| PPMP20018 2020 T1 | Reflective 2: Reflective Report Part A |
| | Rubric |
| | | Superior
| Sufficient
| Insufficient
| Unacceptable
| Not relevant OR not attempted. | Allocated | Comments | | |
| 1. Reflecting on Achievements | Depth of reflection
(Achievements)
| Response demonstrates an in-depth self-reflection on what the student has achieved through their participation in the unit. The reflection indicates a deep consideration of the connection between their achievements and their experiences in the unit.
[2 marks] | Response demonstrates a general self-reflection on what the student has achieved through their participation in the unit. There is some reflection indicating consideration of the connection between their achievements and their experiences in the unit.
[1 mark] | Response demonstrates a minimal self-reflection on what the student has achieved through their participation in the unit. There is little consideration of the connection between their achievements and their experiences in the unit.
[0.5 marks] | Response demonstrates a lack of reflection on what the student has achieved through their participation in the unit. There is no reflection or consideration of the connection between their achievements and their experiences in the unit.
[0.25 marks] | The response is not relevant OR there is no response provided.
[0 marks] |
| | Critical Analysis
(Achievements) | Response demonstrates strong critical analysis rather than simple description. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable
[2 mark] | Response demonstrates reasonable critical analysis rather than simple description. Viewpoints and interpretations are supported. Appropriate examples are provided, as applicable.
[1 mark] | Response demonstrates limited critical analysis and is more descriptive in nature. Viewpoints and interpretations are unsupported or supported with flawed arguments. The examples provided are vague or general in nature.
[0.5 marks] | There is no evidence of critical analysis and the description is generalised and/or vague. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples are not provided or the relevance of the examples provided is questionable or not clear.
[0.25 marks] | The response is not relevant OR there was no response provided.
[0 marks] |
| | Implication to PM
Practice and Industry readiness
(Achievements)
| The implications of these insights for the respondent's overall project management practice and industry readiness are thoroughly detailed and indicate an advanced understanding of these achievements in professional careers.
[1 mark] | The implications of these insights for the respondent's overall project management practice and industry readiness are presented and indicate some understanding of these achievements in professional careers.
[0.75 marks] | Implications of these insights for the respondent's overall project management practice or industry readiness are presented and/or indicate limited understanding of these achievements in professional careers.
[0.25 marks] | No implications for the respondent's overall project management practice or industry readiness are presented.
[0 marks] | The response is not relevant OR there was no response provided.
[0 marks] |
| Reflections on Design Thinking | Depth of reflection
(Design Thinking)
| Response demonstrates an in-depth self-reflection on the design thinking process. The reflection indicates a deep consideration of the connection between design thinking and their experiences in the unit.
[2 marks] | Response demonstrates a general reflection on the design thinking process. There is some reflection indicating consideration of the connection between design thinking and their experiences in the unit.
[1 mark] | Response demonstrates a minimal reflection on the design thinking process. There is little consideration of the connection between design thinking and their experiences in the unit.
[0.5 marks] | Response demonstrates a lack of reflection on the design thinking process. There is no reflection or consideration of the connection between design thinking and their experiences in the unit.
[0.25 marks] | The response is not relevant OR there is no response provided.
[0 marks] |
| | Critical Analysis
(Design Thinking) | Response demonstrates strong critical analysis rather than simple description. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable
[2 mark]
| Response demonstrates reasonable critical analysis rather than simple description. Viewpoints and interpretations are supported. Appropriate examples are provided, as applicable.
[1 mark]
| Response demonstrates limited critical analysis and is more descriptive in nature. Viewpoints and interpretations are unsupported or supported with flawed arguments. Examples, when applicable, are not provided or are irrelevant to the assignment.
[0.5 marks]
| There is no evidence of critical analysis and the description is generalised and/or vague. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples, when applicable, are not provided.
[0.25 marks] | The response is not relevant OR there was no response provided.
[0 marks] |
| | Implication to PM
Practice and Industry readiness
(Design thinking) | The implications of these insights for the respondent's overall project management practice and industry readiness are thoroughly detailed and indicate a thorough understanding of how design thinking can be incorporated in their future careers.
[1 mark] | The implications of these insights for the respondent's overall project management practice and industry readiness are presented and indicate some understanding of how design thinking can be incorporated in their future careers.
[0.75 marks] | Implications of these insights for the respondent's overall project management practice or industry readiness are presented and/or indicate limited understanding of how design thinking can be incorporated in their future careers.
[0.25 marks] | No implications for the respondent's overall project management practice or industry readiness are presented.
[0 marks] | The response is not relevant OR there was no response provided.
[0 marks] |
| 3. Experiencing challenges in projects | Depth of reflection
(Challenges)
| Response demonstrates an in-depth self-reflection on the challenges faced by the student during their participation in the unit. The reflection indicates a deep consideration of the connection between their reaction to the challenges and their experiences in the unit.
[2 marks] | Response demonstrates a general self-reflection on challenges faced by the student during their participation in the unit. There is some reflection indicating consideration of the connection between their reaction to the challenges and their experiences in the unit.
[1 mark] | Response demonstrates a minimal self-reflection on the challenges faced by the student during their participation in the unit. There is little consideration of the connection between their reaction to the challenges and their experiences in the unit.
[0.5 marks] | Response demonstrates a lack of reflection on the challenges faced by the student during their participation in the unit. There is no reflection or consideration of the connection between their reaction to the challenges and their experiences in the unit.
[0.25 marks] | The response is not relevant OR there is no response provided.
[0 marks] |
| | Critical Analysis
(Challenges) | Response demonstrates strong critical analysis rather than simple description. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable
[2 mark] | Response demonstrates reasonable critical analysis rather than simple description. Viewpoints and interpretations are supported. Appropriate examples are provided, as applicable.
[1 mark] | Response demonstrates limited critical analysis and is more descriptive in nature. Viewpoints and interpretations are unsupported or supported with flawed arguments. The examples provided are vague or general in nature.
[0.5 marks] | There is no evidence of critical analysis and the description is generalised and/or vague. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples are not provided or the relevance of the examples provided is questionable or not clear.
[0.25 marks] | The response is not relevant OR there was no response provided.
[0 marks] |
| | Implication to PM
Practice and Industry readiness
(Challenges)
| The implications of these insights for the respondent's overall project management practice and industry readiness are thoroughly detailed and indicate an advanced understanding of dealing with challenges in professional careers.
[1 mark] | The implications of these insights for the respondent's overall project management practice and industry readiness are presented and indicate some understanding of dealing with challenges in professional careers.
[0.75 marks] | Implications of these insights for the respondent's overall project management practice or industry readiness are presented and/or indicate limited understanding of dealing with challenges in professional careers.
[0.25 marks] | No implications for the respondent's overall project management practice or industry readiness are presented.
[0 marks] | The response is not relevant OR there was no response provided.
[0 marks] |
| Take Action | Depth of reflection
(Action)
| Response demonstrates an in-depth self-reflection on taking the action required. The reflection indicates a deep consideration of the connection between what they learnt by taking this action and their experiences in the unit.
[2 marks] | Response demonstrates a general self-reflection on taking the action required. There is some reflection indicating consideration of the connection between what they learnt by taking this action their experiences in the unit.
[1 mark] | Response demonstrates a minimal self-reflection on taking the action required. There is little consideration of the connection between what they learnt by taking this action and their experiences in the unit.
[0.5 marks] | Response demonstrates a lack of reflection on taking the action required. There is no reflection or consideration of the connection between what they learnt by taking this action and their experiences in the unit.
[0.25 marks] | The response is not relevant OR there is no response provided.
[0 marks]
[0 marks] |
| | Implication to PM
Practice and Industry readiness
(Action)
| The implications of these insights for the respondent's overall project management practice and industry readiness are thoroughly detailed and indicate an advanced understanding of dealing with challenges in professional careers.
[1 mark] | The implications of these insights for the respondent's overall project management practice and industry readiness are presented and indicate some understanding of dealing with challenges in professional careers.
[0.75 marks] | Implications of these insights for the respondent's overall project management practice or industry readiness are presented and/or indicate limited understanding of dealing with challenges in professional careers.
[0.25 marks] | No implications for the respondent's overall project management practice or industry readiness are presented.
[0 marks] | The response is not relevant OR there was no response provided.
[0 marks] |
| Overall Quality | Quality
| Writing is clear, concise, and well organized with excellent sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a
coherent and logical manner. There are no spelling, grammar, or syntax errors.
[1 mark] | Writing is mostly clear, concise, and well organized with good sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent
and logical manner. There are no more than three spelling, grammar, or syntax errors in total.
[0.75 marks] | Writing is unclear and/or disorganized. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner. There are more than six spelling,
grammar, or syntax errors in total.
[0.5 marks] | Writing is unclear and disorganized. Thoughts ramble and make little
sense. There are numerous (over six in total) spelling, grammar, or syntax errors.
[0.25 marks] | The response is not relevant OR there was no response provided.
[0 marks] |
| Student's Self Assessment using the rubric | Self-Assessment
| The student has used this rubric correctly and completely to self-assess their report.
[1 mark] | The student has used this rubric to self-assess their report and they have correctly used the rubric for at least eight of the rows.
[0.75 marks] | The student has used this rubric to self-assess their report and they have correctly used the rubric for at least five of the rows.
[0.5 marks] | The student has used this rubric to self-assess their report and they have correctly used the rubric for at least three of the rows.
[0.25] | The response is not relevant OR there was no response provided.
[0 marks] |
| | | | | | | Total Allocated | 0 |
| | | | | | | Penalty (-5% [-1] per day ) |
| | | | | | | Marks for uploading to Moodle | 0 | | 1 |
| | Rubric adapted from (https://teachingcommons.lakeheadu.ca/sites/default/files/inline-files/reflection_rubric.pdf) |
MAHI@007
Reflective2PartBRubric2020t1v03.xlsx
