 points Rare grammar errors or stylistic flaws |
25 to 31 points Some minor grammar issues |
1 to 24 points A range from minor grammar errors that occur throughout paper to major errors (score depends on level of grammar errors present) |
0 points Egregious grammar errors that mar most sentences |
|
|
Documentation |
25 to 28 points Perfectly cited material (both in-text documentation and Works Cited entry) |
20 to 24 points Mostly correct citations (in-text documentation and Works Cited); may have some minor errors |
1 to 19 points Poor citations (citations are attempted, but major errors in either punctuation or format) |
0 points No documentation (in-text citations or Works Cited) |
|
|
Total |
/210 |
||||
|
Instructor's Comments: |
Page 2 of 2