Energy paper
|
Type |
Environmental Impact |
Extraction Difficulty |
Main benefit of use |
Main drawback of use |
|
Renewables |
||||
|
Hydroelectric power |
Low-Medium |
Easy (as long as water is available) |
Clean from an emissions viewpoint; cost effective |
Harms fish habitat and ecosystems |
|
Wind |
Low-medium |
Becoming easier as technology improves |
Clean, becoming cost effective |
Externalities (noise pollution, aesthetics, bird migration interruption) |
|
Photovoltaics (solar) |
Low |
Research has made it more effective |
Clean, widely available for a variety of uses |
Don’t have sun all the time |
|
Biofuels |
Medium |
Trade-off b/w food and fuel |
Cleaner than non-renewables and abundant |
Still emits greenhouse gases; may impact food supplies and costs |
|
Geothermal |
Low |
Have to have a temp of 220 to generate electricity |
Cleaner |
Costly |
|
Hydrogen |
Medium |
Must separate hydrogen from other elements |
Cleaner fuel source, by product is water |
Often extracted from natural gas, methanol or gasoline; expensive |
· The Clean Power Plan (CPP) and Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) have increased demand for wind and solar
· Tax credits are also incentivizing the upward trend
· Most solar is coming from utility scale installations!
|
Hydroelectric Power · Currently, most power generated by water is done so by dams and the kinetic energy of water release · There might be a way to capture tidal power (listen to NPR segment) NPR Story on November 15, 2017: https :// www.npr.org/2017/11/15/562900887/oceans-may-host-next-wave-of-renewable-energy
|
|
|
Wind Power · Land-based wind energy potential for contiguous US is 10,500 gigawatt capacity at 80 meters and 12,000 GW at 100 meters · Off-shore not as easily qualified because the ocean must be a certain depth and the wind at 80-100 meters must be significant · Wind is profitable if you have wind! · Externalities: It is a bit unsightly, loud and disturbs bird migration patterns (kills an estimated 140,000 to 328,000 birds each year in North America) · Retrofits are trying to fix this problem
|
|
|
|
Solar power Gainesville used to be a leader in solar due to a “Feed-in-tariff (FIT) Program” where customers could sell their energy directly to GRU under a 20 year fixed price contract this served to increase demand in Solar locally and put GNV on the solar map Reported by John Farrell on January 8, 2012: http://grist.org/solar-power/2012-01-06-gainesville-florida-becomes-a-world-leader-in-solar/
|
|
Biofuels · Most energy from biofuel is used in transportation · Renewable fuel standard law (2005): Mandates production of 36 billion of gallons of biofuels by 2022. · Supported by $0.45 subsidy for each gallon of ethanol that is blended with gasoline (higher for cellulosic biofuels) Economic considerations: · Energy balance – How much energy do we get out from each unit of energy put in? For ethanol from corn it is ~ 1.3 · Land use – Higher crop prices influence land conversion rates and increase prices for other food crops · External costs – Water pollution from agriculture as well as groundwater use and air pollution from processing
|
|
Geographic variation is an important consideration:
Primary reasons renewables are a small % of energy produced:
· Cost of fossil fuel has remained relatively low (especially natural gas in recent years)
· External costs of conventional energy are not fully internalized
· Subsidies for conventional energy persist both directly (tax breaks for investments in new wells) and indirectly (spending on infrastructure)
· The best time and place for generating wind and solar energy does not often match demand
· Transmission infrastructure and energy storage technologies are not sufficient
Policy options for increasing renewable energy:
· Carbon pricing: tax or cap and trade (arguably the best option because it correctly aligns incentives and doesn’t require policy makers to pick winner)
· Production subsidies: feed-in tariffs, net metering, production tax credits, construction tax credits
· Research subsidies: for alternative energy
· Renewable portfolio standards: require producers to generate a specific % of energy from renewables
Energy efficiency vs. energy conservation
· Energy efficiency is a measure of the quantity of energy services provided per unit of energy input
· Energy conservation requires a reduction in the total amount of energy consumed
· It is possible to get one without the other (e.g. improve efficiency but still use more energy)
Energy efficiency vs. economic efficiency
· Economic efficiency involves maximizing net social benefits
· Maximizing energy efficiency typically is not economically efficient because energy efficiency is costly
· Bigger question is whether energy efficiency decisions that households and firms make are economically efficient
Energy efficiency gap: difference between what is economically efficient and actual choices of consumers
· Suppose a CFL bulb will save $10 next year compared to an incandescent bulb, but a consumer is only willing to pay at most $5 extra today for the CFL
· This is not economically efficient unless the consumer has another investment opportunity that offers a larger return
Explanations for why consumer might have low WTP for energy efficient technologies:
· Differences in perceived performance between conventional and efficient technology (e.g. belief that cfls do not provide the same quality of light as incandescent bulbs)
· Differing expectations of future energy prices
· Market failure or “behavioral failure”
|
Electricity conservation · Electricity is priced like water, at average cost rather than at marginal costs leading to over-use. · Government encourages investments in low electricity using items (Bush put in effect the requirement to use high efficiency bulbs). · Sometimes utilities implement peak-load pricing during peak times to impose a higher cost to consumers on using it. · Deregulation of electricity has been suggested to remove “regulated monopolies.”
|
|
1