Reflection Paper - 24 Hours HLTH -556

profilejhayes
ReflectionPaperRubric.docx

HLTH 556 Worldview Reflection Rubric

Criteria 

Levels of Achievement 

Content 70% 

Advanced 92-100% (A) 

Proficient 84-91% (B) 

Developing 1-83% (< C) 

Not present 

Personal Perception

18- 16.5 points

Provides several perceptions of how their worldview influences their viewpoint on the current healthcare debate.

16.49- 15.0 points

Provides some perceptions of how their worldview influences their viewpoint on the current healthcare debate

14-1 points

Perceptions are discussed, but there is very little connection of how their worldview influences their viewpoint on the current healthcare debate

0 points 

Does not provide how their worldview influences their viewpoint on the current healthcare debate

Reflection

18- 16.5 points

Shows great clarity on their current worldview and how that affects their value of healthcare for the needy

16.49- 15.0 points

Shows clarity on their current worldview, and how that affects their value of healthcare for the needy

14-1 points

Shows limited clarity on their current worldview and how that affects their value of healthcare for the needy

0 points 

Shows no clarity on their current worldview and how that affects their value of healthcare for the need 

Biblical support/ value support

17-15.5 points

Defends with clarity their worldview with several biblical passages or defined value statements that support healthcare for the needy.

15-14 points

Defends their worldview with several biblical passages or defined value statements that support healthcare for the needy

13-1 points

Defends their worldview with few biblical passages or defined value statements that support healthcare for the needy.  

0 points 

Missing biblical support 

Structure 30% 

Advanced 92-100% (A) 

Proficient 84-91% (B) 

Developing 1-83% (< C) 

Not present 

Mechanics, Format, & Length 

22 - 20 points

Well-written with correct grammar, spelling and formatting. Length requirement is met.

19 – 17 points

Well-written with a few grammar, spelling, and/or formatting errors. Length requirement is met.

17 -1 points

Generally readable, but with several errors in spelling, grammar, and formatting. Length requirement met.

0 points 

The paper does not meet length requirement, and/or demonstrates extremely poor grammar, spelling, and/or formatting. 

Instructors comments:

/75