ReportMarkingRubric_Homework2.docx

ACCT702: Advanced Financial Accounting

Overall Grade:

Day(s) late:

Revised Grade:

Semester Two 2020

Report Marking Criteria

Stream:

Student Name:

Student ID:

Indicators of

ACHIEVED WITH DISTINCTION

Indicators of

ACHIEVED WITH MERIT

Indicators of

ACHIEVED

Indicators of

NOT ACHIEVED

Addressing the task

Clearly addresses all the requirements and main questions from the assessment brief

Addresses most of the requirements and main questions from the assessment brief

Addresses some the requirements and main questions from the assessment brief

Addresses few of the requirements and main questions from the assessment brief

Evaluation and Discussion

All the required evaluation was completed correctly. Thorough discussion was provided and supported with appropriate examples and information from research

Most of the required evaluation was completed correctly. Discussion was mostly thorough and supported with some relevant examples and research information

Some of the required evaluation was completed correctly. Discussion was mostly descriptive and/or not supported with appropriate examples and research information

The completed evaluation had many significant errors. Discussion had major flaws and/or was not supported with appropriate examples and any research information

Report Structure

Develops ideas logically and coherently with smooth flow throughout the report

Develops ideas coherently but there may be some inconsistencies in the flow through parts of the report

Reasonable attempt made to develop ideas logically but may be lacking in coherence in places

Report is not well structured.

Lacks coherence and logical development of ideas throughout

Written communication

The language contains very few, if any, errors in grammar and vocabulary. If slips are present, the meaning is still clear. Conventions of academic writing (e.g. references and presentation) are followed meticulously

The language is generally accurate but contains some errors in grammar and vocabulary. Conventions of academic writing (e.g. references and presentation) are followed apart from the occasional oversight

The language is sufficient for understanding but contains errors in grammar and vocabulary that are distracting. Conventions of academic writing (e.g. references and presentation) are followed but show errors and inconsistencies

Errors in language and vocabulary are frequent and distracting. Does not adhere to the conventions of academic writing (e.g. references and presentation)

Is this report of an appropriate length? Yes No

Comments: