The Literature Landscape: Organizational Leadership Reading Research
ldsree
RES-820Rubric-ReadingResearch.pdf
1/2/24, 8:02 PM
Page 1 of 6about:srcdoc
Reading Research - Rubric
Part 1: Relevance of Artifacts 28.5 points
Collapse All
1/2/24, 8:02 PM
Page 2 of 6about:srcdoc
Criteria Description
Part 1: Relevance of Artifacts
5. 5: Excellent 28.5 points
The artifact most relevant to the learner's program and emphasis was
correctly identified. All key questions are thoroughly addressed. There is
overwhelming evidence of critical thought and scholarly reflection in the
treatment of the key questions.
4. 4: Good 25.94 points
The artifact most relevant to the learner's program and emphasis was
correctly identified. All key questions are reasonably addressed. There is
appropriate evidence of critical thought and scholarly reflection in the
treatment of the key questions.
3. 3: Satisfactory 23.37 points
The artifact most relevant to the learner's program and emphasis was
correctly identified. All key questions are addressed. There is minimal
evidence of critical thought and scholarly reflection in the treatment of
the key questions.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 20.81 points
An artifact relevant to the learner's program and emphasis was
identified. Key questions from the template are not addressed or are
incorrectly addressed. Evidence of critical thought and scholarly
reflection is lacking.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
No artifact was identified, or the artifact that was identified did not align
to the learner's program and emphasis.
1/2/24, 8:02 PM
Page 3 of 6about:srcdoc
Part 2: Reading Strategy 57 points
Criteria Description
Part 2: Reading Strategy
5. 5: Excellent 57 points
Notes and evidence of engaging with the outlined reading strategy are
complete. All key questions are thoroughly addressed. There is
overwhelming evidence of critical thought and scholarly reflection in the
treatment of the key questions.
4. 4: Good 51.87 points
Notes and evidence of engaging with the outlined reading strategy are
present. All key questions are reasonably addressed. There is
appropriate evidence of critical thought and scholarly reflection in the
treatment of the key questions.
3. 3: Satisfactory 46.74 points
Notes and evidence of engaging with the outlined reading strategy are
present. All key questions are addressed if only in a cursory manner.
There is minimal evidence of critical thought and scholarly reflection in
the treatment of the key questions.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 41.61 points
Notes and evidence of engaging with the outlined reading strategy are
present but incomplete or illogical. Key questions from the template are
not addressed. Evidence of critical thought and scholarly reflection is
lacking.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Notes and evidence of engaging with the outlined reading strategy are
either missing or not evident to the reader.
1/2/24, 8:02 PM
Page 4 of 6about:srcdoc
Part 3: Gathering Additional Resources 38 points
Criteria Description
Part 3: Gathering Additional Resources
5. 5: Excellent 38 points
Evidence of engaging with the outlined process of gathering additional
resources is clear. All key questions are fully addressed and display
strong evidence of understanding the purpose of the technique.
4. 4: Good 34.58 points
Evidence of engaging with the outlined process of gathering additional
resources is present. All key questions are reasonably addressed and
display evidence of emerging understanding of the purpose of the
technique.
3. 3: Satisfactory 31.16 points
Evidence of engaging with the outlined process of gathering additional
resources is present. All key questions are addressed if only in a cursory
manner.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 27.74 points
Evidence of engaging with the outlined process of gathering additional
resources is present but incomplete or inaccurate. Key questions from
the template are not addressed.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Evidence of engaging with the outlined process of gathering additional
resources is either missing or not evident to the reader.
1/2/24, 8:02 PM
Page 5 of 6about:srcdoc
Part 4: Reflection 47.5 points
Criteria Description
Part 4: Reflection
5. 5: Excellent 47.5 points
A reflection is clear, thorough, and scholarly. Clear evidence of critical
thought is present. The reflection connects directly to the articles read
and the reading strategy employed.
4. 4: Good 43.23 points
A reflection is present. Clear evidence of critical thought and scholarly
reflection is present. The reflection connects to the articles read and the
reading strategy employed.
3. 3: Satisfactory 38.95 points
A reflection is cursory. Some evidence of critical thought and scholarly
reflection is present. All key questions are addressed if only in a cursory
manner. There is a vague connection to the articles read and the reading
strategy employed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 34.68 points
A reflection is present but illogical or unreasoned. Critical thought and
scholarly reflection are not evident. Key questions from the template are
not addressed. Connection to the articles read and the reading strategy
is not evident.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
A reflection is either missing or not evident.
1/2/24, 8:02 PM
Page 6 of 6about:srcdoc
Mechanics of Writing 19 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing
5. 5: Excellent 19 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good 17.29 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be
present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech
are used.
3. 3: Satisfactory 15.58 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly
distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-
appropriate language are used.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory 13.87 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or
word choice are present.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory 0 points
Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence
construction are used.
Total 190 points
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
