Write 1000-words dialectical essay for the topic of your choice for Critical Thinking (Logic) Class
For this essay, you will defend a definite position on a topic or an issue of your choice. (In keeping with standard practice at the college level, I will not suggest or approve of topics for any student. Choosing your topic is a part of your assignment.) The first step is to identify the position that you wish to defend, and then express that position clearly and concisely in a single proposition. This proposition becomes the thesis of your essay. Then, you will write a dialectical essay that defends your thesis. See the detailed prompt, below.
write a dialectical essay that meets the following requirements:
· The essay is a dialectical essay (to refresh your memory, see The Dialectical Essay)
· Requirements regarding paragraph #1:
· The thesis must appear as the very last sentence of the paragraph. (Note: A thesis itself should not be a compound sentence. If your thesis is embedded within a compound sentence, ensure that the thesis is the very last of the component sentences.)
· The paragraph contains no argumentation at all
· Requirements regarding paragraph #2
· Your argument in favor of your thesis makes its very first appearance here
· Your argument is logically problem-free
· Your argument has a conclusion indicator
· The conclusion of your argument mirrors the very last sentence of the first paragraph.
· Requirements regarding paragraph #3
· Consists solely in a direct reply to the core content of paragraph #2
· Represents the views of someone other than the author of the essay
· Begins with transitional language to make clear that the author is now playing the Devil's Advocate
· Features an anticipated objection to the argument in paragraph #2
· Helpful hint: See if one of the informal fallacies is something that an opponent might use. If so, use it!
· Also, this could consist in questioning the truth of one or more of the premises, or in questioning the argument form
· Ideally, avoids objecting to the thesis itself (It should be objecting only to the argument in paragraph #2)
· Ideally, avoids offering a separate argument completely unrelated to the argument in paragraph #2 (It should be objecting only to the argument in paragraph #2)
· Requirements regarding paragraph #4
· Consists solely in a direct reply to the core content of paragraph #3
· Represents the views of the author of the essay
· Begins with transitional language to make clear that the author has now returned to advocating for their own position(s)
· Explains why the anticipated objection in paragraph #3 is mistaken
· Hint: If you used an informal fallacy as the anticipated objection in paragraph #3, you can basically just name and explain the fallacy.
· Requirements regarding paragraph #5
· Summarizes the chain of reasoning through paragraphs 2-4
For this essay, you will defend a definite position on a topic or an issue of your choice. (In
keeping with standard practice at the college level,
I will not suggest or approve of topics for any
studen
t
. Choosing your topic is
a part of your assignmen
t
.)
The first step is to identify the
position that you wish to defend, and then express that position clearly and concisely in a single
proposition. This proposition becomes the thesis of your essay. Then, you will write a
dialectical
essa
y
that defends your
thesis. See the detailed prompt, below
.
write a dialectical essay that meets the following requirements:
·
The essay is a dialectical essay (to refresh your memory, see The Dialectical Essay)
·
Requirements regarding parag
raph #1:
o
The thesis must appear as the very last sentence of the paragraph. (Note: A
thesis itself should not be a compound sentence. If your thesis is embedded
within a compound sentence, ensure that the thesis is the very last of the
component sentences.
)
o
The paragraph
contains no argumentation
at all
·
Requirements regarding paragraph #2
o
Your argument in favor of your thesis makes its
very first appearance
here
o
Your argument is logically problem
-
free
o
Your argument has a conclusion indicator
o
The conclusion
of your argument mirrors the very last sentence of the first
paragraph.
·
Requirements regarding paragraph #3
o
Consists solely in a direct reply to the core content of paragraph #2
o
Represents the views of someone other than the author of the essay
o
Begins with
transitional language
to make clear that the author is now playing the
Devil's Adv
ocate
o
Features an anticipated objection to the
argument
in paragraph #2
§
Helpful hint: See if one of the informal fallacies is something that an opponent
might use. If so, us
e it!
§
Also, this could consist in questioning the truth of one or more of the
premises, or in questioning the argument form
o
Ideally,
avoids
objecting to the
thesis
itself (It should be objecting only to
the
argument
in paragraph #2)
o
Ideally,
avoids
offering a separate argu
ment completely unrelated to the
argument in paragraph #2 (It should be objecting only to the
argument
in
paragraph #2)
·
Requirements regarding paragraph #4
o
Consists solely in a
direct reply
to the core
content
of
paragraph #3
o
Repres
ents the views of the
author
of the essay
o
Begins with
transitional language
to make clear that the author has now returned
to advocating for their own position(s)
o
Explains why the anticipated objection in paragraph #3 is mistaken
o
Hint: If you used an informal fallacy as the anticipated objection in paragraph #3,
you can basically just name and explain the fallacy.
For this essay, you will defend a definite position on a topic or an issue of your choice. (In
keeping with standard practice at the college level, I will not suggest or approve of topics for any
student. Choosing your topic is a part of your assignment.) The first step is to identify the
position that you wish to defend, and then express that position clearly and concisely in a single
proposition. This proposition becomes the thesis of your essay. Then, you will write a dialectical
essay that defends your thesis. See the detailed prompt, below.
write a dialectical essay that meets the following requirements:
The essay is a dialectical essay (to refresh your memory, see The Dialectical Essay)
Requirements regarding paragraph #1:
o The thesis must appear as the very last sentence of the paragraph. (Note: A
thesis itself should not be a compound sentence. If your thesis is embedded
within a compound sentence, ensure that the thesis is the very last of the
component sentences.)
o The paragraph contains no argumentation at all
Requirements regarding paragraph #2
o Your argument in favor of your thesis makes its very first appearance here
o Your argument is logically problem-free
o Your argument has a conclusion indicator
o The conclusion of your argument mirrors the very last sentence of the first
paragraph.
Requirements regarding paragraph #3
o Consists solely in a direct reply to the core content of paragraph #2
o Represents the views of someone other than the author of the essay
o Begins with transitional language to make clear that the author is now playing the
Devil's Advocate
o Features an anticipated objection to the argument in paragraph #2
Helpful hint: See if one of the informal fallacies is something that an opponent
might use. If so, use it!
Also, this could consist in questioning the truth of one or more of the
premises, or in questioning the argument form
o Ideally, avoids objecting to the thesis itself (It should be objecting only to
the argument in paragraph #2)
o Ideally, avoids offering a separate argument completely unrelated to the
argument in paragraph #2 (It should be objecting only to the argument in
paragraph #2)
Requirements regarding paragraph #4
o Consists solely in a direct reply to the core content of paragraph #3
o Represents the views of the author of the essay
o Begins with transitional language to make clear that the author has now returned
to advocating for their own position(s)
o Explains why the anticipated objection in paragraph #3 is mistaken
o Hint: If you used an informal fallacy as the anticipated objection in paragraph #3,
you can basically just name and explain the fallacy.