strategic marketing report part 5,6,7, ONLY

profilegladyss
ref1.docx

Screen%20Shot%202017-04-13%20at%2012.01.34%20PM.png

Table of Contents 1. Company Overview 4 1.1 Tigerair’s Past Strategies 4 1.2 Key Milestones and Analysis 4 1.3 Current Situation 6 2. External Environment Analysis 7 2.1 Pestle Analysis 7 2.2 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis 10 2.3 Industry Life Cycle 13 2.4 Competition Analysis 14 3. Customer Analysis 16 3.1 Market Size and Profitability 16 3.2 Market Segmentation 17 4. Company Internal Analysis 18 4.1 Porter’s Value Chain of Company 18 4.1.1 Primary Activities 19 4.1.2 Supporting Activities 20 4.2 Collaborators 22 4.3 VRIN Framework 23 5. SWOT Analysis 23 5.1 SWOT 23 5.2 TOWS 26 6. Corporate Strategy Analysis 27 6.1 SIA Mission and Values 27 6.2 Current SIA Strategies 28 6.3 Latest Acquisition 28 6.4 Line of Business 29 6.4.1 Horizontal Integration 29 6.4.2 Backward Integration 29 6.4.3 Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix 30 6.5 Corporate Strategy 30 7. Business Strategy Analysis 31 7.1 Tiger air’s Current Business Strategy 31 7.2 Functional Strategies 31 7.3 Evaluation of Current Business Strategy 32 7.4 New Business Strategy 33 7.5 Implications of New Business Strategy 33 8. Recommendations 35 8.1 Recommended Strategies 35 8.2 Implementation of Recommendations 37 8.2.1 Marketing Plan 37 9. Conclusion 40 10. References 41

1. Company Overview

Tigerair (TA), a subsidiary of Singapore Airlines (SIA) Limited, was formed in 2003. It is now a well-known low-cost carrier (LCC) in Singapore. It provides passenger transportation and some additional services (e.g. hotel bookings and travel insurance). Furthermore, mobile application services and web based check-in services are also offered by TA.

1.1 Tigerair’s Past Strategies

TA focused on aggressive regional expansion (Koh & Choo 2016). This involves expanding fleet sizes and into other countries (such as Australia, Philippines and Indonesia) to increase its profits and market share.

1.2 Key Milestones and Analysis

2004 - Current | Leadership of Tiger Airways

In 2004, Patrick Gan was selected to be the CEO of TA, however, he was inexperienced in the airline industry. He had then resigned in 2005 as he is incapable of managing airline company.

After Gan’s resignation, Anthony Davis, who was formerly a director of low-cost British carrier airline, took over Gan’s position. It was also Davis’ first time focusing on Asian budget travellers. Under Davis’ leadership, he failed to anticipate the situation for the market development in Indonesia and there was also no backup plan for the setback (Koh & Choo 2016).

Lee Lik Hsin has a 20-year working experience in SIA before becoming the CEO of TA. Under the leadership of Lee, there was an improvement on the financial performance of TA as it was reported that a profit of SGD 14.6 million was made in 2016, having an increment of 3.8% as compared to FY2015 (MarketLine 2016).

Lee also strongly believed that with the integration into the SIA family, TA’s current situation will improve (Koh & Choo 2016). To better integrate with Scoot, TA also adopted their fun and relaxed personality (Kaur 2016).

2006 - 2007 | Fleet Expansion

To compete with other airlines, TA doubles its fleet size to four A320 planes with orders of eight new planes and to be delivered in 2006 and 2007. Furthermore, TA had placed an order of 50 Airbus 320 aircraft in 2007 on firm contract. With this, TA aims to increase its profits and market growth. Thus, achieving a profit of S$37.8 million (USD 27.6 million) in 2008.

2010 - 2012 | Safety & Remuneration Issues

In 2010, many customers were affected by cancellation of flights due to technical faults from planes and many pilots resigned over salary matters from TA Singapore.

Moreover, in 2011, all TA Australia was grounded by Australia’s Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) over safety concerns. However, it is resolved in October 2012. Furthermore, during the restriction period, TA Singapore had to absorb the extra cost of four new planes that is initially for TA Australia.

The sudden cancellation of flights and technical problems will therefore cause customers to lose confidence in TA.

2010 - 2015 | Initial Public Offering (IPO)

Between year 2010 to 2015, TA was listed on the Main board of Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited and had raised funds through several rights issues. The funds were raised for the payment of new planes. Furthermore, Ryanasia and Indigo Singapore Partners divested their shares as TA was not able to pay any dividends in 2010. Thus, implying that TA was having financial problems during the years.

2012 - 2014 | Acquisition of Tigerair Australia

To help fund expansion of TA Australia, TA sold 60% shares of TA Australia to Virgin Australia Holdings in 2012. It was then renamed to become “Tigerair Australia”.

Moreover, TA struggled in the Australian market and had suffered losses for seven years as it was intensely competitive. Thus, deciding to exit the market. Virgin Australia Holdings then helped TA to overcome its financial difficulties by buying all the remaining shares for A$1 in 2014 while TA continues getting brand licensing fees from TA Australia.

2012 – 2014 | Expansion to Indonesia & Philippines

In 2012, TA expanded to both Indonesia and Philippines. However, due to industry overcapacity, after the expansion, TA Philippines failed to survive in the Philippines market and sold its 40% shares to Cebu Pacific in 2014. On the other hand, TA Mandala stopped operating in 2014 as it could not sustain financially.

2015 - 2016 | Subsidiary of SIA

Lee suggested that “the key element for a decisive turnaround and for future sustainable growth” is to integrate with SIA. Thus, a decision was made to integrate Scoot and TA in the second half of 2017 (Tang 2016).

Initially, SIA owns 40% shares of TA. However, in 2015, after the injection of fund, SIA became the largest shareholder in TA with 55.8% ownership. After Singapore Airlines (SIA) had obtained more than 90% shares of TA, TA was delisted from Singapore Exchange (SGX) (Ramchandani 2016).

It is beneficial for TA to be part of SIA as it can leverage on strategic alliance of SIA and Scoot to enhance network connectivity, increase market access and share technology resources for better online transactions.

1.3 Current Situation

Despite displaying strong financial performance in 2016, TA is unable to operate as a solo unit as it was announced that it is still going to come under the name of Scoot by the end of 2017. TA also facing an intense competition in the LCC industry as there are other airlines such as AirAsia and JetStar which have higher market share and fleets than TA.

2. External Environment Analysis

2.1 Pestle Analysis

Political-Legal Factors

In January 2005, Indonesian authorities informed Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) that foreign LCCs will not be granted access to bigger cities but only to smaller Indonesian cities (Choo & Koh 2016).

In addition, the Ministry of Transportation of Indonesia made an impact on airline tariffs by passing new legislation in 2016 (Euromonitor International 2016). In order to protect the consumers, the new legislation involves decreasing the minimum and maximum tariffs by 5% in response to lower jet fuel prices.

The Open Skies agreement (aka ASEAN Single Aviation Market), which allows carriers from all 10 member nations (of ASEAN) to fly freely within the region. The agreement will boost travel around the region, help increase trade between the nations (Giridharadas 2016).

Furthermore, in 2017, TA Australia was forced to cease flights between Australia and Bali as there were conflicts with the Indonesian authorities (Ironside 2017). In addition, the solution would take about six months and it will compromise TA Australia’s ability to provide a low-cost air transportation to passengers (ABC News 2017). Therefore, TA made the decision of suspending the route permanently.

New ruling by the International Civil Aviation Organisation to replace Tokyo Convention with Montreal Protocol. Under current law, Singapore can only act towards unruly passengers if only he/she arrives on Singapore carriers. To overcome such issue, Montreal Protocol will be replacing Tokyo Convention. Singapore will also toughen its own regulations to deter against unruly behaviour.

The new laws will ensure safe and secure air hubs and seamless service by airlines.

Economic Factors

It is expected in 2016 that 1% of the world Gross Domestic Product (GDP) will be contributed in air transport which amounted to $740 billion (IATA 2016).

In addition, fuel prices are also being predicted an increment of $129 billion in 2017 and this will lead to an increment in operating costs on average by 18.7%. There will also be a rise in labour costs in the airline industry (Bachman 2017).

With Singapore having a slower economic growth rate ahead, LCCs are able to benefit from it with its affordable offering as consumers are more price conscious (Chia 2017).

Furthermore, the U.S. interest rate hike has caused many Asian countries’ exchange rates to be affected thus causing its citizens to be more frugal. (Chia 2017).

Socio-Cultural Factors

There is a high demand for passenger travel as it is estimated to rise by 6.9%, with 3.8 billion passengers to travel in 2016 (MarketLine 2016). With this, Tiger Airways may broaden its geographic boundary.

Moreover, there is psychographic and behavioural change in consumers in the airline industry. Initially, before the rising trend of low-cost carries, those ‘high-paying business travellers’ were more willing to pay for any price but, after the trend, they became more price-sensitive towards the idea of paying more to travel (Teichert, Shehu & von Wartburg 2008).

In addition, due to Singapore being a small country and densely populated, citizens constantly feel a need to have a getaway and travel overseas for holidays (Lim 2016). Furthermore, there are two factors that will affect the Perception of Quality by local and foreign passengers for Budget Airlines (CSISG 2016). They are the cabin’s cleanliness and choices of food and beverage.  

Technological Factors

Artificial intelligence could serve as digital assistant in the front-line operation for the airline. Using AI, airline can create a seamless travel experience and will be able to eliminate any human errors (BBC News 2017). More developed AI, however, will be able to provide more usage such as market intelligence, revenue management and many more that can bring competitive advantage to the airline. It can improve efficiency, drive down costs, increase customer satisfaction and potentially elevate revenue.

The use of virtual reality is not unheard of in the airline industry. Qantas have tested VR as an in-flight entertainment and using a VR app for marketing purposes such as providing immersive videos of Australian destinations (CNBC 2017).

Augmented reality can assist in wayfinding, entertainment and provide AR billboards that displays information. In 2016, Emirates offered the first interactive amenity kits in the industry (Emirates 2017). Implementing AR technology, Emirates customers can enjoy digital entertainment on their mobile devices.

Both VR and AR has a lot of growth in the airline industry. It main usage is largely focus on the added-value towards customer experiences.

Environmental Factors

As Airlines account for 2% of man-made global carbon emission, United Nation has proposed a voluntary scheme that aim to cap the aviation industry’s carbon footprint and Singapore has joined to be part of the scheme (Kaur 2017).

From 2021, all Singapore carriers must neutralise their carbon dioxide emission. Extra cost incurred will be borne by airlines and therefore, raising the overall price of air-travel. This can impact TA and reduce their attractiveness due to price hike.

2.2 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

Threat of New Entrants [LOW]

Increase Power (+)

Decrease Power (-)

· N/A

· High barrier of Entry

· Players are willing and able to contest new entry

· Industry outlook is risky

The strict government regulations in the airline industry and the high capital needed to set up an airline decrease the attractiveness of this market. Within the LCC industry in Asia, there are also many established competitors that have cost advantages and reputable brand image that provide them competitive advantages. The LCC industry is a highly price sensitive market and extremely competitive therefore, actions (price war) will be taken if there’s a new entrant.

Bargaining Power of Suppliers [MODERATE]

Increase Power (+)

Decrease Power (-)

· Few suppliers for aircraft manufacturing in the airline industry

· No substitutes for jet fuel

· High switching costs for aircraft suppliers

· Jet fuel is a commodity

· Substitutes for maintenance, staff and food providers

· Airline companies are the major customers of suppliers (jet fuel and aircraft manufacturing)

Large capital and intellectual property is required for aircraft manufacturing thus it is hard to backward integrate. For large aircrafts, there are only Boeing and Airbus, the two major companies for huge aircraft manufacturing, while larger but limited number of suppliers for small aircraft manufacturing. Therefore, there is high switching costs for aircraft suppliers. Moreover, there is no substitutes for jet fuel but it is a commodity hence it weakens the bargaining power of suppliers. There are also substitutes for maintenance, staff and food providers (such as SATS Food, Gate Gourmet and Flying Food Group). Suppliers also include airports (e.g. Changi Airport) as they provide infrastructure (such as parking and runway), and SATS which provides baggage solution. However, there is no doubt that the airline companies are the major customers of suppliers for aircraft manufacturing and jet fuel as they are for a long-term basis.

Bargaining Power of Customers [HIGH]

Increase Power (+)

Decrease Power (-)

· Mostly Standardized

· Low Cost of Switching

· Buyers are price sensitive

· Well-informed

· Cannot integrate backwards

· Buyers are small

The LCC services are mostly standardized, providing low cost fares and similar routes. Therefore, passenger have more options to choose from. Due to the highly competition and price sensitive market in LCC industry, there is little cost of switching beside the frequent flyer program. With today’s technology, buyers are more well-informed regarding the airline prices and level of services and able to find better deals.

However, the buyers in the market are numerous and lack financial muscle to integrate backwards. Bargaining power of customer is considered high due to the factors above.

Threat of Substitutes [LOW]

Increase Power (+)

Decrease Power (-)

· N/A

· Lack of reliable substitute transport

· High cost in switching

Main factor in determining threat of substitute is the length of the distance. Short haul routes towards nearby cities or island such as Johor Bahru and Batam can normally use substitute such as land or water transport. While longer distance routes such as China and Taiwan, air-travel are best use for access.

Despite having a train routes from Singapore towards countries such as Thailand, Vietnam and China, it requires transit and take more time, therefore translating to a higher cost.

Overall, the price of substitute is rather low compared to air-travel, however, the quality and performance are incomparable, thus the threat level is low.

Competitive Rivalry within an Industry [HIGH]

Increase Power (+)

Decrease Power (-)

· Buyer costs to switch brand are low

· Weakly Differentiated

· Highly perishable goods

· High exit barrier

· Numerous Competitors

· High buyer demand

The weakly differentiated offerings by LCC and the price sensitivity market allows buyers to switch brand based on the price factor. This results in price competition in the market to convince consumers to switch.

Rivalry increased as the services provided by airline is highly perishable coupled by the high fixed cost (aircraft fuel, manpower etc.) This will force price wars to ensure seats are fill to cut down on costs.

Within the LCC industry, there are many competitors (Scoot, TA, AirAsia, JetStar etc.), therefore rivalry will intensify when one try to gain market shares which can result in price war.

High barrier of exit also increase the level of rivalry as industry become overcrowded or firm cutting price to overcome financial trouble. Some example of exit barrier is difficulty in selling off used aircraft, cost associated with termination payment to workers, costs for contract violations and costs of abandoning valuable slots (IATA 2012).

Industry Outlook

The assessment revealed that the strongest threat to profitability comes from rivalry among existing competitors and bargaining power of buyer. Therefore, TA would have to pursue strategies that can shield competitive pressure or decrease the pressure.

Overall analysis suggests that the LCC market is an attractive market for the established players due to the rest of the forces lie between low and moderate pressure.

2.3 Industry Life Cycle

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/OWkmZaRynbPhSEi7kp5ulFRk7AT70AMxzJCSMHC7qzvAHKUG_-ru8JiKhiYvBrfjv0y8tsM99dcVJHSoWX77WlVsQE-CWG3FODb0C5YmQ1suqHCBrVRxj4u4D7DZDSv1sxoXg4bX

The LCC industry in Asia is currently at the shakeout stage. The current industry is growing at a slower rate compared to when the industry was at its introductory stage sixteen years ago, (Meszaros 2016). A shakeout occurred due to high growth and demand with the overexpansion of airlines. However, there are emerging markets in Asia (E.g. China, India and certain Southeast Asian countries). Thus, showing there is a slow but rising growth.

Due to the major players such as JetStar group, AirAsia Group owning a large percentage of the market share in Asia, Value Alliance, is a sign of consolidation in the shakeout period to increase their reach and tackle the larger rivals (Kotoky & Whitley 2016). The alliance was formed to prevent the 8 LCCs from getting eliminated.

2.4 Competition Analysis

Strategic Group Map

Company

Tigerair

Singapore (Singapore Airlines 2016)

AirAsia Group

(2016)

JetStar Asia Airways

(2015)

Lion Air, Thai Lion Air (n.d)

Scoot (Singapore Airlines 2016)

AirAsia X

Group (2016)

JetStar Airways, Pacific,

Japan (2015)

Revenue passenger-km

9,551.1

Million SGD

68,434 Million MYR (Approximately: 22,075 Million SGD)

-

-

8,673.9

Million SGD

29,343 Million MYR

(Approximately: 9,465 Million SGD)

-

Number of Passengers carried

5.128 Million

56.59

Million

-

-

2.412

Million

4,866

Million

-

Fleet Size

23

172

18

138

12

30

105

Destinations

40

Destinations

Over 100

Destinations

22

Destinations

56

Destinations

18 Destinations

23

Destinations

Over 50

Destinations

Market

Short Haul

Short Haul

Short Haul

Short, Medium Haul

Medium, Long Haul

Long Haul

Short, Medium, Long haul

Freight/ Cargo Service

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/XBB1jwFJHJCv67vJJFrkHbkXTUN3CiFVJtgLkrPK-3fG0zVHPpCJmmXHYQsySxs87tl3pVOqG5fDKCFYlBpO5mTgcX88t1xuWTv_irJNT4nVqY1CDoeOVryomY66Vv0yMBZDcJ0P

Figure 2.4: Strategic Group Map

Figure 2.4 compares the quality range (Skytrax 2016) and market it caters by TA and its competitors. From the map, we can identify AirAsia Group, Lion Air, Thai Lion Air and Jetstar Asia being its direct competitor as they cater to passengers traveling short to medium haul flights.

Firstly, compared to its largest competitor, AirAsia Group an aspect which TA is able to improve on would be to increase its number of destinations it travels to. Secondly the airline is ranked third in quality range. This is an opportunity for improvement by providing their staff with better training and improving products offered.

By expanding their coverage, increasing their quality range and including cargo shipping, TA can grow the business and garner more sales.

3. Customer Analysis

3.1 Market Size and Profitability

Asia-Pacific currently holds 32.9% of the world air passenger market in 2017 (IATA 2017). To add on, Asia region is demonstrating healthy growth at a rate of 4.1% per year, higher than the global average (Boeing 2016). Total air traffic in the Asia-Pacific is forecast to grow at an average of 6.2%, and by 2035, Asia will have 48.7% of the global passenger air traffic (Boeing 2016).  South East Asia passenger traffic will also be expected to accelerate at 6.4% over the next 20 years.

With the increasing expansion of the middle class in Asia, it is expected to experience a robust growth rate in the leisure and business travel industry.

In 2015, Asia became the biggest business travel region in the world and is expected to dominate (McKinsey&Company 2015), and by 2025, corporate travel spending in Asia-Pacific will double to $900 billion and will make up half of the world total (Amadeus 2015).

Increase business travel and leisure spending will also make a shift towards emerging markets like China, India, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia and the Philippines.

Low cost carrier is most likely benefit from this trend as LCCs are the popular choices for the individuals traveling in the region (Euromonitor 2016).

Currently, LCC holds a 26% market share in Asia-Pacific and 54% in South East Asia. Therefore, the current market size and future growth in the region is immense and allow many opportunities for LCC to capture and expand its leisure and business segment.

3.2 Market Segmentation

Two important customer segments to the LCC in Asia-Pacific were identified and the factors that influence their purchase decision.

LCC Consumer Segments

Segment 1:

Leisure Travellers

Segment 2:

Business Travellers

· Targeted a broad age group from 19 to 54. Older people aged above 55 most likely prefer full-service airlines (Mintel 2005).

· More price-sensitive due to low income. Value-oriented

· Mostly for short trip holiday

· Sees LCC as a mean for transportation only

· Favourite activities while travelling in Asia Pacific: 1st Wi-Fi, 2nd Meal, 3rd In-Flight Entertainment (Statista 2016).

· Targeting PMET (SME, Corporate)

· Price-sensitive due to market conditions.

· Look for frequency of flight and degree of flexibility in changing booking (Garcia, Rosell & Coenders 2011)

· Prefers Wi-Fi, convenience flight times, direct flights and comfortable seats (Singapore Tourism Board 2015)

· “Time is Money” mindset

· Bleisure: Travel for business and leisure

· India and Indonesia businessman more willing to travel in LCC

In the increasing competitive LCC industry in Asia-Pacific, it is recommended for LCC to put emphasis on the business travel segment due to the higher revenue and the freedom to differentiate services as compared to leisure travellers.

While many LCCs in Asia provide differentiated offerings to the business segment, TA is lacking behind and offering limited services for the business travellers in the regional area such as flexi-combo, tigerplus and American express payment. This can allow other competitors to gain market share in this lucrative segment.

On the other hand, Scoot, TA “sister” company, is offering ScootBiz for this segment during their medium/long haul flights.

4. Company Internal Analysis

4.1 Porter’s Value Chain of Company

A company’s value chain distinguishes the primary activities and support activities that create customer values. It is a tool that helps in evaluating how a company delivers value proposition.

Using value chain, this report will analysis TA’s strengths and weaknesses in creating customer value proposition.

Firm Infrastructure

HR Management

Technology Department

Procurement

Supply-Chain Management

Operations

Distribution

Sales and Marketing

Service

· Fuel Procurement

· Route Selection

· Yield Management Service

· Aircraft Acquisition

(AIRBUS)

· Food and Beverage (SATS)

· Ticket Counters

· Gate Operations

· Aircraft Operation

· In-Flight Service

· Baggage Handling

· Flight Connections

· Car-rental/Hotel reservation.

· Booking channels

· Promotions

· Advertising

· Group Sales

· Customer Service

· Feedback Channels

· Lost/ damage Baggage Services

· Advantage Program

4.1.1 Primary Activities

Inbound Logistic

· TA have a good relationship with Airbus. Both entity have signed long term agreement regarding the purchase of more fuel-efficient aircrafts. Coupled with the current fuel cost, this will help TA to cut down on fuel costs in the long run. Total fleet size of TA is 23.

· Through actively reviewing Asia route networks, non-performing route like Guilin have been suspended by TA and added frequencies towards selective routes and new destinations (Ipoh, Quanzhou, Lucknow) that are more profitable. Currently, the airline flies over 40 destinations across 12 countries in Asia.

Operations

· With Web Check-in and Direct-to-Gate services introduced by TA, customers can be move to their flights quicker, ensuring punctuality and improve flight turnovers.

· TA had signed a contract with Airbus for fleet technical management and inventory technical management for its A320ceo aircraft. The agreement will allow the airline to save US$20million on aircraft maintenance.

· TA SG in-flight services includes tiger bites and a magazine. While TA Australia operates on a ‘bring your own device’ basis and provide tigertainment through the passengers’ own devices. This allows them to remain less costly.

Distribution

· TA uses 3 distribution channels to sell their tickets. The firm utilise direct selling through its website and its mobile app. They also utilised travel agents through Amadeus and lastly, through ticket counters. Their multi-channel strategy allows the firm to expose to more customers and provide value such as convenience, albeit at a higher cost.

· TA also provide car rental, hotel reservation and holiday bundles to give their customers more value, allowing them to have a seamless booking experience. They also provide airport transfer services.

Marketing and Sales

· TA utilised mainly social media (Facebook, Instagram, twitter) for marketing purposes. This will help TA to minimise cost but lower exposure to other segment which don’t use social media.

· Multiple awards received by TA reflects its strong leading position in the industry.

Services

· Through its hotline and website, TA provides special booking, feedback and complain channels for customer. They also provide lost baggage services.

· CSISG (2016) reported that compared with other low cost carrier, the satisfaction score of TA (68.6%) overall services are lower than its competitors, AirAsia (69.9%) and JetStar (70.3%).

· Through SIA, TA has been incorporated into the Kris Flyer programme. This allow members to gain and redeem miles when traveling. Through the prestige of the programme, TA can differentiate from its competitors.

· Only LCC that offers extensive boarding pass privileges such as exclusive deals with local merchants (Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan). Such added value service allows TA to offer consumers more value and cost saving.

4.1.2 Supporting Activities

Firm Infrastructure

· The firm quality management of the aircraft is considered a weakness. In January 2017, a burning smell caused by a faulty fan in the ventilation system caused the flight to divert to Ho Chi Minh City. While in 2016, a fault in the braking system caused the passengers to switch aircraft, subsequently, the substitute plane was also experiencing engine problems. The incident caused a 5 hours’ delay. This will incur cost to the airline operation.

· Currently, SIA control over 90 per cent of issued share capital of TA. The organisation structure also included several veteran SIA executives to assist in planning, sales and marketing. Majority of SIA nominees had taken up most of the directorships on TA’ Board. Combined with the wealth of experience and resources SIA brought in, TA began to recover.

HR Management

· TA had encountered many issues arise from bad HR management. In 2010, TA Singapore cancelled several flights due to resignation of pilots due to remuneration problems. The airline’s Australia franchise was also suspended due to pilot proficiency.

· In the 2015 annual report, TA acknowledged the high turnover rate due to the uncertainty future of the firm and aim to attract, retain talents and manage attrition through salaries review, provide job mobility, career development opportunities and strengthen employee engagement. A bad HR management will incur higher cost in the long run.

Technology Department

· With product innovation like Tigerholidays, TA provide a seamless whole package travel experience for passengers on the internet. The airline will also focus on mobile engagement (TA App) and data analytics to communicate and understand passengers better.

· Both TA and Scoot utilized the same computer reservations system, with the integration into the SIA family, the two airlines had integrated their system to allow convenience when booking either airlines.

Procurement

· Tiger Airway Singapore entered an agreement with Airbus and Pratt & Whitney for the order of 37 fuel-efficient Airbus A320neo aircraft with Pratt & Whiney PW1100G-JM engines. The new aircrafts coupled with the new engine will deliver 15% greater fuel efficiency which translate to S$40 million in savings annually.

· Tiger Airway Singapore has also signed a decade long contract with Airbus for fleet technical management and inventory technical management for its A320ceo aircraft. It will cover the planning and management of aircraft maintenance. This agreement will help Tiger Airway to save up to US$20million.

4.2 Collaborators

Value Alliance (Strategic Alliance)

(TA Scoot, Cebu Pacific, Jeju Air, Vanilla Air, Nok Air, NokScoot & TA Australia)

Opportunity to Enhance Value & Market Access

· Over 160 destinations across Asia

· Allow consumers to book tickets and addition services in a single itinerary.

· Increase accessibility and convenience.

· Alliance allows member to reach beyond their own home market and reduce costs on distribution channel through leveraging partners existing means.

· Allow the alliance to challenge bigger players (JetStar and AirAsia).

Airbus (Strategic Supplier)

Competitive Strategy

· By outsourcing maintenance services on its aircraft, TA can save on labour and equipment costs.

SIA & Scoot (Internal Partnership)

Opportunity to Enhance Value + Skill and Resource Gap

· Kris Flyer programme from SIA allows TA to enhance value towards consumers and differentiate from competitors.

· Integration between Scoot and TA will benefit both and fulfil any skill and resources gaps, improving their operational and commercial synergies.

· With SIA as the parent company, TA will benefit from its experience, capabilities, resources and brand image.

SATS (Strategic Supplier)

Competitive Strategy

· TA need to keep its cost low to have a competitive advantage in the LCC industry. Collaborating with SATS on outsourcing food and ground services, it allows the firm to maintain its low cost.

NTUC (Strategic Partnership)

Opportunity to Enhance Value

· Partnership with NTUC by offering travel benefits (Boardmefirst, $5 off upsize luggage) to NTUC members.

· Benefit both entities as TA will gain potential customers while NTUC add value to their members.

Cebu Pacific (Strategic Alliance)

Opportunity to Enhance Value + Resources Gap

· Allow TA and Cebu Pacific to expand their network by leverage each established network in South East Asia, India, Philippines and North Asia.

· Provide greater connectivity to travellers and value.

4.3 VRIN Framework

Valuable

Rare

Inimitable

Non-substitutable

Customer Service

No

No

Yes

No

Destination

Yes

No

Yes

No

Food Variety

Yes

No

Yes

No

Food Quality

Yes

No

Yes

No

Seat Comfort (leg space)

No

No

Yes

No

Flight Punctuality

Yes

No

Yes

No

Additional Services

Yes

No

Yes

No

Special Needs

(allow guide dogs on-flight)

Yes

No

Yes

No

Based on the VRIN framework above, TA has no competitive advantage as it lacks differentiation in the airline industry.

5. SWOT Analysis

5.1 SWOT

After evaluating both internal and external factors of TA and the low-cost carrier industry, the below SWOT table was created to further analysis and craft future strategic actions.

Internal Strength

Integration with Scoot

Integration between the 2 airlines allow economic of scale and the expansion of routes, therefore opening more opportunities.

Experienced Management

The management team are experienced and capable ex SIA veterans. Their experience will benefit TA and allow improvement in their management.

Strategic Partnership

The value alliance allows TA to open out its network and able to resist strong competition in the industry.

Strategic alliance with Cebu Pacific allow TA to expand its network even bigger and providing more value to customers.

Partnering with Kris Flyer, a prestige loyalty program by SIA allows TA to better differentiate from its competitors.

SIA

With SIA as the parent company, TA can leverage on its resources and brand image.  

Boarding Pass Privilege

TA is the only airline with an extensive boarding pass privilege that offers better deal from local merchant. This can attract consumers who are more price conscious.

Strong Market Position and Brand Identity

TA has a strong position in the LCC industry and have won several awards in the past year. The awards are a testament of TA leading position which can be used for promotion means to attract customer.

Internal Weakness

Customer Service

TA compared to its competitors (JetStar, Air Asia) score lower satisfaction score according to CSISG (2016). As airline is a service operation, it is essential to deliver satisfaction to customer beside having low price.

Lack of Management Depth

There is a management problem as there have been issues on quality management and HR management. Such problems will incur higher cost for TA.

Lack of Differentiation

TA and its competitors are offering standardised services. There is no clear differentiation between them which increases the rivalry and bargaining power of buyer. Compared to other airlines, TA also provide lesser offerings to business traveller segment.

Asia Network

TA focus on only short haul flights in Asia. Therefore, the limited operations make it vulnerable to the political and economic risk in this area.

In-flight Entertainment

Compared to the other LCC. TA do not provide any in-flight entertainment add-on beside a magazine. TA also do not provide Wi-Fi which is an important factor for both leisure and business segment.

External Opportunities

Increase in Global Demand / Tourism Industry Bloom

Positive outlook in global airline traffic as Asia-Pacific will see an extra 1.8 billion annual passengers by 2035.

China and India will be the growth engine of LCC market.

This will increase demand for air travel.

New Technology

VR and AR

Economic Downturn

TA can benefit as consumers will be more price conscious.

Business Traveller

Business Traveller market in Asia will become the biggest market globally. Provide higher revenue than leisure traveller. Especially in China and India.

ASEAN Open Skies

Allow LCCs to fly freely within SEA. Past restrictions are lifted, clearing path for expansion and more routes.

Cargo Services

TA don’t offer cargo services currently, therefore, it is an opportunity to expand into cargo.

External Threat

UN Scheme

TA will be affected by the UN Scheme as cost incurred will pass on to consumers.

Intense Competition

· Many competitors

· Low switching cost

· Lack of differentiation

Increase of Buyer Power

Due to the standardized offerings, price sensitive market, variety of competitors and ease of collecting information, consumers can select which LCC to patronise, therefore, TA need to minimise pressure from buyer.

Fuel Cost Rising

It is expected for fuel cost to rise in the upcoming years, which will impact TA overall expenses.

5.2 TOWS

TOWS Analysis

Internal Strength

1. Integration with Scoot

2. SIA veteran management

3. Strong Market Position and Identity

4. Strategic Partnership

5. SIA

6. Boarding Pass Privilege

Internal Weakness

1. Inflight Entertainment

2. Customer Service

3. Lack of Management Depth

4. Only focus on Asia network

5. Lack of Differentiation

External Opportunities

1. Increase in Global Demand/Tourism

2. New Technology

3. Economic Downturn

4. Business Travellers

5. ASEAN Open Skies

6. Cargo Services

Strategies that use strengths to maximize opportunities

· Merging with Scoot to increase capacity, network and operation synergies to capture the growing market (China and India)

· Increase the benefits of pass privileges in more countries.

· Leveraging on SIA and Scoot expertise and experience on business travellers to create better regional route offering.

· Increase routes in SEA and access more airports.

· TA can partner with SIA cargo to provide cargo services in the region.

Strategies that minimize weaknesses by taking advantage of opportunities.

· Targeting the business traveller segment with better offerings to compensate for lack of differentiation.

· Research on routes that will increase in demand and focus on it.

· Using technology to serve as front line operation to increase efficiency.

· Developing AR in mobile app for a variety of functions (way-finding, information)

· Expand to Asia-Pacific through Scoot and Alliances.

External Threats

1. UN Scheme

2. Intense Competitions

3. Buyer Power

4. Fuel Cost

Strategies that use strengths to minimize threats

· Following its parent company, TA can hedge fuel while the cost is low.

· Leveraging on SIA and Scoot reputation and expertise, TA can differentiate itself.

Strategies that minimize weaknesses and avoid threats

· Differentiate the offerings (Ultra low cost (Spirit) vs Differentiated (Southwest)Model)

· Merging with Scoot

· Finding partnership in big and emerging market such as India and China.

6. Corporate Strategy Analysis

6.1 SIA Mission and Values

Corporate Mission Statement

Singapore Airlines (SIA) is a global company dedicated to providing air transportation services of the highest quality and to maximising returns for the benefit of its shareholders and employees (SIA 2016).

Corporate Value

SIA have 6 values that are essential in their conduct of business. They are pursuit of excellence, safety, customer first, concern for staff, integrity and teamwork.

Pursuit of Excellence

· Highest professional standards

Safety

· Highest standard in Safety

Customer First

· Going extra mile to exceed their expectations

Concern for Staff

· Provide training and development

· Care for well-being

Integrity

· Strive for fairness

Teamwork

· Working together with pride

6.2 Current SIA Strategies

Current strategies deployed by SIA is strongly guided by its mission and the market environment.

Portfolio Strategy

(SIA, Silk Air, Scoot & TA)

Portfolio of both full-service and low-cost airline provides short, medium and long-haul. A comprehensive coverage on the air travel segment, allowing market extension.

Multi-Hub

(Vistara &NokScoot)

Expansion via joint venture into India and Thailand to create new growth in key markets.

Strengthening Premium Positioning

Strengthening through service excellence, product leadership and network connectivity. This can enhance differentiation.

New Business Ventures

Airbus Asia Training Centre, joint venture between SIA and Airbus

SIA key strategic objectives for the LCC industry is to move into new market such as India and strengthening existing route such as China. Both of which are huge and attractive market (Euromonitor 2017).

Current global brand strategy for Budget Aviation Holdings is to become the low-cost carrier of choice for regional and international budget travellers.

6.3 Latest Acquisition

With LCCs comprising more than 50% of the market share in Southeast Asia, it is crucial to acquire TA to strengthen SIA position in the competitive low-cost carrier industry and as part of their multi-pronged strategy (SIA 2016).

6.4 Line of Business

SIA limited offers a wide variety of services that focus on air transportation. To achieve their mission, the following offerings are provided.

Main Offering

Singapore Airlines

Providing full service airline + Long haul

Subsidiaries

Horizontal Integration

Silk Air

Providing full service airline + Regional

Budget Aviation Holdings (TA & Scoot)

Providing low cost + Long haul+ Regional

SIA Cargo

Cargo delivery

Backward Integration

SIA Engineering

Maintenance, repair services etc.

6.4.1 Horizontal Integration

To generate more income for SIA (2016) Singapore Airlines Cargo was introduced to deliver a range of shipments which consists of animals, rare artworks and race cars. Under Singapore Airlines Cargo management, all the airlines except TA provides cargo services.

The integration of both Silk air and the budget airlines allow SIA Ltd to gain access towards different segment that SIA cannot reach. This allows SIA to cover all segment within the market.

With the integration between Scoot and TA under Budget Aviation Holdings, this can provide economic of scales, operation synergies and achieve higher load factor. Both LCCs will be able to challenge competitive against the competitors.

6.4.2 Backward Integration

SIA engineering currently caters to more than 80 airlines worldwide at 35 airports in seven countries (SIA 2016). This component in the group pursues backward integration to allows control of more of its supply chain, improves efficiency and cost savings on maintenance and repair services.

6.4.3 Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/KtN4FVySZ_GkxTAjjLMZVdFKrUpbRBOBFYoKAGChW3JTegNPCELU7sihcUymidJKyNw2VUIR-x5_vK_uRPNXNH24gE09qHSjCocG9yHbEkwn1G8ahntuRU1NNhiCtwevK7DK2MmK

Using the BCG matrix, TA is identified as a “Question Mark”. It is operating with a low market share in a high-growth market as its fleet size is smaller than its competitors (AirAsia and JetStar). Furthermore, TA is offering fewer destinations and products than AirAsia and JetStar. Therefore, it has a potential to become a “Star” eventually by increasing its market share when expanding its leisure and business segment.

6.5 Corporate Strategy

Related Diversification

· Current corporate strategy employed by SIA is related diversification.  This can be inferred from their current strategies and past acquisition.

· Related diversification is when a business expands its activities into product lines that are like those it currently offers.

· In this case, SIA diversify using its subsidiaries into different air transportation market.

· Underlying reasons for SIA to diversify are to capture lucrative market (Joint venture), expand its offerings to appeal to different market (Full-service & Low-Cost) and to reduce competitive pressure in the full-service airline industry (risk spreading).

· By employing related diversification, SIA enjoys increase profits, resources sharing, economic of scales between its subsidiaries and create synergy effect (TA & Scoot).

· SIA can also expand its network further into China and India through its diversification as these 2 have the biggest growth.

7. Business Strategy Analysis

7.1 Tiger air’s Current Business Strategy

In the highly competitive low cost carrier industry, TA along with 7 other low cost carriers in the Asia-Pacific formed the Value Alliance (StraitsTimes 2016). The alliance is a strategic move to grow and defend market shares from the growing Asia market against heavyweight AirAsia with 15% of the Asian budget market and JetStar with 9% (StraitsTimes 2016). With the Value Alliance, TA can lower costs and provide seamless booking experience for the customers.

Scoot and TA are also position to capture bigger share of the low-cost travel market through the expansion of cockpit and cabin crews. It is expected that the pilot numbers will increase from 400 to 700 by 2020 while cabin crews will grow to 2000 during the same period (StraitsTimes 2016). The number of fleets by Scoot and TA will also increase to 20 and 38 planes respectfully soon. Due to the high growth of the market, quick expansion is required to handle demand and capture market share.

As China and India are the main engine of the growth, TA also expanded its route map into more areas in these emerging countries to tap on their potential profits (Elliott 2015).

Therefore, from the above actions, it is concluded that TA current business strategy is Low-Cost Analyser as they try to strengthen and defend their competitive position in their home market via alliance and pursuing expansion and growth in China and India while providing low cost to the passengers.

7.2 Functional Strategies

We have chosen two relevant strategies to support Tiger Airways’ business strategy in the following table.

Human Resource Management Strategy

Currently, Tiger Airways is focusing on a low-cost strategy. Customers of Tiger Airways tend to have lower expectations for the quality of service from cabin crew as they are paying for low fare tickets (Wittman 2014). Hence, the recruiting requirements for cabin crew are not strict (Tigerair 2017).

However, cabin crew should still possess with good communications skill and have passion for customer service such as attending to customer’s needs on-flight. They can also join the company with or without experience.

Marketing Strategy

Tiger Airways aims to gain its market share in the low-cost airline industry. By adopting its current business strategy - low-cost, it tries to stimulate demand by offering cheap travel deals to the customers through the formation of Value Alliance and the integration of Scoot. This, in return, is to aid in achieving their objective.

Furthermore, it is currently using the pull strategy to create brand awareness as it advertises their products and services through its website, mobile application and social media (such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram). It also partners with Indonesia’s Ministry of Tourism to allow customers to have discounts using promotional codes when booking flights to Jakarta and Surabaya (Tigerair 2017).  

7.3 Evaluation of Current Business Strategy

Considering the current shakeout lifecycle, Analyser strategy is best employed in the LCC industry as despite the overcapacity and shakeout, there is still high growth and undeveloped segments in the Asia Pacific region.

Current strategy employed by TA complement SIA’s corporate strategy. SIA key strategic objectives include diversify into new market such as India and strengthening existing market such as China. (Euromonitor 2017). Therefore, with TA expansion into these markets, it enhances SIA overall offerings in the low-cost market and aligned with the corporate strategy.

Given the SWOT analysis, it is appropriate for TA to employ Analyser strategy. With SIA’s resource support and integration with Scoot, TA can defend and expand its market. Especially in the LCC market with many competitors and a few heavyweights, TA must defend and maintain a secure position. Opportunities such as the China, India market and business segment can also provide promising potential for TA. Therefore, by employing Analyser strategy, TA can leverage on opportunity while minimise threat and gain profits.

7.4 New Business Strategy

Despite the fruitfulness of TA current strategy, the analysis revealed that there is an alternative strategy that TA can undertake.

In the low-cost carrier market in Asia, the budget airlines are doing little to differentiate their offerings and are focusing to attract customer with low prices, sacrificing customer services. Therefore, to offer differentiation in the low-cost industry, TA will be employing Differentiated Analyser strategy while also emphasis on maintaining and improving their overall cost. In line with SIA strategy, it is also important for TA to consider high service quality as part of their differentiation.

Contrary to “stuck-in-the-middle” strategy, the hybrid strategy is shown to be viable and profitable (Kim et al 2004; Miller & Dess 1993; Wright et al 1991). Such strategy will also generate multiple sources of sustainable competitive advantage such as higher brand preference, customer loyalty and economies of scale (Acquaah & Ardekani 2006). For TA to pursue such strategy, will help minimising their reliance on cost advantage in a competitive environment, strengthen competitive position and improve differentiation.

The team had also considered to enhance TA low-cost analyser strategy by modelling after Spirit airline ultra-low cost model to become more price competitive than other LCCs or to focus on lower operating cost than other players.

Spirit airline model target the most price-sensitive consumers. Their fare inclusive of only 1 seat and a carry-on bag, any ancillary services will be charged. Even the printing of boarding ticket will be charged US$10 (Spirit 2017). Their model and their operating efficiency allow them to have the lowest cost in their market and high revenue, however, at the expense of customer satisfaction (CNN 2016).

Considering the corporate strategy of SIA, where high quality service is a part of their culture, TA will not be employing this model as it will reflect badly on the overall brand image and reputation. It will also be difficult and unsustainable for TA to focus on cost leadership strategy as it can be easily replicate by competitors and it is extremely difficult for airline to backward integration. Thus, differentiation analyser strategy was chosen.

7.5 Implications of New Business Strategy

To sustain the analyser strategy, TA need to consider various factors such as resource and synergy. As analyser do both expanding and defending, a high resource will be required to sustain them. In addition, operation synergy should be achieved for defending policy and in maintaining the low cost.

Looking at Southwest Airline model for guidance, TA’s strategy requirements will be having to adjust the company culture, improving level of customer services and recruitment policies. TA need to create a customer-centric culture. Human resource policies such as recruitment requirements and employee benefits must also be revised to find suitable talents that can enhance services and reflect the company culture. Policy flexibility also needed to ensure customer convenience and confident. Extra services such as Wi-fi and in-flight entertainment can be added to improve experience.

Implications for the new strategy will be higher cost relative to competitors in the short term due to establishing new policies, improving offers and increased marketing promotion to reflect the new position. Cannibalization will also occur if TA implement budget business class services.

However, the benefits will be substantial due to differentiate in a standardised market will grow loyalty and market share. Keeping in mind that TA don’t fall into the “stuck-in-the-middle”, the hybrid strategy can be done sequentially to build differentiation first.

In the long run, it can provide TA with sustainable competitive advantage. The issue on cannibalization will also impact SIA. But due to AirAsia and JetStar are taking market shares away from SIA (Euromonitor 2017), it will be appropriate for TA to enter the segment and prevent it.

To reduce the short term adverse effect of the higher cost incurred, TA can reduce profit margin in the short-run or leverage resources from SIA or Scoot.

8. Recommendations

TA is a challenger in the low-cost carrier market in the region, therefore share-growth strategies are employed to steal shares from the share leaders. 2 strategies will be employed to make TA more attractive to both the leisure and business segments and move from “Question mark” to “Star”.

8.1 Recommended Strategies

With the new differentiated analyser strategy, TA will be providing better services compared to its competitors, therefore a frontal attack will be most suitable.

Strategic Option 1: Frontal Attack

Opportunity Identified

· Lack of differentiation hence no brand loyalty

· SIA customer service reputation

· SIA resources (promotion strength)

· Basic customer service across competitors

· Competitors have lower operating cost than TA

· Integration with Scoot enhance TA overall resources and capabilities

Advantages

· Illustrate differentiation and better services over competitors

· Best competitive strategy in the current market condition

· Can win over higher value customers and grow shares

Disadvantages

· Lengthy retaliation from Competitors with low prices or similar model – High cost

Financial Implication

· High due to long sustain marketing activities to show customer the new differences and position

There is opportunity in the business traveller segment. Therefore, it is recommended for TA to create a budget business class to cater to their needs. As a late entrant to this segment, TA will start their business class services in India first and will utilize guerrilla attack to gain shares from AirAsia and other competitors.

Strategic Option 2: Guerrilla Attack

Opportunity Identified

· Growing business traveller segment in Asia

· Higher profit margin from Business segment

· Untapped market for TA

· India, growing market + India businesses willing to take LCC

· Experienced in business traveller market (SIA, Silkair, Scoot)

· Aligned with SIA corporate strategy

· Competitors have established business segment and is satisfying them

Advantages

· Attract a share of customers from existing segment served by competitors

· Prevent retaliation thus saving resources

Disadvantages

· Not a prolong solution

· Must lower prices which will incur higher cost in the short-run

· Cannot take too many shares if not will be caught

Financial Implication

· Moderate to High

· Lower profits and higher marketing cost due to sales promotion and local marketing activities

8.2 Implementation of Recommendations

8.2.1 Marketing Plan

The first implementation plan will be for frontal attack strategy.

Situation Assessment

Current market offers basic level of customer services which provide little differentiation and lack of customer loyalty. Therefore, there is opportunity for TA to take advantage of by providing high level of customer services and unique culture to garner loyalty. Through differentiation analyser strategy, TA will be able to gain competitive advantage and defend its share.

Target Market

Leisure travellers – Price Conscious but willing to pay slightly higher prices for better services

Marketing Objectives

· Build brand awareness (differentiation)

· Increase sales

· Grow market shares

· Enhance customer relationship and loyalty

Targeting and Positioning Strategies

· Position TA as the carrier that provide high customer services at low cost.

Incorporating Marketing Mix Components

Product:

· Improve TA product through increase level of service quality.

· Service quality improvements through recruitment of employees with TA’s personality, better work incentives that reward based on customer services and having customer centric policies (flexible cancellation)

· Building a strong and unique brand personality.

Price:

· Low Cost Pricing + Competitive Pricing

· Price maintain low in the short run to allow customers to experience the new services and build perception.

· Long run – Apply competitive pricing and price slightly higher than competitors to reflect quality.

Place:

Internet based selling

Promotion: High Level of Promotion

· Main promotion message is to show the difference in the level of services provided between competitors and how TA differentiate from other LCC.

· Long marketing campaign to change target audience perception.

· Using both traditional (Newspaper, TV and Radio) and new (Social Media) advertisement to spread the message.

· Having special discount to gain short-term sales to let customers experience and build WOM.

· Increase the interactivity between customer and TA

The second implementation plan will be for the guerrilla attack strategy.

Situation Assessment

Currently, TA do not offer any business class offering.

Research shows that business travellers are willing to pay more and provide a higher profit margin than leisure travellers. The business travellers market is also the highest globally therefore, it is a profitable market.

Asian businesses travellers are becoming more cost conscious and prefer to fly on airlines which offer bundle deals (E.g. inflight meal(s), priority check ins). They also have a different set of preferences. However, out of all the Asian business travellers, Indian business travellers are one of the most willing to fly with LCCs (McKinsey&Company 2015). However, a criterion is the airline having to offer digital services such as inflight Wi-Fi (McKinsey&Company 2015).

The integration of the new offering will provide TA with higher revenue.

Target Market

Price conscious business clients in India

Marketing Objectives

· To gain shares in the business segment by “stealing” from major competitors

· To increase brand awareness

· To cultivate loyalty

· Establish in the India Market

Targeting and Positioning Strategies

· Position as a low-cost business class with high customer service than competitors

Incorporating Marketing Mix Components

Product:

· New business class offerings with additional services such as Wi-Fi, comfortable seat, leg space, in-flight entertainment, direct boarding and flexible booking changes. Provide Kris Flyer program and lounge services (Singapore).

Price:

· Low Cost and Competitive Pricing

Place:

· Through online selling

· GDS

Promotion: Low-Moderate Localised Marketing

· Sales promotion to attract new buyers, allowing them to try the new service and induce WOM

· Localised marketing effort in India to induce brand awareness and growth of shares

· Comparative promotion to show differentiation in offerings

9. Conclusion

The report revealed that there is a gap in the LCC industry. With the lack of differentiation among the players, price is the biggest factor in deciding market shares. With large competitors, such as Airasia and JetStar, whom possesses larger assets, more routes, market shares and lower operating costs, Tigerair must pursue a different strategy to gain competitive advantage and remain in the race. Currently, Tigerair is pursuing the low-cost analyser, despite the current success of the strategy, Tigerair must revise its strategy and pursue differentiated analyser strategy to become sustainable.

The analysis also shows that Asia is growing rapidly especially in China and India, and by 2035, it will have 48.7% of the global passenger air traffic. Asia is also the biggest business travel region and Tigerair currently do not offer specialized offering towards this segment while its competitors have already established themselves and robbing some of SIA market shares.

Therefore, it is suggested that Tigerair will differentiate itself by offering better customer services and relatable brand personality than its competitors while offering low cost. This will increase brand preference, increase sales and market shares. The differentiation also allows Tigerair to build sustainable competitive advantage.

Tigerair should also introduce business class offering. The India market despite being competitive, is an attractive market and more likely to take LCC. Thus, Tigerair will begin their business class offerings in the India market. Once the service has established itself, Tigerair will expand the offerings to other market.

Based on the research and analysis, Tigerair has little resources and competency of its own that can provide sustainable competitive advantage. Most of its strength and successes derived from the integration with Scoot and the recent acquisition by SIA.

Hence, for Tigerair to succeed, it is best advised that Tigerair officially merge with Scoot and form under Scoot branding. The consolidation of both budget airlines will benefit SIA while also bringing the new entity economies of scale, synergy, preventing brand confusion and achieve a more competitive position. The new entity then can implement the recommended strategies to create sustainable competitive advantages and penetration into a highly potential segment and strive to become an important player in the market.

10. References

Airasia X 2016, Fourth Quarter and Full year 2016 Financial Results, Airasia X, viewed 15 March 2017, < http://airasiax.listedcompany.com/misc/qr/presentation_slide_4Q2016.pdf >.

Airasia X 2016, Airasia x records first full year net profit since ipo of rm 230.5mil, Airasia X, viewed 15 March 2017, < http://airasiax.listedcompany.com/newsroom/PressReleases_4Q2016.pdf >.

ABC News 2017, Tigerair dumps flights from Australia to Bali, blames Indonesia, ABC News, viewed 28 March 2017, <http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-03/tigerair-dumps-australia-to-bali-flights-permanently/8239064>.

Acquaah, M 2006, ‘Does the implementation of a combination competitive strategy yield incremental performance benefit? A new perspective from transition economy in Sub-Saharan Africa’, Journal of Business Research, vol. 61, pp. 346-354, viewed 22 March 2017, < http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.021 >.

Airasia 2016, Airasia berhad fourth quarter 2016 results power of one Airasia durable competition, Airasia berhad, viewed 14 March 2017, <http://www.airasia.com/cdn/docs/common-docs/investor-relations/airasia-berhad-4q16-earnings.pdf>.

Airasia 2016, Preliminary Operating Statistics For the 4th Quarter 2016, Airasia berhad, viewed 14 March 2017, < http://www.airasia.com/cdn/docs/common-docs/investor-relations/airasia-preliminary-operating-statistics4q16.pdf >.

Amadeus 2015, Business Travel in Asia Pacific: Setting the Smart Course, Glycobiology, Amadeus, viewed 20 March 2017, <http://amadeusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Business-Travel-in-Asia-Pacific-Amadeus-Handbook.pdf>.

Bachman, J 2017, Higher Fuel and Labor Costs Mean You’ll Pay More to Fly in 2017, Bloomberg, viewed 25 February 2017, < https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-05/higher-fuel-and-labor-costs-mean-you-ll-pay-more-to-fly-in-2017 >.

BBC News 2017, How can we make business travel less stressful?, BBC News, viewed 9 March 2017, <http://www.bbc.com/news/business-39139958>.

Boeing 2016, Current Market Outlook, Boeing, viewed 20 March 2017, < http://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/commercial/about-our-market/assets/downloads/cmo_print_2016_final.pdf>.

Briefing, A 2017, Malaysia Airport Tax Hikes Scheduled for 2017, ASEAN Business News, ASEAN Business News, viewed 3 March 2017 < http://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/2016/09/26/malaysia-airport-tax-hikes-scheduled-january-2017.html >.

Chia, YM 2017, Economists see a slow 2017, with some bright spots, The Straits Times, viewed 11 March 2017, <http://www.straitstimes.com/business/economy/economists-see-a-slow-2017-with-some-bright-spots>.

Chia, YM 2016, What higher interest rates mean for Singapore, The Straits Times, viewed 11 March 2017, <http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/what-higher-interest-rates-mean-for-singapore>.

Choo, C, Koh, S 2016, Tiger Airways: Navigating Through Challenges and Competition, Nanyang Business School- Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

CNBC 2017, Travel without leaving your seat: Qantas goes VR, viewed 8 March 2017, <http://www.cnbc.com/2015/02/12/airline-gets-virtual-with-its-travel-qantas-to-offer-vr.html>.

CNN 2016, ‘Spirit Airlines scores dead last in customer satisfaction’, CNN, 26 April, viewed 19 March 2017, < http://money.cnn.com/2016/04/26/pf/best-and-worst-airlines-customer-satisfaction/ >.

CSISG 2016, Q2 Scores Air Transport, Land Transport, Logistics, Private Education, and Public Education: Results Overview, CSISG, viewed 28 March 2017, < https://ises.smu.edu.sg/sites/default/files/ises/CSISG2016_Q2_ResultsOverview.pdf >.

Emirates 2017, Processing Request, viewed 9 March 2017, < https://www.emirates.com/media-centre/emirates-introduces-the-worlds-first-interactive-amenity-kit-in-economy-class >.

Euromonitor 2017, Singapore Airlines (SIA) in Travel (World), Euromonitor, viewed 15 March 2017, Passport Database.

Euromonitor International 2016, Airlines in Indonesia, viewed 28 March 2017, Passport database.

Giridharadas, A 2016, Singapore to reap benefits of ASEAN Open Skies agreement: Analysts, Channel News Asia, viewed 11 March 2017, <http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/singapore-to-reap/2530570.html>.

IATA 2016, ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY, IATA, viewed 25 February 2017, < https://www.iata.org/whatwedo/Documents/economics/IATA-Economic-Performance-of-the-Industry-end-year-2016-report.pdf >.

IATA 2017, Air Passenger Market Analysis, IATA, viewed 24 March 2017, <http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/Documents/economics/passenger-analysis-jan-2017.pdf>.

Ironside, R 2017, Tigerair pulls out of Bali flights permanently after Indonesian government fails to approve flights, News, viewed 28 March 2017, < http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/incidents/tigerair-bali-flights-stalled-again/news-story/8a67cf60a24ceafc3a1faf26b92a428e >.

Jetstar 2015, Jetstar Group, Jetstar, viewed 16 March 2017, <http://www.jetstar.com/au/en/about-us/jetstar-group>.

Kaur, K 2017, Singapore to toughen laws against unruly air travellers, The Straits Times, viewed 10 March 2017, < http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/spore-to-toughen-laws-against-unruly-air-travellers >.

Kuar, K 2017, Singapore joins effort to offset airline emissions, The Straits Times,  viewed 11 March 2017 < http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/spore-joins-effort-to-offset-airline-emissions >.

Kaur, K 2017, Scoot, Tigerair to hire more aircrew, The Straits Times, viewed 15 March 2017 <http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/scoot-tigerair-to-hire-more-aircrew>.

Kaur, K 2016, Tigerair adapts to the Scoot way of doing things, Straits Times, viewed 21 March 2017, <http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/tigerair-adapts-to-the-scoot-way-of-doing-things>.

Kim, E., Nam, D., & Stimpert, J 2004,’ Testing the applicability of porter's generic strategies in the digital age: a study of Korean cyber malls’, Journal of Business Strategies, vol. 21, pp. 19-45.

Kotoky, A, Whitley, A, 2016, Headed for Mergers? Carriers Form World's Biggest Alliance of Low-Cost Airlines, Bloomberg, viewed 15 March 2017, < https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-16/cheap-and-available-asian-low-cost-carriers-head-for-the-altar >.

Koh, S, & Choo, C 2016, Tiger Airways: Navigating through Challenges and Competition, The Asian Business Case Centre, viewed [not done]

LAM, L 2017, Burning smell on diverted Tigerair flight from faulty fan; passengers back in Singapore, The Straits Times, viewed 11 March 2017, < http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/burning-smell-on-diverted-tigerair-flight-from-faulty-fan-passengers-back-in-singapore >.

Lim, S 2016, The vacation bug: Why do S’poreans feel the constant need to travel?, TODAY, viewed 12 March 2017, <http://www.todayonline.com/lifestyle/travel/vacation-bug-why-do-sporeans-feel-constant-need-travel?page=1>.

Lion Air n.d, About Us, Lion Air, viewed 15 March 2017, <http://www.lionair.co.id/lion-experience/about-us>.

Martínez-Garcia, E., Ferrer-Rosell, B., & Coenders, G 2012, ‘Profile of business and leisure travelers on low cost carriers in Europe’ Journal of Air Transport Management, vol. 20, pp.12-14 < https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230745109_Profile_of_business_and_leisure_travelers_on_low_cost_carriers_in_Europe >.

MarketLine 2016, Tiger Airways Holdings Limited, MarketLine Companies, viewed 28 March 2017, <http://advantage.marketline.com.ezproxy.lib.rmit.edu.au/Product?ptype=Companies&pid=9700B4DD-9594-49D0-9B10-C4A7EB609A57>

Mckinsey&Company 2015, Asian Business Travellers: 5 Things You Need To Know, McKinsey&Company, viewed 10 March 2017 < http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/travel%20transport%20and%20logistics/our%20insights/cracking%20the%20worlds%20biggest%20business%20travel%20market/asian-business-travellers-five-things-you-need-to-know.ashx >

Michel, S 2015, ‘Let Your Customers Segment Themselves by What They’re Willing to Pay’, Harvard Business Review, 11 March, viewed 21 March 2017, < https://hbr.org/2015/03/let-your-customers-segment-themselves-by-what-theyre-willing-to-pay >.

Miller, A., & Dess, G. 1993,’ Assessing Porter's (1980) model in terms of its generalizability, accuracy and simplicity’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 36, no.4, pp. 763-788.

Meszaros, J 2016, The rise and rise of the region’s low-cost airlines, SouthEast Asia Globe, viewed 13 March 2017, <http://sea-globe.com/low-cost-airlines-southeast-asia/>.

NG, C 2017, Tigerair changes aircraft twice for flight, causing 5-hour delay for 150 passengers at Changi Airport, The Straits Times, viewed 11 March 2017, < http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/transport/tigerair-flight-changes-aircraft-twice-causing-5-hour-delay-for-150-passengers >.

Ramchandani, N 2016, Tiger Air to be delisted from SGX on May 11, The Business Times, viewed 28 March 2017, <http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/tiger-air-to-be-delisted-from-sgx-on-may-11>.

Singapore Airlines 2016, Annual Report FY 2015/2016, Singapore Airlines, viewed 12 March 2017, <https://www.singaporeair.com/saar5/pdf/Investor-Relations/Annual-Report/annualreport1516.pdf>.

Spirit 2017, Spirit 101, Spirit USA, viewed 23 March 2017, < http://marketing.spirit.com/how-to-fly-spirit-airlines/en/ >.

Statista n.d., Premium Favorite activities of air passengers while traveling in Asia Pacific between 2015 and 2016, viewed 21 March 2017, <https://www.statista.com/statistics/655918/air-travel-asia-pacific-preferred-in-flight-services/>

Skytrax 2016, The World’s Best Low-Cost Airlines| 2016, Skytrax, viewed 15 March 2017, <http://www.worldairlineawards.com/Awards/worlds_best_lowcost_airlines.html>.

Tang, SK 2016, Integration of Scoot, Tigerair to strengthen SIA’s position: CEO, Channel NewsAsia, viewed 22 March 2017, < http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/integration-of-scoot-tigerair-to-strengthen-sia-s-position-ceo/3261258.html >.

Taylor, CM, Karunaratne, CV &amp; Xie, N 2012, ‘Glycosides of hydroxyproline: some recent, unusual discoveries’, Glycobiology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 757-767.

Teichert, Shehu & von Wartburg 2008, 'Customer segmentation revisited: The case of the airline industry', Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 227-242, viewed 25 February 2016, < http://ac.els-cdn.com.ezproxy.lib.rmit.edu.au/S0965856407000729/1-s2.0-S0965856407000729-main.pdf?_tid=0ff1186a-fb6b-11e6-bc47-00000aab0f6b&acdnat=1488034972_336351937a259a4a7b32f678e50cbc7a >.

The Straits Times 2016, Scoot, Tigerair in alliance of 8 Asian budget airlines, viewed  8 March 2017, < http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/scoot-tigerair-in-alliance-of-8-asian-budget-airlines >.

Tigerair 2014, Tigerair Signs Deal For Long-Term Fleet Renewal And Expansion, Tigerair, viewed 16 March 2017, < https://www.tigerair.com/news/TH_20140324_Tigerair_Signs_Deal_For_Long_Term_Fleet_Renewal_And_Expansion.pdf >

Tigerair 2017, Destinations, Lowest Fares Guaranteed, Tigerair, viewed 19 March 2017, < http://www.tigerair.com/sg/en/destination_map.php >.

Tigerair 2017, Careers, Tigerair, viewed 28 March 2017, < http://www.tigerair.com/sg/en/careers.php >.

Travel Daily Asia 2017, Tigerair adds new routes to India, China, Travel Daily Asia, viewed 15 March 2017 < http://www.traveldailymedia.com/225797/tigerair-adds-new-routes-to-india-china/ >.

Wright, P., Kroll, M., Tu, H., & Helms, M. 1991, ‘Generic Strategies and Business performance: an empirical study of the screw machine product industry’, British Journal of management, vol. 2, pp.1-9, viewed 11 March 2017, < http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1991.tb00016.x >.