Essay 1000 words by 11/27/2020 at 6:00 pm please follow the rubric and template that I uploaded,please add references and citations
Idelcuba83
ReportPDF10.pdf
Submission Ide: 9b1026a9-9c5e-448a-a302-fb131b6cd877
29% SIMILARITY SCORE 6 CITATION ITEMS 23 GRAMMAR ISSUES 0 FEEDBACK COMMENT Internet Source 0% Institution 29%
Ivis Perez Delgado
Research Critique Guideline Part 2 edited 11-27-2020.docx
Summary
1258 Words
Running head: RESEARCH CRITIQUE GUIDELINE PART 2 1
RESEARCH CRITIQUE GUIDELINE PART 2 2
Research Critique Guideline Part 2
Quantitative Articles
Article 1: Jansen, K. U., & Anderson, A. S. (2018). The role of vaccines in fighting
Student: Submitted to Grand Canyon University
Spelling mistake: &Immunotherapeutics
Research Critique Guideline Part 2
Ivis Perez Delgado
Grand Canyon University
11/27/2020
antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Human Vaccines &Immunotherapeutics, 14(9), 2142–2149.
Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6183139/
Article 2: Lee, C.-R., Cho, I. H., Jeong, B. C., & Lee, S. H. (2013). Strategies to minimize
antibiotic resistance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(9),
4274–4305. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3799537/
The article on “The role of vaccines in fighting antimicrobial resistance (AMR)” by
Jansen & Anderson (2018) majorly focuses on conducting an examination of the role of vaccines
when it comes to fighting Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) issue. The authors of the article tend
to utilize a descriptive tool to review the historical utilization of different approaches which has
been employed in the management of AMR. The research study tends to conclude that different
forms of vaccines such as viral vaccines may not be utilized to fight AMR. On the other end, the
article “Strategies to minimize antibiotic resistance” by Lee et al. (2013) tends to focus on
developing a relationship between Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs include
pharmacodynamics as well as pharmacokinetic as well as AMR. Both of the articles tend to
focus on identifying the various aspects which contribute to causing AMR as well as the various
programs which have been established to limit as well as curb the AMR.
Jansen & Anderson (2018) asserts that AMR tends to be associated with high mortality as
well as morbidity rate. Thus, the authors assert that there is a need for an urgent clinical solution
to this problem. On the other hand, Lee et al. (2013) tend to be more focused on the fact that
AMR tends to decrease the antibiotic effectiveness and as a result, society's wellbeing is affected.
RESEARCH CRITIQUE GUIDELINE PART 2 3
In regards to the research hypothesis, the study conducted by Jansen & Anderson (2018) tends to
answer the research question on how vaccines tend to contribute to curbing the AMR battle. On
the other hand, Lee et al.’s (2013) study tends to answer a research question on how
antimicrobial Stewardships Programs contribute to combating AMR.
The article by Jansen & Anderson (2018) tends to answer the PICOT question by trying
to offer solutions related to chronic issues that are influenced by AMR. Authors of the study tend
to determine that different vaccines such as viral vaccines may be utilized to reduce the AMR
risk factor. The study by Lee et al. (2013) also tends to answer the PICOT question by explaining
how collaborative efforts from nurses, patients, and the public may aid in limiting AMR through
the implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) which are the fundamental
solution for the AMR issue.
Also, the article by Jansen & Anderson (2018) also offers diverse strategies towards the
establishment of AMR solutions in comparison to the proposed Picot Question. The authors of
the article provide a proposal that vaccines are essential aspects for combating the AMR issues,
whereas the PICOT question was major focuses on providing a practical management method
which involves the formulation of approaches which tend to control an overdose or misuse of
antibiotic usage which results to AMR. On the other hand, the article by Lee et al. (2013) tends
to utilize an approach that is slightly similar to the PICOT approach in resolving the AMR issue.
Authors of the article tend to maintain that a collaborative effort within the community may
Spelling mistake: pharmacodynamics
Spelling mistake: pharmacokinetic
Grammatical problem: as well as and
Passive voice: have been established
Student: Submitted to Grand Canyon University
on the other hand (...: On the other hand But
Spelling mistake: wellbeing well being
Nonstandard ph...: In regards to In regard to
on the other hand ...: On the other hand But
Spelling mistake: Stewardships Stewardship
Spelling mistake: ASPs Asps
on the other hand (...: On the other hand But
contribute to significantly aid the community to effectively control the AMR issues through
Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs through educating the society regarding the potential
causes of AMR issues. The approach tends to be quite similar to the PICOT question which
RESEARCH CRITIQUE GUIDELINE PART 2 4
asserts that AMR issues may be controlled fundamentally through the utilization of patient
education regarding the AMR causes.
Method of Study
Both of the articles Jansen & Anderson (2018) and Lee et al. (2013) tend to utilize the
descriptive analysis method in reviewing the respective variables. Additionally, the bot does not
utilize any form of sample population but rather they tend to utilize secondary sources in their
data collection. Moreover, both of the research articles tend to be diverse in their areas of
concentration. The article by Jansen & Anderson (2018) tends to significantly focus on providing
publications that are associated with vaccines as an approach towards AMR management with
support from health institutions like World Health Organization (WHO). On the other end, the
article by Lee et al. (2013) mainly focuses on providing publications associated with the role of
Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in controlling the AMR related issues through the
utilization of health data such as pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetic well as diagnostic testing
information
An advantage of the study approach utilized by Jansen & Anderson (2018) is that it tends
to be dependent on peer-reviewed articles in collecting the necessary data and as a result, the
study is likely to attain accurate information regarding the subject on focus. However, a
significant limitation regarding the authors of the article is that they are more dependent on
WHO articles which are quite limited, and as a result, the research study tends to lack a diverse
perspective regarding the subject under investigation. On the other hand, a significant benefit of
the research approach utilized by Lee et al. (2013) is that it depended on peer-reviewed articles
to achieve its research data hence being in a position to achieve accurate information. However,
a significant setback of the research study is that it tends to lack practical data technique of data
RESEARCH CRITIQUE GUIDELINE PART 2 5
collection and as a result, the authors are not in a position to cross-reference its findings which
are found in secondary data which leads to high opportunities of errors occurring.
The study by Jansen & Anderson (2018) identified that different forms of vaccine such as
viral vaccines may be utilized to prevent the issues of AMR from occurring. On the other hand,
the study by Lee et al. (2013) identified that collaborative efforts within the society may
significantly aid in providing support for the ASPs to control microbial resistances.
Student: Submitted to Grand Canyon University
Student: Submitted to Grand Canyon University
Spelling mistake: pharmacodynamics
Spelling mistake: pharmacokinetic
accurate: accurate right
on the other hand (...: On the other hand But
accurate: accurate right
Student: Submitted to Grand Canyon University
on the other hand (...: On the other hand But
Student: Submitted to Grand Canyon University
Spelling mistake: ASPs Asps
Punctuation error: Hence Hence,
Student: Submitted to Grand Canyon University
Date: 26-Jul-2020
A nursing implication attained from the article by Jansen & Anderson (2018) is that nurses will
be in a position to manage AMR through the utilization of drugs. Hence the nurse practitioners
will have a simplified solution to the problem without needing to get the stakeholders involved.
On the other hand, the clinical implication for the study Lee et al. (2013)is that nursing practice
is required to incorporate other related stakeholders to identify the possible solutions related to a
clinical issue.
Some of the anticipated results of the PICOT Question is that educating the patients
regarding AMR related issues tends to significantly aid in reducing the potential causes of AMR.
Provision of education to patients allows the patient population to attain an adequate
understanding regarding the essentialness of adhering to the prescription provided for antibiotics
and as a result limiting the AMR-related issues.
An anticipation outcome for the article by Jansen & Anderson (2018) is that vaccines are the
fundamental approach for limiting AMR issues compared to patient education. However, the
anticipated outcome for the article by Lee et al. (2013) is that the inclusion of stakeholder in
developing a solution for a clinical issue tends to be a positive impact on the public
RESEARCH CRITIQUE GUIDELINE PART 2 6
References
Jansen, K. U., & Anderson, A. S. (2018). The role of vaccines in fighting antimicrobial
resistance (AMR). Human Vaccines &Immunotherapeutics, 14(9), 2142–2149.
Lee, C.-R., Cho, I. H., Jeong, B. C., & Lee, S. H. (2013). Strategies to minimize antibiotic
resistance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(9),
4274–4305.
on the other hand (...: On the other hand But
Redundant phrase: Some of the Some
Spelling mistake: essentialness essentials
