Research
HSCO 511
Reflection Paper Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Below Expectations |
Not Present |
Points Earned |
|
|
Content: 70% |
|||||
|
Content |
33 to 35 points · Addresses all required aspects of the topic in sufficient depth & detail. · Demonstrates self-reflection, critical thinking & application. · Meets length parameters. |
30 to 32 points · Addresses most required aspects of the topic in sufficient depth & detail. · Demonstrates some reflection, critical thinking & application. · Length is acceptable. |
27 to 29 points · Addresses some required aspects of the topic; depth & detail may be lacking. · Some critical reflection & application may be implied. · May violate length parameters. |
1 to 26 points · Addresses required aspects of the topic to a limited extent. · Self-reflection, critical thinking & application is lacking. · May violate length parameters. |
0 points |
|
|
Sources & Support |
33 to 35 points · Provides specific observations & examples. · Incorporates required sources in a meaningful way. · Integrates biblical worldview perspectives. |
30 to 32 points · Provides some observations & examples. · Incorporates required sources in some way. · Makes inferences based on a biblical worldview. |
27 to 29 points · Provides a few observations & examples. · Cites required sources but lacks discussion. · Biblical worldview may be implied. |
1 to 26 points · Observations & examples are vague or missing. · Required sources may not be incorporated. · Biblical worldview may not be evident. |
0 points |
|
|
|
Structure: 30% |
|||||
|
Organization |
10 points · Well organized with an engaging introduction, a logic progression of ideas & transitions that are clear & maintain flow of thought. · Focused & concise with main points sufficiently developed. |
9 points · Generally well organized with a good introduction, progression of ideas & transitions that are clear & maintain flow of thought. · Focused & concise with main points somewhat developed. |
8 points · May lack an engaging introduction, a logic progression of ideas and/or transitions that are clear & effective to maintain flow. · Focus may be lacking & main points needing development. |
1 to 7 points · Organization is poor. · There may be a lack of focus; ideas may be vague, confusing or underdeveloped.
|
0 points |
|
|
Grammar & Mechanics |
10 points · Spelling, grammar, punctuation, & capitalization is correct. · Sentences are coherent, complete, clear & varied. · Choice of words, tense & tone is appropriate. |
9 points · Spelling, grammar, punctuation, & capitalization is acceptable. · Sentences are generally coherent, complete & clear. · Choice of words, tense & tone is acceptable. |
8 points · Spelling, grammar, punctuation, or capitalization is incorrect. · Sentence structure needs to be developed. · Word choice, tense, or tone may be problematic. |
1 to 7 points · Multiple writing, grammar, or sentence structure errors are present. |
0 points |
|
|
Format & Style |
10 points · Title page, header, margins font, spacing & heading are consistent with APA style. · References & in-text citations correspond & are correct. |
9 points · Title page, header, margins font, spacing & heading are generally in APA style. · References & in-text citations correspond & are correct. |
8 points · Title page, header, margins font, spacing & heading are inconsistent with APA style. · References & in-text citations may conflict or be incorrect. |
1 to 7 points · The paper does not adhere to APA format.
|
0 points |
|
|
Total: |
|
/100 |