you must demonstrate how this is a contemporary international business issue and consider its impact on Australia.
BMGT1IB REPORT RUBRIC – 20% of subject assessment
|
Components |
Highly Competent
4 marks |
Competent
3 marks |
Satisfactory
2 marks |
Unsatisfactory
0 marks
|
|
Purpose and objective
|
Purpose and objective of the report are made clear, and the report addresses the objective(s) in a focused and logical manner.
|
The purpose and the objective of the report is made clear, and the report addresses the objective(s). |
The purpose and the objective of the report is somewhat clear, and the report addresses the objective(s) to some degree. |
The report does not clearly address the objectives |
|
Formal structure & Presentation
|
All required elements of the report (as identified in the checklist provided to students) are present and completed to a high standard. The document is professional looking, using informative headings and figures/tables where appropriate.
|
Most required elements of the report (as identified in the checklist provided to students) are present and completed to a high standard. The document is uses informative headings and figures/tables where appropriate. |
Most required elements of the report (as identified in the checklist provided to students) are present and completed to a satisfactory standard. Attention to the presentation is given, but may not be well executed. |
Key elements of the business report are not provided and/or presented with errors evident. Overall presentation of the document is not to a professional standard. |
|
Clarity & Conciseness
|
Key points and or argument effectively and efficiently conveyed; highly focused on the question; easily understood.
|
Key points and or argument satisfactorily conveyed; very well focused on the question; easily understood. |
Argument reasonably clear; occasionally misses the point but answers the question; not overelaborate or over complicated. |
Key points and or arguments are unclear/confused. Irrelevant information, no transition between ideas.
|
|
Research |
Information is derived from a wide range of academic sources. Excellent demonstration of critical thought and analysis.
|
Information is derived from several academic sources. Very high demonstration of critical thought and analysis.
|
Further research is required. Some sources are not suitable for academic writing. Satisfactory level of critical though and analysis, but requires improvement. |
Very little research conducted and or inappropriate sources used. No evidence of critical though and analysis. |
|
Referencing
|
Faultless application of the Harvard style of referencing. |
Very good application of the Harvard style of referencing. Only one or two minor errors.
|
Satisfactory application of the Harvard style of referencing. Several minor errors.
|
No evidence of the Harvard style of referencing. Many errors.
|
|
Writing mechanics
|
Writing is clear and concise. Excellent sentence structures and grammar. Correct use of punctuation. No spelling errors. |
Writing is mainly clear and concise. Very good sentence structures and grammar. Mostly correct use of punctuation. Very few spelling errors. |
Writing lacks clarity and or conciseness. Satisfactory sentence structures and grammar. Several punctuation and spelling errors.
|
Writing lacks clarity and or conciseness. Unsatisfactory sentence structures and grammar. Numerous punctuation and spelling errors.
|
|
Presentation
|
Fulfills all required presentation guidelines.
|
Complies with most required presentation guidelines.
|
Several deviations from required presentation guidelines.
|
Has not following required presentation guidelines. |
|
Organization |
The paper is clearly organization, resulting in clarity and logically arranged points. |
Organization is mainly clear and logical, but can be difficult to follow at times. |
Mainly Satisfactory arrangement of ideas. Several digressions, making it difficult to follow the paper.
|
No clarity and logical organization of ideas. Paper does not make sense. |
|
|
Score: /32
|