hw2
ACCT702: Advanced Financial Accounting
Overall Grade:
Day(s) late:
Revised Grade:
Semester Two 2020
|
Stream: |
Student Name: |
Student ID: |
||
|
|
||||
|
|
Indicators of ACHIEVED WITH DISTINCTION |
Indicators of ACHIEVED WITH MERIT |
Indicators of ACHIEVED
|
Indicators of NOT ACHIEVED
|
|
Addressing the task |
Clearly addresses all the requirements and main questions from the assessment brief |
Addresses most of the requirements and main questions from the assessment brief |
Addresses some the requirements and main questions from the assessment brief |
Addresses few of the requirements and main questions from the assessment brief |
|
Evaluation and Discussion |
All the required evaluation was completed correctly. Thorough discussion was provided and supported with appropriate examples and information from research |
Most of the required evaluation was completed correctly. Discussion was mostly thorough and supported with some relevant examples and research information |
Some of the required evaluation was completed correctly. Discussion was mostly descriptive and/or not supported with appropriate examples and research information |
The completed evaluation had many significant errors. Discussion had major flaws and/or was not supported with appropriate examples and any research information |
|
Report Structure |
Develops ideas logically and coherently with smooth flow throughout the report |
Develops ideas coherently but there may be some inconsistencies in the flow through parts of the report
|
Reasonable attempt made to develop ideas logically but may be lacking in coherence in places
|
Report is not well structured. Lacks coherence and logical development of ideas throughout
|
|
Written communication |
The language contains very few, if any, errors in grammar and vocabulary. If slips are present, the meaning is still clear. Conventions of academic writing (e.g. references and presentation) are followed meticulously |
The language is generally accurate but contains some errors in grammar and vocabulary. Conventions of academic writing (e.g. references and presentation) are followed apart from the occasional oversight |
The language is sufficient for understanding but contains errors in grammar and vocabulary that are distracting. Conventions of academic writing (e.g. references and presentation) are followed but show errors and inconsistencies |
Errors in language and vocabulary are frequent and distracting. Does not adhere to the conventions of academic writing (e.g. references and presentation) |
|
Is this report of an appropriate length? Yes No |
||||
|
Comments:
|