Qualitative Research Methods
CONSTRUCTING 10 STRATEGIC POINTS 2
Constructing 10 Strategic Points
RES-855-0502- Qualitative Research Methods
April 3, 2019
|
|
10 Strategic Points |
Comments or Feedback |
|
Broad Topic Area |
Uncivility in the psychology of the undergraduate education program |
|
|
Lit Review |
Gaps Alt, & Itzkovich, (2015, pp. 121-134) asserts that phenomenon of civility in education program students has been neglected for many years. However, focus has now turned towards academic setting which tries to bring a connection between the field’s general civilization and the student. De Luca, Blosnich, Hentschel, King, & Amen (2016, pp. 174-179) agrees that there has been a neglect in the area of a mental health problem for an extended period of time. This is changing as focus is now turned to it with realization that most African-Americans, Black-Hispanic face racial as well. Theoretical Foundation The gap exists between women and colored people incivility in all incivility by undergraduate students does exist and sectors. Therefore, Miner, Diaz & Rinn, (2017), Alt, & Itzkovich, (2015, pp. 121-134) and De Luca, Blosnich, Hentschel, King, & Amen (2016, pp. 174-179) have agreed to the fact that it is a problem.
|
|
|
Problem Statement |
Incivility is a major factor in the undergraduate's education package which cost both the education and health sectors in the country. |
|
|
Research Questions |
RQ 1- How does incivility affect STEM intake in undergraduate education? RQ 2- How does incivility affect the health of minority races/groups in the country? |
|
|
Sample |
A total sampling method will be used. Etikan, Musa, & Alkassim, (2016, pp. 1-4) asserts that total sampling is best as qualitative research requires non-generalized answers and in-depth interviews to get the true results. |
|
|
Describe Phenomena (Qualitative) |
There exist high levels of incivility in all sectors of the country. |
|
|
Methodology and Design |
Qualitative descriptive research for clear and conclusive results (Etikan, Musa, & Alkassim, 2016, pp1-4). |
|
|
Purpose Statement |
The main purpose of this study was to reflect the possible issues that result to incivility so as to recommend possible remedies, (Clark, 2018). |
|
|
Data Collection Instruments and Approach |
· Interviews with students and physicians as well as therapists. Questionnaires will also be used. |
|
|
Data Analysis Approach |
· Data will be collected and analyzed for the study. · Descriptive statistics will be used in summarizing acquired data. · coding of questionnaires will be done. Conversation analysis will also be used (Smith, 2015) |
|
References
Smith, J. A. (Ed.). (2015). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. Sage.
Alt, D., & Itzkovich, Y. (2015). Assessing the connection between students’ justice experience and perceptions of faculty incivility in higher education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(2), 121-134.
Miner, K. N., Diaz, I., & Rinn, A. N. (2017). Incivility, Psychological Distress, and Math Self-Concept among Women and Students of Color in STEM. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 23(3).
Taylor, E. A., Hardin, R., Welch, N., & Smith, A. B. (2018). Incivility in the Workplace: The Experiences of Female Sport Management Faculty in Higher Education. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS, 33(2), 180-198.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.