cultural context

profilejrshayma
ReportPDF.pdf

Submission Id: 84feb19b-79fd-4d79-82ec-c2367ccedcc3

84% SIMILARITY SCORE 2   CITATION ITEMS 15   GRAMMAR ISSUES 0   FEEDBACK COMMENT Int ernet Source   0% Inst it ut ion   84%

Gregory Dayes

CULTURAL CONTEXT AND RELIGIOUS VIEWPOINT.docx

Summary  1203 Words  

Running head: CULTURAL CONTEXT AND RELIGIOUS VIEWPOINT 1

CULTURAL CONTEXT AND RELIGIOUS VIEWPOINT 2

CULTURAL CONTEXT AND RELIGIOUS VIEWPOINT 5

St udent Name: Gregory Dayes

Inst ruct or Name: Maureen Talley

Course: MGT 410

Dat e: 11 Dec 2019

Cult ural Cont ext and Religious Viewpoint

Int roduct ion

This demand for servant leadership can somet imes go beyond just mere rhet oric.

When leaders show commit ment and loyalt y t o t heir subject s, t hen t hey can be

t ermed as servant leaders. Tradit ionally, leaders have been made t o feel like bosses

t hat somet imes care more about t hemselves t han t he people t hat t hey are act ually

supposed t o be leading. As a result , t hey have failed t o address t he main issues t hat

t hey ought t o look at , which in my view a boss should be looking at how t hey can

make t heir people bet t er t hem self and in doing so set t ing t hese people up for

success which will act ually make you has t he boss also successful. Many definit ions

have been put fort h in an at t empt t o define who great leaders are (In Nakanishi,

2015). Great leaders have been known as t hose leaders who possess cert ain qualit ies

t hat make t hem qualify t o be referred t o as servant leaders. Servant leaders usually

spend resources in t he int erest of t he people t hey lead. The not ion of leadership has

been explored from various st andpoint s. However, t his paper will analyze how a

specific religious t radit ion and cult ural orient at ion relat e t o servant leadership.

Servant Leadership from a Cult ural Perspect ive

In an art icle t hat illust rat es leadership about cult ure, a st udy of t he cult ural orient at ion

of t he Indian societ y shows t hat servant leadership can be t raced t o ant iquat ed India.

These are evident in t he manner most of t he Indian leaders lead t heir kin. India, as a

nat ion, has different societ ies, religions, ranks, and dialect s. Some of t he renowned

world leaders like Mahat ma Gandhi are Indians. Such leaders have remarkable qualit ies

t hat are similar t o t hose condit ions cont ained in t he servant leadership philosophies

 Student: Submitted to Grand Canyon University 0…

 Passive voice: have been made

 Passive voice: are actually supposed to b...

 Grammatical problem: agreement error: has

 Student: Submitted to Grand Canyon University 0…

 Passive voice: have been put

 Passive voice: have been known

 Redundant phrase: Some of the  Some

(In Nakanishi, 2015). The classes t hat are associat ed wit h servant leadership include;

Willful Subordinat ion qualit y implies t he abilit y of a leader t o forsake t heir self-int erest

for t he sake of t he general good. Not all leaders are in a posit ion t o make such a

sacrifice (Premchand, 2010). The st udy of t he Indian cult ure exposes some leaders

such as Mahat ma Gandhi, who proved beyond any reasonable doubt t hat t hey are

selfless and are int erest ed in serving t he int erest of t he public.

Being a Servant

It is because of t his qualit y t hat leaders view t hemselves as servant s and not bosses.

This qualit y makes leaders look at t hemselves as people who ought t o serve t he

int erest of t hose t hey lead. According t o Indian cult ure, leaders are seen as servant s

and not mast ers. There is t he same foundat ion t hat enabled Mahat ma Gandhi t o grow

int o a servant leader. Ot her qualit ies of servant leadership include humilit y,

responsibilit y, covenant al relat ionship, fairness, collaborat ion, equalit y, and

accessibilit y (Premchand, 2010).

Servant Leadership from a Religious Perspect ive

The issue of servant leadership about a religious t radit ion can give some insight s on

what is ent ailed in it and also explore t he level of consist ency in values propagat ed by

t he religion and t heir t eachings. Religious beliefs can dict at e what is considered as

servant leadership. All t he fait hful will be expect ed t o adhere t o t he laid down

inst ruct ions concerning values t hat must be upheld by servant leaders (Robert s,

2014). Among all t he religions, t his paper makes a crit ical analysis of Buddhism and it s

pract ices t hat are consist ent wit h servant leadership. Buddhism is a precisely

nont heist ic religion (Robert s, 2014). A closer look at t he values at t ribut ed t o servant

leadership in Buddhism is a clear t est imony t hat religion upholds some level of

responsibilit y. Buddhism is t echnically a nont heist ic religion but is significant values

aimed at guiding it s members.

Most import ant ly is t he fact t hat t hese values relat e more t o an individual's innat e

abilit ies and ext ernal pract ices of a leader. In Buddhism, four st at es of t he mind

cannot be put int o any measurement . They include joy, pat ience, compassion, and

love. Buddhism places a lot of emphasis on servant leadership t hat is charact erized by

virt ues t hat are useful in everyday life. The values t hat are encouraged in servant

leadership in t his religion seem t o be consist ent wit h what is expect ed of servant

leadership.

Comparing t he various religious t radit ions, Buddhism is more compat ible wit h servant

leadership since it emphasizes t he int errelat ionships t hat exist bet ween humanit y and

ot her creat ions. It is similar t o Hinduism because of it s st and on karma and also how

works of t he past have influenced t he present realit ies t hat individuals live in. For

inst ance, much of what humanit y suffers from is a product of past errors (Robert s,

2014). The result s of reckless leadership in t he past can be felt present ly by t hose

present . As a result , t here is a need t o ensure t hat servant leadership is upheld. The

Challenges faced by fut ure generat ions will most ly be dependent on t he kind of

mist akes and errors t hat are commit t ed t oday. Of all t he various t ypes of religion,

Buddhism st ands out for it s st and on servant leadership. Many t heories have been put

fort h in an at t empt t o diffuse more meaning t o t he phrase t o servant leadership.

There is an imminent conflict bet ween t he concept of human right s and Buddhism.

Besides, furt her conflict is also not ed on t he issue of collect ive labor. Buddhism

disagrees wit h t he west ern kind of t hinking and insist s t hat humans cannot have what

is referred t o as inalienable right s. This argument is founded on t he principle, which is

part of t heir t eaching t hat t he self is an illusion. It goes furt her t o argue t hat when

some value is placed on anyt hing, such as self, t hat implies t hat t he int erdependence

of all t hings will be ignored. In an art icle t hat examines t he failure of privacy right s in

Thai cult ure, t he debat e on self is ext ensively discussed. The dist inct ions have been

made clear by Buddhist s, especially concerning an individual's values. For inst ance, in

India, in t he t radit ion of giving, t here is discriminat ion bet ween donors based on ideas

of impunit y and merit (Zent ner, n.d). These creat e a syst em t hat can be considered

unfair because it denies people an opport unit y t o earn somet hing on qualit y.

Similarit ies and Differences bet ween Servant Leadership Philosophies

The similarit ies bet ween servant leadership t heories and some of t he qualit ies

pract iced in Buddhist religion include t he fact t hat Buddhism advocat es for

 Spelling mistake: Premchand  Preached

 Spelling mistake: covenantal  covenant

 Spelling mistake: Premchand  Preached

 Spelling mistake: nontheistic  non theistic

 Spelling mistake: nontheistic  non theistic

 Passive voice: have been put

 Passive voice: have been made

int erdependency where bot h part ies can benefit . These are in line wit h t heir argument

t hat t he self, as proposed by West ern t hinking, is misleading. According t o Buddhist s,

t he concept is unaccept able. Inst ead, t here is a need t o build an all-inclusive societ y

where bot h t he leaders and t heir subject s are equal (Zent ner, n.d). This idea is in line

wit h t he concept s cont ained in t he philosophies of servant leadership. Besides,

Buddhism emphasizes t he need for leaders t o exercise, fairness, responsibilit y,

humilit y, and equalit y. All t hese qualit ies are in t andem wit h t he condit ions t hat are

cont ained in t he servant leadership philosophies. The only difference is t he fact t hat

Buddhism has a prescribed expect at ion of what servant leadership ought t o be.

References

In Nakanishi, D. T. (2015). Asian American leadership: A concise reference guide.

Premchand, A. (2010). Cont emporary India: Societ y and it s governance. New

Brunswick, NJ: Transact ion Publishers.

Robert s, G. E. (2014). Servant leader human resource management : A moral and

spirit ual perspect ive.

Zent ner, A. (n.d.). Servant Leadership and Religious Values: Drawing Speculat ion t o

Commonalit ies bet ween Servant Leadership Charact erist ics and Fait h-Based Values.

SSRN Elect ronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2638587

 Redundant phrase: some of the  some

 Spelling mist...: interdependen...  interdependen...