Reference List

profilesneakerhead200
ReferenceListGradingChecklist.docx

Reference List Grading Checklist

Performance Level Ratings

Meets Expectations

Performance consistently met expectations in all essential areas of project construction and/or recording, at times possibly exceeding expectations, and the quality of work overall was very good. The most critical goals were met.

Near Expectations

Performance did not consistently meet expectations. Performance failed to meet expectations in one or more essential areas of project construction and/or recording, one or more of the most critical goals were not met.

Below Expectations

Performance was consistently below expectations in most essential areas of project construction and/or recording, reasonable progress toward critical goals was not made. Significant improvement is needed in one or more important areas.

Assignment Criteria

Below Expectations

Near Expectations

Meets Expectations

Earned

Title page, APA formatted.

0 pts – 6 pts

7 pts – 9 pts

10 pts

Description is succinct and clearly explains the topic.

0 pts – 3 pts

12 pts – 19 pts

20 pts

Research question is well worded and appropriate for the topic description.

0 pts – 6 pts

7 pts – 9 pts

10 pts

At least 10 references are listed, all less than 5 years old.

0 pts – 17 pts

18 pts – 29 pts

30 pts

All references include the permalink or persistent link.

0 pts – 6 pts

7 pts – 9 pts

10 pts

References are from appropriate sources including at least 1 book and 5 journals.

0 pts – 6 pts

7 pts – 9 pts

10 pts

There are virtually no errors in APA documentation format or citations; all sources are authoritative.

0 pts – 1 pts

2 pts – 4 pts

10 pts

TOTAL

/100

Instructor Feedback