nursing research paper on infection

References

Amer-Alshiek, J., Alshiek, T., Almog, B., Lessing, J. B., Satel, A., Many, A., & Levin, I. (2013). Can we reduce the surgical site infection rate in cesarean sections using a chlorhexidine-based antisepsis protocol? The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 26(17), 1749-1752. doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.798291

Kunkle, C. M., Marchan, J., Safadi, S., Whitman, S., & Chmait, R. H. (2014). Chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone iodine at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine,28(5), 573-577. doi:10.3109/14767058.2014.926884

Salama, F. A., Yehia, A. H., Wahba, K. A., & Abdelmoniem, R. M. (2016). Efficacy and safety of chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine skin antisepsis in reducing surgical site infection in cesarean sections. Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal, 6(1), 32-36. doi:10.1097/01.ebx.0000479690.07770.cb

Srinivas, A., Kaman, L., Raj, P., Gautam, V., Dahiya, D., Singh, G., . . . Medhi, B. (2014). Comparison of the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone iodine as preoperative skin preparation for the prevention of surgical site infections in clean-contaminated upper abdominal surgeries. Surgery Today,45(11), 1378-1384. doi:10.1007/s00595-014-1078-y

Steiner, H. L., & Strand, E. A. (2017). Surgical-site infection in gynecologic surgery: pathophysiology and prevention. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,217(2), 121-128. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.014

Tuuli, M. G., MD, M., Liu, J., Ph.D., Stout, M. J., MD, M., Martin, S., RN, . . . Macones, G. A., MD. (2016). A Randomized Trial Comparing Skin Antiseptic Agents at Cesarean Delivery. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(7), 647-655. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1511048