Reflective Revision

MGMT 3210 Habke

Reflective Revision Rubrics

* An F grade indicates a lack of control of the objectives of the assignment

Reflection Rubric A B C D*

C o

n te

n t

(4 0

% )

Reflection is superior. Analysis

indicates excellent control of course

principles, applied in the context of 2-3

improvements (or ongoing challenges)

this term. Use of examples to support

claims is superior.

Reflection is above average. Analysis

indicates above average control of

course principles, applied in the

context of 2-3 improvements (or

ongoing challenges) this term. Use of

examples to support claims is above

average.

Reflection is satisfactory. Analysis

indicates adequate control of course

principles, applied in the context of

2-3 improvements (or ongoing

challenges) this term. Use of

examples to support claims is

satisfactory.

Reflection is marginal. Analysis

indicates marginal control of course

principles, applied in the context of

2-3 improvements (or ongoing

challenges) this term. Use of

examples to support claims is

marginal.

La n

g u

a g

e U

se a

n d

O rg

a n

iz a

ti o

n

(4 0

% )

Writer demonstrates superior control

of organization, both at a macro level

(the full document) and at the micro

level (within each discussion of an

improvement/ongoing challenge).

Language control is superior, in terms

of tone, coherence, clarity, and

efficiency. There are no major errors

and no more than 2-3 minor errors.

Writer demonstrates above average

control of organization, both at a

macro level (the full document) and

at the micro level (within each

discussion of an

improvement/ongoing challenge).

Language control is above average,

in terms of tone, coherence, clarity,

and efficiency. There is no more than

1 major error or 2-3 minor errors.

Writer demonstrates satisfactory

control of organization, both at a

macro level (the full document) and

at the micro level (within each

discussion of an

improvement/ongoing challenge).

Language control is satisfactory, in

terms of tone, coherence, clarity,

and efficiency. There are no more

than two major errors or 4-6 minor

errors.

Writer demonstrates marginal

control of organization, both at a

macro level (the full document) and

at the micro level (within each

discussion of an

improvement/ongoing challenge).

Language control is marginal, in

terms of tone, coherence, clarity,

and efficiency. There may be 2-3

major errors or 4-6 minor errors.

F o

rm a

t a

n d

v is

u a

l D

e si

g n

(1 0

% )

Excellent control of larger assignment

format, according to the guidelines for

content and order.

The reflection’s page design is

excellent, following business standards

(1.15 spacing, with a title, headings,

word count, and other principles of

design, as appropriate).

Above average control of larger

assignment format, according to the

guidelines for content and order.

The reflection’s page design is above

average, following business

standards (1.15 spacing, with a title,

headings, word count, and other

principles of design, as appropriate).

Satisfactory control of larger

assignment format, according to the

guidelines for content and order.

The reflection’s page design is

satisfactory, following business

standards (1.15 spacing, with a title,

headings, word count, and other

principles of design, as appropriate).

Marginal control of larger

assignment format, according to the

guidelines for content and order.

The reflection’s page design is

marginal, following business

standards (1.15 spacing, with a title,

headings, word count, and other

principles of design, as appropriate).

Comments:

MGMT 3210 Habke

Reflective Revision Rubrics

* An F grade indicates a lack of control of the objectives of the assignment

Revision #1 Rubric A B C D*

C o

n te

n t

(4 0

% )

Selection and explanation of content

are superior. Writing demonstrates

excellent decisions in terms of PAIBOC.

Writer has made excellent decisions

about when to include and when to

exclude Information. Ideas are fully

supported with detail and examples, as

needed.

Selection and explanation of content

are above average. Writing

demonstrates strong decisions in

terms of PAIBOC.

Writer has made above average

decisions about when to include and

when to exclude information. Ideas

are mostly supported with detail and

examples, as needed.

Selection and explanation of content

are satisfactory. Writing

demonstrates satisfactory decisions

in terms of PAIBOC.

Writer has made above average

decisions about when to include and

when to exclude information. Ideas

are sometimes supported with detail

and examples, as needed.

Selection and explanation of content

are marginal. Writing demonstrates

weak decisions in terms of PAIBOC.

Writer has made marginal decisions

about when to include and when to

exclude information. Ideas are only

weakly supported with detail and

examples.

La n

g u

a g

e U

se a

n d

O rg

a n

iz a

ti o

n (

4 0

% )

Organization is superior, demonstrating

an excellent understanding of

organizational principles (direct/indirect

writing, clumping of related ideas,

ordering of ideas by importance, and

other). Transitions within and between

paragraphs are very smooth.

Writer demonstrates excellent control

of writer/reader/subject focus.

Language control is superior, in terms

of tone, coherence, clarity, and

efficiency. There are no major errors

and no more than 2-3 minor errors.

Organization is above average,

demonstrating a strong

understanding of organizational

principles (direct/indirect writing,

clumping of related ideas, ordering

of ideas by importance, and other).

Transitions within and between

paragraphs are usually smooth.

Writer demonstrates above average

control of writer/reader/subject

focus. Language control is above

average, in terms of tone, coherence,

clarity, and efficiency. There is no

more than 1 major error or 2-3 minor

errors.

Organization is satisfactory,

demonstrating a moderate

understanding of organizational

principles (direct/indirect writing,

clumping of related ideas, ordering

of ideas by importance, and other).

Transitions within and between

paragraphs are sometimes abrupt.

Writer demonstrates satisfactory

control of writer/reader/subject

focus. Language control is adequate,

in terms of tone, coherence, clarity,

and efficiency. There are no more

than two major errors or 4-6 minor

errors.

Organization is marginal,

demonstrating a weak understanding

of organizational principles

(direct/indirect writing, clumping of

related ideas, ordering of ideas by

importance, and other). Transitions

within and between paragraphs are

frequently abrupt.

Writer demonstrates marginal

control of writer/reader/subject

focus. Language control is weak, in

terms of tone, coherence, clarity,

and efficiency. There may be 2-3

major errors or 4-6 minor errors.

F o

rm a

t a

n d

v is

u a

l

D e

si g

n (

1 0

% )

Writing demonstrates superior control

of format, according to the business

standards discussed in class.

Visual elements help the reader move

through the document with ease.

Writing demonstrates strong control

of format, according to the business

standards discussed in class.

Visual elements help the reader

move through the document.

Writing demonstrates satisfactory

control of format, according to the

business standards discussed in class.

Visual elements provide some

assistance to the reader.

Writing demonstrates marginal

control of format, according to the

business standards discussed in class.

Visual elements provide some

assistance to the reader.

Comments:

MGMT 3210 Habke

Reflective Revision Rubrics

* An F grade indicates a lack of control of the objectives of the assignment

Revision #2 Rubric A B C D*

C o

n te

n t

(4 0

% )

Selection and explanation of content

are superior. Writing demonstrates

excellent decisions in terms of PAIBOC.

Writer has made excellent decisions

about when to include and when to

exclude Information. Ideas are fully

supported with detail and examples, as

needed.

Selection and explanation of content

are above average. Writing

demonstrates strong decisions in

terms of PAIBOC.

Writer has made above average

decisions about when to include and

when to exclude information. Ideas

are mostly supported with detail and

examples, as needed.

Selection and explanation of content

are satisfactory. Writing

demonstrates satisfactory decisions

in terms of PAIBOC.

Writer has made above average

decisions about when to include and

when to exclude information. Ideas

are sometimes supported with detail

and examples, as needed.

Selection and explanation of content

are marginal. Writing demonstrates

weak decisions in terms of PAIBOC.

Writer has made marginal decisions

about when to include and when to

exclude information. Ideas are only

weakly supported with detail and

examples.

La n

g u

a g

e U

se a

n d

O rg

a n

iz a

ti o

n (

4 0

% )

Organization is superior, demonstrating

an excellent understanding of

organizational principles (direct/indirect

writing, clumping of related ideas,

ordering of ideas by importance, and

other). Transitions within and between

paragraphs are very smooth.

Writer demonstrates excellent control

of writer/reader/subject focus.

Language control is superior, in terms

of tone, coherence, clarity, and

efficiency. There are no major errors

and no more than 2-3 minor errors.

Organization is above average,

demonstrating a strong

understanding of organizational

principles (direct/indirect writing,

clumping of related ideas, ordering

of ideas by importance, and other).

Transitions within and between

paragraphs are usually smooth.

Writer demonstrates above average

control of writer/reader/subject

focus. Language control is above

average, in terms of tone, coherence,

clarity, and efficiency. There is no

more than 1 major error or 2-3 minor

errors.

Organization is satisfactory,

demonstrating a moderate

understanding of organizational

principles (direct/indirect writing,

clumping of related ideas, ordering

of ideas by importance, and other).

Transitions within and between

paragraphs are sometimes abrupt.

Writer demonstrates satisfactory

control of writer/reader/subject

focus. Language control is adequate,

in terms of tone, coherence, clarity,

and efficiency. There are no more

than two major errors or 4-6 minor

errors.

Organization is marginal,

demonstrating a weak understanding

of organizational principles

(direct/indirect writing, clumping of

related ideas, ordering of ideas by

importance, and other). Transitions

within and between paragraphs are

frequently abrupt.

Writer demonstrates marginal

control of writer/reader/subject

focus. Language control is weak, in

terms of tone, coherence, clarity,

and efficiency. There may be 2-3

major errors or 4-6 minor errors.

F o

rm a

t a

n d

v is

u a

l

D e

si g

n (

1 0

% )

Writing demonstrates superior control

of format, according to the business

standards discussed in class.

Visual elements help the reader move

through the document with ease.

Writing demonstrates strong control

of format, according to the business

standards discussed in class.

Visual elements help the reader

move through the document.

Writing demonstrates satisfactory

control of format, according to the

business standards discussed in class.

Visual elements provide some

assistance to the reader.

Writing demonstrates marginal

control of format, according to the

business standards discussed in class.

Visual elements provide some

assistance to the reader.

Comments: