Controversies in Industrial and Organizational Assessment

Baez, H. B. (2013). Personality tests in employment selection: Use with caution. Cornell HR Review. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/chrr/ 

Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2020a). Case Description: Mr. E - Police Candidate Interpretative Report [PDF]. https://www.pearsonassessments.com/content/dam/school/ global/clinical/us/assets/mmpi-3/mmpi-3-police-candidate-interpretive-report-male.pdf

Corey, D. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2020b). Case Description: Ms. F - Police Candidate Interpretative Report [PDF]. https://www.pearsonassessments.com/content/dam/school/ global/clinical/us/assets/mmpi-3/mmpi-3-police-candidate-interpretive-report-female.pdf

Gregory, R. J. (2014). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Chapter 11: Industrial, Occupational, and Career Assessment

Hogan, J., Barrett, P., & Hogan, R. (2007). Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5).

Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Are We Getting Fooled Again? Coming to Terms with Limitations in the Use of Personality Tests for Personnel Selection. Personnel Psychology, 60(4). https://doi-org.proxy-library.ashford.edu/10.1111/ j.1744-6570.2007.00100.x

Peterson, M., Griffith, R., Isaacson, J., O’Connell, M., & Mangos, P. (2011). Applicant Faking, Social Desirability, and the Prediction of Counterproductive Work Behaviors. Human Performance, 24(3), 270–290.