smith . DI
Brucele
ReferralKB7038.pdf
Referral KB7038 by Chaitanya Srivenkateswara MALAPATI
Submission date: 26-Aug-2021 03:17AM (UTC+0100) Submission ID: 159194028 File name: ChaitanyaRBIM.doc (6.27M) Word count: 4527 Character count: 28013
FINAL GRADE
72/100 Referral KB7038 GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
Areas of good practice:
1. The Smith Dock's project is very well presented in the coursework with all the details related to the project and its management.
2. The analysis of the project challenges is good.
3. Good solutions are provided for the identified challenges.
Areas of potential improvement:
1. More discussions regarding the specific solutions to the Smith Docks project could have helped instead of generic introduction to the solution.
2. The coursework is over the word-limit, so the first 4400 words are marked.
3. The introduction is too lengthy and not relevant to the coursework.
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
PAGE 11
PAGE 12
PAGE 13
PAGE 14
PAGE 15
PAGE 16
PAGE 17
PAGE 18
PAGE 19
PAGE 20
PAGE 21
PAGE 22
PAGE 23
PAGE 24
PAGE 25
PAGE 26
PAGE 27
PAGE 28
GRADING FORM: KB7038-RUBRIC 3
PRESENTATION (0-15)
Quality of presentation (including writing style, visualisation, and formatting)
ANALYSIS (0-30)
Depth of analysis of the project (planning and construction management requirements) for assessing the role of BIM for improving the planning and management practices
RELEVANCE (0-30)
Relevance of the proposed BIM-based solutions to the identified requirements and challenges (the justifications of solutions)
CHAITANYA SRIVENKATESWARA MALAPATI
72
10
25
PRACTICALITY (0-25)
Applying disciplinary knowledge to multi-disciplinary skills to demonstration of practicality of the proposed BIM-based solutions (how to implement the solutions)
20
17
