Powerpoint

Research Methodology Presentation Grading Rubric

Criteria Levels of Achievement Content 70% (122 points)

Advanced 94-100% (A) Proficient 87-93% (B) Developing 1-86% (< C) Not present

Content: Introduction, Literature Review

VA-LIBEDU-EDS- EDD.PST.B7

VA-LU-LO.PST.A3

49 to 52 points Key points concisely summarized with

balance, clarity and relevance.

45 to 48 points Most key points summarized with clarity

and relevance.

1 to 44 points While some key points are addressed, there is a lack of focus and important

information is neglected.

0 points

Research Design

VA-LIBEDU-EDS- EDD.PST.B8

VA-LU-LO.PST.A, VA-LU-

LO.PST.A1, VA- LU-LO.PST.A2

32 to 35 points A research design and theoretical framework are proposed that are relevant to the research topic and research questions. Appropriate references are provided to justify

methodological choices.

30 to 31 points A sound research design and theoretical framework are proposed, but alignment

between these elements and the research topics is not clear. Some references are provided to justify

methodological choices, but more are needed.

1 to 29 points A research design and theoretical

framework are proposed but they are not appropriate to the research topic and

research questions. Few or no references are provided to justify methodological

choices.

0 points

Data Collection And Analysis

VA-LIBEDU-EDS- EDD.PST.A1 VA- LU-LO.PST.A, VA- LU-LO.PST.A1,

VA-LU- LO.PST.A2, VA- LU-LO.PST.A3

32 to 35 points Sound data collection and data analysis strategies are proposed that are appropriate to the stated research design. Appropriate references are provided to justify the proposed data collection and analysis strategies. Includes all 5 of the following: • Discussion of Method • Validity/Reliability (Quantitative Designs OR Trustworthiness (Qualitative Designs) • Population/Samples (To include demonstration of Social responsibility [SCRIP] by including

30 to 31 points Sound data collection and data analysis strategies are proposed but alignment between these elements and the stated research design is not clear. Some references are provided to justify the proposed data collection and analysis strategies, but more are needed. Includes 3-4 of the following: • Discussion of Method • Validity/Reliability (Quantitative Designs OR Trustworthiness (Qualitative Designs) • Population/Samples

1 to 29 points Data collection and data analysis strategies are proposed but are not appropriate to the stated research design. Few or no references are provided to justify the proposed data collection and analysis strategies. Includes 1-2 of the following: • Discussion of Method • Validity/Reliability (Quantitative Designs OR Trustworthiness (Qualitative Designs) • Population/Samples (To include demonstration of Social responsibility [SCRIP] by including sampling strategy, desired sample size, and steps

0 points

sampling strategy, desired sample size, and steps taken to ensure as diverse a sample as possible for the topic) • Discussion of Chosen Statistical Analysis (Quantitative) OR Qualitative Data Analysis Strategy (Qualitative) • Discussion of Selected Research Design (i.e. Experimental, Quasi- Experimental, Correlational, Causal- Comparative, Qualitative Phenomenology, Qualitative Case Study, Qualitative Ethnography)

(To include demonstration of Social responsibility [SCRIP] by including sampling strategy, desired sample size, and steps taken to ensure as diverse a sample as possible for the topic) • Discussion of Chosen Statistical Analysis (Quantitative) OR Qualitative Data Analysis Strategy (Qualitative) • Discussion of Selected Research Design (i.e. Experimental, Quasi-Experimental, Correlational, Causal-Comparative, Qualitative Phenomenology, Qualitative Case Study, Qualitative Ethnography)

taken to ensure as diverse a sample as possible for the topic) • Discussion of Chosen Statistical Analysis (Quantitative) OR Qualitative Data Analysis Strategy (Qualitative) • Discussion of Selected Research Design (i.e. Experimental, Quasi-Experimental, Correlational, Causal-Comparative, Qualitative Phenomenology, Qualitative Case Study, Qualitative Ethnography)

Structure 30% (53 points)

Advanced 94-100% (A) Proficient 87-93% (B) Developing 1-86% (< C) Not present

Sentence Structure

VA-LIBEDU-EDS- EDD.PST.B2

VA-LU-LO.PST.B4

9 to 10 points Sentences are well-phrased and varied

in length and structure. Writing displays concise, interesting and

focused introductory and concluding sentences.

7 to 8 points Sentences are well-phrased and there is some variety in length and structure. Writing displays clear introductory and

concluding sentences.

1 to 6 points Some sentences are awkwardly constructed so that the reader is

occasionally distracted. Writing displays vague introductory and concluding

sentence.

0 points

Mechanics and APA Format

VA-LIBEDU-EDS- EDD.PST.B2

VA-LU-LO.PST.B4

30 to 33 points The writing is free of errors.

28 to 29 points There are few (1-3) errors, but they do not represent a major distraction or

obscure meaning.

1 to 27 points The writing has many errors.

0 points

Slide Elements And Design

VA-LIBEDU-EDS- EDD.PST.B2

VA-LU- LO.PST.B4, VA- LU-LO.PST.B7

9 to 10 points The slides are visually interesting. Numerous uses of graphics, images, pictures, charts, animation, or sound. No typos. Selected font style and color

are easy to read against slide background color.

7 to 8 points Most slides read with ease and include pertinent information. Limited use of graphics, images, pictures, charts,

animation, or sound. Appropriate text and slides for purpose.

1 to 6 points Difficult to read, too much information on slide. Few or no use of graphics, images, pictures, charts, animation, or sound.

Numerous typos.

0 points