Ethnography report

jacobmartin

referralethnogrpahyCOVID19options3.docx

Home >Social Science homework help >Ethnography report

Submission Deadline

Marks and Feedback

Before 10am on:

15/05/2020

20 working days after deadline (L4, 5 and 7) 15 working days after deadline (L6) 10 working days after deadline (block delivery)

Unit title & code	Qualitative Research
Assignment number and title	Assessment 2
Assignment type	Referral Ethnographic Research Project
Weighting of assignment	70%
Size or length of assessment	2000 words
Unit learning outcomes

What am I required to do in this assignment?

Learning Outcomes

On completion of this unit you should be able to

1. Demonstrate the following knowledge and understanding Demonstrate knowledge and practical understanding of the qualitative approaches to research; philosophies, methodologies, methods and tools of analysis

2. Demonstrate the following skills and abilities Apply knowledge and understanding of qualitative research to the design and implementation of a research study

This task gives you the chance to experience ‘doing qualitative research’ in a sport, physical activity or education setting of your choice. This task requires you to utilise the tools of naturalistic qualitative research: interviewing, (participant) observation, and analysis of the data you generate. You will design, gain consent for, and conduct a small piece of fieldwork that has been approved by the unit leader, and critically analyse your data.

What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from UIF)

In order to pass Assessment 2 you will need to:

Successfully complete an empirical study that critically explores a relevant and contemporary social issue within Sport/PE/Physical Activity

Demonstrate understanding of your research design, appropriate methods of data collection and tools of analysis Critically support your findings and emergent themes though clear reference to the relevant supporting academic lens

How do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade?

High quality work in assessment 2 directly relates to your attendance and quality of your workbook.

COVID 19 amendments:

1. If you have already done your time in the setting and have your data then the original criteria stands-

To do this assignment you must have sent your approved letter to the gatekeeper, done your reading and discussed the issues with the unit coordinator to get the focus and setting approved. Overt research settings only.

You need to understand the ethical procedures and Personal Data Information and have all the necessary consent forms, and observation sheets available for use.

You must observe in relevant settings and use the observation sheets to create rich description from which you will eventually code and suggest critical social meaning.

You probably failed the write up so this time -Please see the in depth mark sheet that indicates how to structure this research paper and what is expected in each heading. The ability to critically write is key to a good mark.

Use the headings suggested (plus see the subheadings on the mark sheet)

2. If you have NOT managed to spend time in a setting yet;

You are living a unique ‘ethnographic setting’ that is COVID 19 lockdown, it has affected all aspects of social life especially sport and physical activity, PE practices. You should think of a unique issue that starts from your or your families experience or from the media – I sent some examples to you. How are people adapting to exercise regimes now they cannot go to the gym/clubs/school etc? What are the themes emerging from this lock down and PA/football/ PE? Still adhering to the ethical guidelines -You can interview your family, friends via online platforms, or through socials – be inventive. Remember the topic you choose has to have a good theoretical underpinning – for example – identity, fandom, etc

If you are living with family you can observe them and use observation sheets – do they get frustrated not being able to watch their team/go to the gym? You can then code the interviews

(You will not have to have a gatekeeper letter or one from the setting in option 2)

Introduction

Review of literature

Research design

Ethics

Tools of analysis

Critical analysis

(this makes up your 2000 words everything else below is not counted in the word count)

Reference page

Appendices

Every section must be written in academic style – using various qualitative and academic authors to continually set up arguments and decisions about your design and then again to analyse your findings.

Your appendices has to include all the required paperwork;

All observation sheets coded, dated etc

Your gatekeeper letter

A reply from the organization supporting your time in the setting.

Consent forms

Participation Information form

5 minutes of the interview transcribed and coded.

How does this assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions?

This unit will provide you with an overview of qualitative research methods which can be used to answer the ‘whys’ and ‘hows’ of human behaviour, perspective and experience in physical activity, sport and education contexts. Building on the knowledge and skills gained at Level 4, this unit will enhance your understanding of the research process in qualitative studies, a range of qualitative methodologies and methods of data collection and generation, and important ethical issues in research. This unit serves as preparation for Level 5 dissertation preparation and Level 6 dissertation or work experience project units

Assessment 1 was focused on 8 weeks of practical in-class tasks and research scenarios that built up your ‘qualitative skills set’. Full attendance will give you the toolkit needed to succeed. Observational, organizational, ethical and analytical skills will be developed well enough for you to succeed in a small piece of fieldwork of your own.

How will my assignment be marked?

Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page. You can use them to evaluate your own work and consider your grade before you submit.

3rd Class – 40-49%

Lower 2nd – 50-59%

Upper 2nd – 60-69%

1st Class – 70%+

1 Knowledge and Understanding

Adequate grasp of the topic but with significant shortcomings.

There may be some omissions in terms of literature, or the methodology, methods and design should have been developed more fully. Adequate analysis and evaluation of empirical data, leading to the development of appropriate and clearly stated conclusions.

Secure understanding of the key content and concepts. Empirical data well analysed and integrated in assessed work. Conclusions will be sound and clearly relate to the literature presented in the project.

Concisely justifies the selection and application of appropriate research design with reflective discussion of research process and/or possible alternatives. Data collection meticulously conducted and empirical data fully analysed / represented using appropriate techniques..

2 Interpretation and evaluation of subject material

Quality of analysis and evaluation inconsistent with superficial evidence of empirical data to support reasoning

Adequate analysis and evaluation of empirical data, leading to the development of appropriate and clearly stated conclusions.

Empirical data well analysed and integrated in assessed work. Conclusions will be sound and clearly relate to the literature presented in the project.

Interpretation / explanation of analysis theoretically/conceptually grounded throughout

3 Structure and presentation of material and referencing style.

On occasion, communication is compromised by poor expression, limited vocabulary or errors. Structure may be illogical and referencing inconsistent.

Work shows basic structure and clarity but errors may be evident. An attempt at UoB Harvard referencing is identified but there are a number of inaccuracies.

Work shows very good structure and is logical and clear. Referencing is mostly consistent and accurate in line with the UoB Harvard style.

Work shows excellent structure and is fluent and clear. Sources are effectively referenced throughout and adhere to the UoB Harvard style.

4 Relevance and quality of research and referencing sources

Limited levels of self-expression based on core material. There may be significant omissions in terms of literature and/or methodology, although key sources will have been used to offer some research focus.

Acceptable levels of self-expression based on good to adequate working knowledge and understanding of material to focus research.

The project will be characterised by competence in all sections Clear writing with a well-defined focus, reflecting a good working knowledge of material and good competence in its critical assessment.

Work of an excellent standard evidencing lucid writing with a clearly defined focus informed by and through detailed and up-to-date reading reflecting outstanding knowledge of material and depth of critical thinking. Research objectives are clearly stated and their theoretical development from existing literature demonstrated.

Submit assignment

Completing Your Assignment

Marks and Feedback

Marks and feedback