Dissertation Topic: The change in Post-Covid Era for Costumes Textiles Supply Chain
RES 721
Building the Dissertation Prospectus
Syllabus
Table of Contents
Course Description
CLA Linking Table 5
Activity Assignments Linking Table 5
DQ Linking Table 5
Detailed Course Outline 9
1. Week 1: Preparation and Introduction to Problem Background 9
2. Week 2: Problem Background 11
3. Week 3: Problem Statement and Purpose of the Study 13
4. Week 4: Theoretical and/Conceptual Framework and Research Questions 15
5. Week 5: Nature of the Study 17
6. Week 6: Significance 18
7. Week 7: Draft of Prospectus 19
8. Week 8: Final Prospectus and Prospectus Presentation 20
Appendix 1: Create a Bibliography, Citations, and References in Microsoft Word 21
Appendix 2: Week 2 Peer-Reviewed Articles 27
Course Description
Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs Linked to Program Outcomes
Learning outcomes are statements that describe significant and essential learning that learners have achieved and can reliably demonstrate at the end of the course. Learning outcomes identify what the learner will know and be able to do by the end of a course – the essential and enduring knowledge, abilities (skills) and attitudes (values, dispositions) that constitute the integrated learning needed by a graduate of this course. The learning outcomes for this course summarize what you can expect to learn, and how this course is tied directly to the educational outcomes of the doctoral degree.
CLA Linking Table
Comprehensive Learning Assessments (CLAs), Professional Assessments (PAs) and Discussion Questions (DQs) directly measure Course Learning Outcomes and indirectly measure DBA Program Outcomes. The following table shows how all those are linked together.
|
Comprehensive Learning Assessment (The Prospectus) |
Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) |
Doctoral Program Outcomes |
|
Draft of the Prospectus (Week 7) |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
Final Prospectus (Week 8) |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Activity Assignments Linking Table
|
Activity |
Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) |
Doctoral Program Outcomes |
|
Activity 1
|
1, 10 |
1, 2, 7 |
|
Activity 2
|
2, 10 |
1, 2, 5, 7 |
|
Activity 3
|
3, 4, 10 |
1, 2, 3, 7, 8 |
|
Activity 4
|
5, 6, 10 |
1, 2, 3, 7, 9, 10 |
|
Activity 5
|
7, 10 |
1, 2, 6, 7 |
|
Activity 6
|
8, 9, 10 |
1, 2, 4, 7 |
DQ Linking Table
|
Discussion Questions (DQs) |
Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) |
Doctoral Program Outcomes |
|
DQ 1 (Week 1)
|
1, 10 |
1, 2, 7 |
|
DQ 2 (Week 2)
|
2, 10 |
1, 2, 5, 7 |
|
DQ 3 (Week 3)
|
3, 4, 10 |
1, 2, 3, 7, 8 |
|
DQ 4 (Week 4)
|
5, 6, 10 |
1, 2, 3, 7, 9, 10 |
|
DQ 5 (Week 5)
|
7, 10 |
1, 2, 6, 7 |
|
DQ 6 (Week 6)
|
8, 9, 10 |
1, 2, 4, 7 |
Rubrics
GRADING METRICS FOR WEEKLY ACTIVITIES
|
Activity Assignment Rubrics |
|||||
|
|
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Needs Improvement |
Failing |
Possible points |
|
Assignment Components |
|||||
|
Activity Completion |
Fulfilled all that was required by the activity. |
Partially fulfilled what was required by the activity |
Did not fulfilled any of that which was required by the activity |
The student did not submit or submitted unacceptable and/or irrelevant document |
|
|
|
40 |
35 |
30 |
0 |
40 |
|
Research Components |
|||||
|
Effective Research |
The student is uses scholarly sources to support his or her argument(s) |
The student uses some scholarly sources, but not entirely. |
The student does not use scholarly sources. |
The student did not submit or submitted unacceptable and/or irrelevant document |
|
|
|
35 |
30 |
25 |
0 |
35 |
|
Writing Components |
|||||
|
Formatting |
The paper follows all APA formatting guidelines, free of spelling and grammar errors. |
The paper follows all APA formatting guidelines, but there are some spelling and grammar errors. |
The paper follows not all APA formatting guidelines, and there are some spelling and grammar errors. |
The student did not submit or submitted unacceptable and/or irrelevant document |
|
|
|
15 |
12 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
|
Accountability |
|||||
|
Timeliness |
Submitted on time |
Submitted 1 day late |
Submitted 2 days late |
Submitted more than 2 days late or not submitted |
|
|
|
10 |
8 |
6 |
0 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total points earned |
100 |
GRADING METRICS FOR PROSPECTUS
Rubrics
GRADING METRICS FOR WEEKLY DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
Rubrics
GRADING METRICS FOR PRESENTATION
|
|
Exemplary 10-9 |
Accomplished 8-6 |
Developing 5-3 |
Beginning 2-0 |
|
of Presentation |
Information presented in logical, interesting sequence |
Information in logical sequence |
Difficult to follow presentation--student jumps around |
Cannot understand presentation--no sequence of information |
|
Subject-Matter Knowledge |
Demonstrates full knowledge by answering all class questions with explanations and elaborations |
At ease with expected answers to questions but does not elaborate |
Uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions |
Does not have a grasp of the information. Cannot answer questions about subject |
|
Graphics and/or Graphical Representation of Concepts |
Explain and reinforce screen text and presentation |
Relate to text and presentation |
Occasionally uses graphics that rarely support text and presentation |
Uses superfluous graphics or no graphics |
|
Research as supporting evidence for justification of conclusions |
Uses a variety of sources in reaching accurate and detailed conclusions that solidify premise. Use of examples are included that connect research with concepts. |
Uses a variety of sources in reaching conclusions that support the premise. Some example(s) are used to justify arguments. |
Presents only evidence that supports a preconceived point of view and attempts to compare and contrast varying viewpoints. |
Does not justify conclusions with research evidence. Conclusions are solely based upon textbook and/or personal analysis. |
|
Critical Thinking Idea Formation |
Examines conclusions; Uses reasonable judgment; Discriminates rationally; Synthesizes data; Views all information critically and provides logical presentation of facts as the premise for analysis and critical thinking. |
Formulates conclusions; Recognizes arguments; Notices differences in arguments; Evaluates data; Seeks out information and attempts to form conclusions and present ideas as demonstrated by analysis and critical thinking.
|
Arguments and/or conclusions provided partially; Identifies some differences;
Assumes information is valid and only provides some analysis and critical thinking based only on this information. |
Fails to draw conclusions; No identification of arguments; Overlooks differences; Repeats data; Omit any research and the basis of analysis is limited to textbooks and there is a lack of critical thinking and idea formation. |
|
Oral Presentation Eye Contact Verbal Tone/Speed |
Maintains eye contact and pronounces all terms precisely. All audience members can hear and follow the presentation. |
Maintains eye contact most of the time and pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear the presentation and follow along. |
Occasionally uses eye contact, mostly reading presentations, and incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing and flowing along. |
Reads with no eye contact and incorrectly pronounces terms. Speaks too quietly |
RES 721 Syllabus
Page of
Detailed Course Outline
The following outline provides important assignment details for this course, week by week. You are responsible for all of the assignments given. Please refer to the Detailed Description of Each Grading Criteria beginning in the syllabus for specific information about each assignment.
1.
Week 1: Preparation and Introduction to Problem Background
Assignments to complete this week:
· Reading: American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
· Chapter 1: Scholarly Writing and Publishing Principles
· Reading: Creswell & Creswell (5th ed.)
· Chapter 1: The Selection of a Research Approach
· Reading
· Evaluating Internet Research Sources – http://www.virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.htm
· Citations and Automated Reference List in Microsoft Word: Appendix 1. Please note to make sure that the generated reference list is APA 7th edition formatted
· DQ Answers by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m.
· Post DQ Peer Responses by Saturday at 11:59 p.m.
· Activity 1 due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m.
Each week, students must post one (1) initial posting and one (1) peer response for every discussion question.
Each week you will write and submit a section of your prospectus which should include peer-reviewed references cited within the text in response to the assigned activities and discussion questions. The instructor will provide feedback, suggestions, and sometimes questions to focus your thinking or critique to improve your writing.
You are required to use Microsoft Word tools, including automated features, to generate a document containing in-text citations and a references list, which should be in the latest version of APA style. Table of contents, list of figures, list of tables, and list of appendices, whichever required, should be created by using automated features.
Discussion Question 1 - CLO 1, CLO 10
Using your textbook, LIRN-based research, and the Internet, respond to the following question:
· Identify the field in which you are interested in doing your potential dissertation research. Explain the aspects of this field that attract your attention.
In addition to the textbook, include a minimum of two (2) scholarly references and cite them within the text of your discussion.
Respond to at least one peer enhancing the collaborative learning environment.
Activity 1 - CLO 1, CLO 10
Many times, students choose topics that are too broad to be consistent with the timeframe and the capacity of the student for completing the dissertation.
· Please provide a detailed description of the topic that you chose for your potential dissertation and its connection to the field that you mentioned in answering this week’s discussion question.
Note that the chosen topic may be refined in the assignments in the subsequent weeks.
Please provide, in addition to the textbook, a minimum of two (2) scholarly references and cite them within the text of your activity.
Please see Grading Rubrics for Discussions, Activities, Final Prospectus and Prospectus presentation on pages 6-9 of the syllabus.
2. Week 2: Problem Background
Assignments to complete this week:
· Reading: American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
· Chapter 2: Paper Elements and Format
· Reading: Creswell & Creswell (5th ed.)
· Chapter 2: Review of the Literature
· Post DQ Answers by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m.
· Post DQ Peer Responses by Saturday at 11:59 p.m.
· Activity 2 due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m.
Each week, students must post one (1) initial posting and one (1) peer response for every discussion question. Please see Grading Criteria for Discussion Board Participation on pages 8-9 of the syllabus for Discussion Questions and Response expectations.
Each week you will write and submit a section of your prospectus which should include peer-reviewed references cited within the text in response to the assigned activities and discussion questions. The instructor will provide feedback, suggestions, and sometimes questions to focus your thinking or critique to improve your writing.
Discussion Question 2 - CLO 2, CLO 10
Consider the following prompt and compose your response post with supporting examples:
Please examine the literature review section of one of the peer-reviewed articles listed in Appendix 2 (available on GAP under “Supplemental Material” folder) or other scholarly article of your choice that could intrigue your interest for the topic of your dissertation. Then discuss how did the author(s):
· Compare and contrast each source to other relevant literature on the topic?
· Argue, or provide evidence, that each source contributes to the body of knowledge about the topic?
· Synthesize the ideas to assess the state of knowledge on the topic, and identify the existing gap?
Please note you may use your selected article as one of the articles for activity 2.
In addition to the textbook, include a minimum of two (2) scholarly references and cite them within the text of your discussion.
Respond to at least one peer enhancing the collaborative learning environment.
Activity 2 - CLO 2, CLO 10
Background of the Study: Practice developing the background section of your potential prospectus by providing the following:
· Review resources within the field you have chosen for your research, find at least three (3) recently published resources that support/justify a current and relevant problem in your discipline or professional field and critically analyze each of the resources. Include evidence that provides the justification for your potential research problem by (a) an in-text citation; (b) what problem was studied; (c) the findings of the study; (d) why this research is important in relation to your study; and (e) include a statement that summarizes prior research done on your potential topic and the need for your proposed research.
Please provide, in addition to the textbook, a minimum of two (2) scholarly references and cite them within the text of your activity.
Please see Grading Rubrics for Discussions, Activities, Final Prospectus and Prospectus presentation on pages 6-9 of the syllabus.
3. Week 3: Problem Statement and Purpose of the Study
Assignments to complete this week:
· Reading: American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
· Chapter 4: Writing Style and Grammar
· Chapter 5: Bias-Free Language Guidelines
· Reading: Creswell & Creswell (5th ed.)
· Chapter 5: The Introduction
· Chapter 6: The Purpose Statement
· Post DQ Answers by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m.
· Post DQ Peer Responses by Saturday at 11:59 p.m.
· Activity 3 is due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m.
Each week, students must post one (1) initial posting and one (1) peer response for every discussion question. Please see Grading Criteria for Discussion Board Participation on pages 8-9 of the syllabus for Discussion Questions and Response expectations.
Each week you will write and submit a section of your prospectus which should include peer-reviewed references cited within the text in response to the assigned activities and discussion questions. The instructor will provide feedback, suggestions, and sometimes questions to focus your thinking or critique to improve your writing.
Discussion Question 3 - CLO 3, CLO 4, CLO 10
Use the article you chose in the Week 2 Discussion and describe the following:
· The problem stated in the article
· The purpose of the study
· Alignment of the purpose with the identified problem
Please note that some of the papers you read may not be organized in the same sequence as it comes in the prospectus.
In addition to the textbook, include a minimum of two (2) scholarly references and cite them within the text of your discussion.
Respond to at least one peer enhancing the collaborative learning environment.
Activity 3 - CLO 3, CLO 4, CLO 10
Complete the following sections of your Potential Prospectus:
1. Problem Statement (unresolved problems of theoretical and/or practical significance in the domain covered in the background of the study section).
· State the general problem you identified through reading the literature.
· Based on some of the literature reviewed for the background of the study, and given what other researchers are exploring, what meaningful gap have you identified that your study will address.
· State the specific problem you are going to study for addressing the identified gap.
2. Purpose of the Study (declaration of the intent of the study, which should be aligned with the problem statement).
· Develop the purpose of your proposed study and start by using terms such as “The purpose of this”:
· Qualitative study is to explore, understand, describe,…….
· Quantitative study is to examine, analyze, predict,……
· For mixed methods studies, both terminologies are used
Please provide, in addition to the textbook, a minimum of two (2) scholarly references and cite them within the text of your activity.
Please see Grading Rubrics for Discussions, Activities, Final Prospectus and Prospectus presentation on pages 6-9 of the syllabus.
4. Week 4: Theoretical and/Conceptual Framework and Research Questions
Assignments to complete this week:
· Reading: American Psychological Association (7th ed.)
· Chapter 6: Mechanics of Style
· Reading: Creswell & Creswell (5th ed.)
· Chapter 3: The Use of Theory
· Chapter 7: Research Questions and Hypotheses
· Post DQ Answers by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m.
· Post DQ Peer Responses by Saturday at 11:59 p.m.
· Activity 4 is due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m.
Each week, students must post one (1) initial posting and one (1) peer response for every discussion question. Please see Grading Criteria for Discussion Board Participation on pages 8-9 of the syllabus for Discussion Questions and Response expectations.
Each week you will write and submit a section of your prospectus, which should include peer-reviewed references cited within the text in response to the assigned activities and discussion questions. The instructor will provide feedback, suggestions, and sometimes questions to focus your thinking or critique to improve your writing.
Discussion Question 4 - CLO 5, CLO 6, CLO 10
Use the article you chose in the Week 2 Discussion and information from Chapters 3 and 7 of the Creswell textbook and discuss the following:
· The theoretical or conceptual framework of the study and alignment with the problem statement
· The study’s research questions and hypotheses if the study is quantitative
· Alignment of the research questions with the study’s purpose
In addition to the textbook, include a minimum of two (2) scholarly references and cite them within the text of your discussion.
Respond to at least one peer enhancing the collaborative learning environment.
Activity 4 - CLO 5, CLO 6, CLO 10
Complete the Following Sections of your Potential Prospectus:
Theoretical or Conceptual Framework:
· Discuss the theories or concepts that support your study; and justify the relevance to your research problem, purpose, and the nature of your study.
Research Questions:
· After reviewing Chapter 7 of the Creswell textbook, create at least three (3) research questions, precise and aligned with the purpose of the study, that will be the guide to what needs to be done to conduct the research.
· State the research questions (and the hypotheses for quantitative studies) in the manner that implicitly identifies the underlying applicable methodology.
Please provide, in addition to the textbook, a minimum of two (2) scholarly references and cite them within the text of your activity.
Please see Grading Rubrics for Discussions, Activities, Final Prospectus and Prospectus presentation on pages 6-9 of the syllabus.
5. Week 5: Nature of the Study
Assignments to complete this week:
· Reading: American Psychological Association (7th ed.)
· Chapter 8: Works Credited in the Text
· Reading: Creswell & Creswell (5th ed.)
· Chapter 8: Quantitative Methods
· Chapter 9: Qualitative Methods
· Chapter 10: Mixed Methods Procedures
· Post DQ Answers by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m.
· Post DQ Peer Responses by Saturday at 11:59 p.m.
· Activity 5 is due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m.
Each week, students must post one (1) initial posting and one (1) peer response for every discussion question. Please see Grading Criteria for Discussion Board Participation on pages 8-9 of the syllabus for Discussion Questions and Response expectations.
Each week you will write and submit a section of your prospectus, which should include peer-reviewed references cited within the text in response to the assigned activities and discussion questions. The instructor will provide feedback, suggestions, and sometimes questions to focus your thinking or critique to improve your writing.
Discussion Question 5 - CLO 7, CLO 10
Use the article you chose in the week 2 Discussion and information from Chapters 8, 9, and 10 of the Creswell textbook to discuss the research method chosen by the author(s) and analyze its alignment with the research questions.
In addition to the textbook, include a minimum of two (2) scholarly references and cite them within the text of your discussion. Respond to at least one peer enhancing the collaborative learning environment.
Activity 5 - CLO 7, CLO 10
Complete the following Section of your Potential Prospectus.
Develop the Nature of your Study:
The nature of the study should include the following:
· Research method: quantitative, qualitative, or the mixed methods
· Research design in alignment with your research method
· Data needed, how you will access the data, and provide indications that the needed data can be accessed.
· Description of data collection method: direct observation, interviews, survey instrument, experimental design, archival, proprietary information, publicly available data, etc.
· Description of any data collection instrument(s) that is planned to be used and any pilot study needed (e.g., if you design your own survey).
· Description of planned data analysis, including statistical tests
Remember, the prospectus and proposal will be written in the future tense.
Please provide, in addition to the textbook, a minimum of two (2) scholarly references and cite them within the text of your activity.
Please see Grading Rubrics for Discussions, Activities, Final Prospectus, and Prospectus presentation on pages 6-9 of the syllabus.
6. Week 6: Significance
Assignments to complete this week:
· Reading: American Psychological Association (7th ed.)
· Chapter 7: Tables and Figures
· Reading: Creswell & Creswell (5th ed.)
· Chapter 8: Quantitative Methods
· Chapter 9: Qualitative Methods
· Chapter 10: Mixed Methods Procedures
· Post DQ Answers by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m.
· Post DQ Peer Responses by Saturday at 11:59 p.m.
· Activity 6 is due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m.
Each week, students must post one (1) initial posting and one (1) peer response for every discussion question. Please see Grading Criteria for Discussion Board Participation on pages 8-9 of the syllabus for Discussion Questions and Response expectations.
Each week you will write and submit a section of your prospectus, which should include peer-reviewed references cited within the text in response to the assigned activities and discussion questions. The instructor will provide feedback, suggestions, and sometimes questions to focus your thinking or critique to improve your writing.
Discussion Question 6 - CLO 8, CLO 9, CLO 10
Use the article you chose in the Week 2 Discussion to discuss the study’s significance to the research field and related professional practice:
· The main contribution of the author to the field of study and generalizability of the research findings
· The value of the study for the related professional practice and the social impact of the research
In addition to the textbook, include a minimum of two (2) scholarly references and cite them within the text of your discussion.
Respond to at least one peer enhancing the collaborative learning environment.
Activity 6 - CLO 8, CLO 9, CLO 10
Complete the following section of your prospectus:
Significance of the study:
· Justify the expected significance of the proposed study by delineating its potential contribution to the field relevant to your research, professional practice, and the social impact of your research.
Note: you should use non-confirmatory language, such as:
“The potential findings of my study might lead to a better understanding of outsourcing.”
“The evaluation of employee attitudes could help improve company production.”
Please provide, in addition to the textbook, a minimum of two (2) scholarly references and cite them within the text of your activity.
Please see Grading Rubrics for Discussions, Activities, Final Prospectus and Prospectus presentation on pages 6-9 of the syllabus.
7. Week 7: Draft of Prospectus
Assignments to complete this week:
· Reading: American Psychological Association (7th ed.)
· Chapter 9: Reference List
· Reading: Creswell & Creswell (5th ed.)
· Chapter 8: Quantitative Methods
· Chapter 9: Qualitative Methods
· Chapter 10: Mixed MethodsProcedures
· Post DQ Answers by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m.
· Post DQ Peer Responses by Saturday at 11:59 p.m.
· Activity 7 is due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m.
Each week, students must post one (1) initial posting and one (1) peer response for every discussion question. Please see Grading Criteria for Discussion Board Participation on pages 8-9 of the syllabus for Discussion Questions and Response expectations.
Each week you will write and submit a section of your prospectus, which should include peer-reviewed references cited within the text in response to the assigned activities and discussion questions. The instructor will provide feedback, suggestions, and sometimes questions to focus your thinking or critique to improve your writing.
Draft of the Prospectus 7:
Complete the Draft of the Prospectus - CLO1, CLO 2, CLO 3, CLO 4, CLO 5, CLO 6, CLO 7, CLO 8, CLO 9, CLO 10
· Revise all sections of the prospectus that you developed during previous weeks and submit the entire draft, using the prospectus template, including appendices (if relevant).
· Include the title page and a complete and properly formatted reference list for all in-text citations.
· The draft of the prospectus should include at least 15 pages, excluding title page, table of contents, references, and appendices.
Please note the draft of your prospectus will be distributed to SMEs, methodologists, and chairs for their indication of interest to serve in your potential future dissertation committee.
Please note, in addition to your textbook, your prospectus should contain at least ten scholarly references in a cumulative list that incorporates all sources cited during the past weeks of the class. All references should be cited within the prospectus text.
Please see Grading Rubrics for Discussions, Activities, Final Prospectus and Prospectus presentation on pages 6-9 of the syllabus.
8. Week 8: Final Prospectus and Prospectus Presentation
Assignments to complete this week:
· Reading: American Psychological Association (7th ed.)
· Chapter 12: Publication Process
· Post DQ Answers by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m.
· Post DQ Peer Responses by Saturday at 11:59 p.m.
· Prospectus Presentation due in class
· Final Project due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m.
Each week, students must post one (1) initial posting and one (1) peer response for every discussion question. Please see Grading Criteria for Discussion Board Participation on pages 8-9 of the syllabus for Discussion Questions and Response expectations.
The Final Prospectus - CLO1, CLO 2, CLO 3, CLO 4, CLO 5, CLO 6, CLO 7, CLO 8, CLO 9, CLO 10
Review the feedback on your Week 7 prospectus draft (including feedback from potential committee members) provided by your instructor and resubmit the revised prospectus, which should include at least 15 pages, excluding title page, table of contents, references, and appendices.
Please note, in addition to your textbook, your prospectus should contain at least ten scholarly references in a cumulative list that incorporates all sources cited during the past weeks of the class. All references should be cited within the prospectus text.
The Prospectus - Presentation
Create at least 10 slides of PowerPoint presentation which summarizes your potential prospectus that will be presented in the class to your peers and potential dissertation committee members. The presentation should include a summary of each section of your prospectus. The presentation will be followed by questions and answers.
Please note, in addition to your textbook, your prospectus should contain at least ten scholarly references in a cumulative list that incorporates all sources cited during the past weeks of the class.
Please see Grading Rubrics for Discussions, Activities, Final Prospectus and Prospectus presentation on pages 6-9 of the syllabus.
Appendix 1: Create a Bibliography, Citations, and References in Microsoft Word
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/create-a-bibliography-citations-and-references-17686589-4824-4940-9c69-342c289fa2a5
Word for Microsoft 365 Word 2019 Word 2016 Word 2013 Word 2010 Word 2007
1. Put your cursor at the end of the text you want to cite.
2. Go to References > Style, and choose a citation style.
3. Select Insert Citation.
4. Choose Add New Source and fill out the information about your source.
Once you've added a source to your list, you can cite it again:
5. Put your cursor at the end of the text you want to cite.
6. Go to References > Insert Citation, and choose the source you are citing.
1. To add details, like page numbers if you're citing a book, select Citation Options, and then Edit Citation.
Create a bibliography
With cited sources in your document, you're ready to create a bibliography.
1. Put your cursor where you want the bibliography.
2. Go to References > Bibliography, and choose a format.
Tip: If you cite a new source, add it to the bibliography by clicking anywhere in the bibliography and selecting Update Citations and Bibliography.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/add-citations-in-a-word-document-ab9322bb-a8d3-47f4-80c8-63c06779f127
Add citations in a Word document
Word for Microsoft 365 Word 2019 Word 2016
In Word, you can easily add citations when writing a document where you need to cite your sources, such as a research paper. Citations can be added in various formats, including APA, Chicago-style, GOST, IEEE, ISO 690, and MLA; however, at Westcliff University, we only use APA style. Afterwards, you can create a bibliography of the sources you used to write your paper.
To add a citation to your document, you first add the source that you used.
Add a new citation and source to a document
1. On the References tab, in the Citations & Bibliography group, click the arrow next to Style and click the style that you want to use for the citation and source. For example, social sciences documents usually use the MLA or APA styles for citations and sources.
2. Click at the end of the sentence or phrase that you want to cite.
3. On the Reference tab, click Insert Citation and then do one of the following:
· To add the source information, click Add New Source, and then, in the Create Source dialog box, click the arrow next to Type of Source, and select the type of source you want to use (for example, a book section or a website).
· To add a placeholder, so that you can create a citation and fill in the source information later, click Add New Placeholder. A question mark appears next to placeholder sources in Source Manager.
4. If you choose to add a source, enter the details for the source. To add more information about a source, click the Show All Bibliography Fields check box.
5. Click OK when finished. The source is added as a citation at the place you selected in your document.
When you've completed these steps, the citation is added to the list of available citations. The next time you quote this reference, you don't have to type it all out again. You just add the citation to your document. After you've added a source, you may find you need to make changes to it at a later time. To do this, see Edit a source.
Notes:
· If you've added a placeholder and want to replace it with citation information, see Edit a source.
· If you choose a GOST or ISO 690 style for your sources and a citation is not unique, append an alphabetic character to the year. For example, a citation would appear as [Pasteur, 1848a].
· If you choose ISO 690-Numerical Reference and your citations still don't appear consecutively, you must click the ISO 690 style again, and then press ENTER to correctly order the citations.
Add citations to your document
1. Click at the end of the sentence or phrase that you want to cite, and then on the References tab, in the Citations & Bibliography group, click Insert Citations.
2. From the list of citations under Insert Citation, select the citation you want to use.
The list of sources that you use can become quite long. At times, you might need to search for a source that you cited in another document.
1. On the References tab, in the Citations & Bibliography group, click Manage Sources.
If you open a new document that does not yet contain citations, all of the sources that you used in previous documents appear under Master List.
If you open a document that includes citations, the sources for those citations appear under Current List. All the sources that you have cited, either in previous documents or in the current document, appear under Master List.
2. To find a specific source, do one of the following:
· In the sorting box, sort by author, title, citation tag name, or year, and then look for the source that you want in the resulting list.
· In the Search box, type the title or author for the source that you want to find. The list dynamically narrows to match your search term.
Note: You can click the Browse button in Source Manager to select another master list from which you can import new sources into your document. For example, you might connect to a file on a shared server, on a research colleague's computer or server, or on a Web site that is hosted by a university or research institution.
1. On the References tab, in the Citations & Bibliography group, click Manage Sources.
2. In the Source Manager dialog box, under Master List or Current List, select the source you want to edit, and then click Edit.
Note: To edit a placeholder to add citation information, select the placeholder from Current List and click Edit.
3. In the Edit Source dialog box, make the changes you want and click OK.
Appendix 2: Week 2 Peer-Reviewed Articles
Bedau, M., A., Gigliotti, N., Janssen, T., Kosik, A., Nambiar, A., & Packard, N. (2019). Open-ended technological innovation. Artificial Life 25, 33–49. http:doi.org/10.1162/artl_a_00279
Benitez, j., Ray, G., & Henseler, J. (2018). Impact of IT infrastructure flexibility on mergers and acquisitions. MS Quarterly, 42(1), 25-43. http:doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/13245
Cerulli, R., Dameri, R., P., & Sciomachen, P. (2018). Operations management in distribution networks within a smart city frame. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 29, 189-205. http:doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpw024
Eyink, J., R., Motz, B., A., Heltzel, G., & Liddell, T., M. (2020). Self‐regulated studying behavior, and the social norms that influence it. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 50, 10-21. http:doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12637
Fernandez, F., M., Bornay-Barrachina, M., & Lopez-Cabrales, A. (2017). HRM practices and
innovation performance: A panel-data approach. International Journal of Manpower, 38 (3), 354-372. http:doi.org/10.1108/IJM-02-2015-0028
Jaisinghani, D., & Kanjilal, K. (2019). Marketing investments and firm performance in
manufacturing sector: A panel threshold model for China. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 24(1), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2018.1554617
Lee, N. (2017). Psychology and the geography of innovation. Economic Geography, 93(2), 106-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1249845
Men, L., R., Chen, Z., F., & Ji, Y. G. (2018). Walking the talk: An exploratory examination of executive leadership communication at startups in China. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(1,2), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1455147
Naseem, M., A., Zhang, H., Malik, F., & Rehman, R. (2017). Capital structure and corporate governance. The Journal of Developing Areas, 51(1), 33-47. http:dx.doi.org/10.1353/jda.2017.0002
Schmid, J., Kolesnikov, S., A., & Youtie, J. (2017). Plans versus experiences in transitioning
transnational education into research and economic development: A case study. Science and Public Policy, 45(1), 103–116. http:doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx051