Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Note Part 1
bosslady70
ReflectionNote.docx
· Submit Part 2 of your Week 4 Assignment.
submission information - Part 2prehensive Psychiatric Evaluation note
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK4AssgnPt2_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
PRAC_6645_Week4_Assignment2_PT2_Rubric
|
PRAC_6645_Week4_Assignment2_PT2_Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome: Reflections on this case. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentReflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking. ... Reflections contain all 3 elements from the assignment directions including a discussion demonstrating critical thinking of the case related to the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates. Clearly and concisely relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field. 4 to >3.5 ptsGoodReflections demonstrate critical thinking. ... Reflections demonstrate critical thinking. ... Reflections contain 2 of the elements from the assignment directions with one being a basic discussion of the case related to the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates. Clearly relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field. 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairReflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking. ... Reflections contain 1 of the required elements from the assignment directions which is the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates. ... Somewhat vaguely or inaccurately relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field. 3 to >0 ptsPoorReflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. ... There are no Reflections elements from the assignment directions (no HeathlyPeople 2030 social health determinates, no health promotion, and no education activity). ... Missing discussion relating to the psychiatric and mental health field or relates discussion to another specialty realm including medical co-morbidity illnesses. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation documentation |
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Preceptor signature and date pdf/image is uploaded on the completed assignment (not an electronic signature). 17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Preceptor signature and date pdf/image is uploaded on the completed assignment but is an electronic signature. 15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case, with some vagueness and inaccuracy Preceptor signature and date pdf/image is uploaded on the completed assignment but is an electronic signature. 13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response incompletely and inaccurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. No preceptor signature. |
20 pts |
Total Points: 25
