Week 2 Assignment

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content

105 – 0 points

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Synthesis of Knowledge

Focus/Thesis

45 – 0 points

45 to 42 points

Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.

41 to 39 points

Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.

38 to 1 points

Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment

0 points

Foundation of Knowledge

30 – 0 points

30 to 28 points

Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.

27 to 26 points

Student exhibits above-average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above-average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.

25 to 1 points

The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concern in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area

0 points

Application of Knowledge

(Critical Thinking Skills

30 – 0 points

30 to 28 points*

Student demonstrates a higher level of critical thinking necessary for graduate-level work. Student provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment.

27 to 26 points*

Student exhibits a good command of critical-thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above-average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.

25 to 1 points*

Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment. Student presents a limited perspective on key concepts throughout assignment. Student appears to have problems applying information in a problem-solving manner.

0 points

Structure

45 – 0 points

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Organization of Ideas Format

15 – 0 points

15 to 14 points

Student thoroughly understands and excels at explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence.

13 points

Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the assignment. Student demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and organizing material in assignment. Student presents an above-average level of preparedness, with few formatting errors

12 to 1 points

Student applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a continuous pattern of logical sequencing.

0 points

Writing Skill

15 – 0 points

15 to 14 points*

Student demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, as well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style. Presents a thorough, extensive understanding of word usage. Student excels in the selection and development of a well-planned research assignment. Assignment is error-free and reflects student’s ability to prepare graduate-level writing for possible publication in a peer-reviewed (refereed) journal.

13 points*

Student provides an effective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment reflects student’s ability to select appropriate word usage and presents an above-average presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be well written with no more than 3 errors. Student provides a good final product that covers the above-minimal requirements.

12 to 1 points*

Assignment provides a basic, but borderline, perspective of student’s research abilities. Student has incorporated less than 3 sources, which does not attempt to cover key elements of assignment.

0 points

Research Skill

15 – 0 points

15 to 14 points*

Student provides sophisticated synthesis of complex body of information in the preparation of assignment. Research provided by student contributes significantly to the development of the overall thesis. Student incorporates at least 7 peer-reviewed journal articles in assignment. Student incorporates a variety of research resources and methodology in the preparation of assignment.

13 points*

Student achieves an above-average synthesis of research, but interpretation is narrow in scope and description within assignment. Assignment contains 4–6 peer-reviewed journal articles, and presents an average overview of key concepts.

12 to 1 points*

Assignment provides a basic, but borderline, perspective of student’s research abilities. Student has incorporated 3 or fewer peer-reviewed journal articles, which does not attempt to cover key elements of assignment.

0 points