1300 word minimum 3 scholarly sources due 2/26

profileWahonda7
Readunit3.pptx

Worrall & Moore, Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure, 1e

Chapter 5

Inchoate Crimes

© 2014 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

1

CHAPTER OBJECTIVES

5.1

5.1

5.1

5.1

Explain the relationship of attempt to the substantive offense.

Summarize the defenses to charges of attempt.

Summarize what constitutes attempt.

Explain the concept of inchoate crimes.

© 2014 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

2

CHAPTER OBJECTIVES

5.2

5.2

5.2

5.2

Describe the defenses to conspiracy.

Distinguish solicitation from other inchoate crimes.

Describe solicitation.

Identify the elements and complications of conspiracy.

© 2014 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

3

Explain the Concept of Inchoate Crimes

Learning Objectives

After this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes

5.1

4

5.1

© 2014 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

5

5.1

6

Inchoate Crimes

Conspiracy

6

Explain the Relationship of Attempt to the Substantive Offense

Learning Objectives

After this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes

5.1

7

8

5.1

The defendant has the specific intent to commit the underlying offense and takes some action in furtherance of that intent, but is unsuccessful in completing the crime.

Attempt

8

5.1

There is no crime of attempt that is not LINKED to another substantive crime.

Attempted

Crime

Completed

Substantive

Offense

9

Linked

5.1

A defendant cannot be guilty of both the attempted and completed crime.

Attempt

9

Summarize What Constitutes an Attempt

Learning Objectives

After this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes

5.1

10

5.1

11

Elements of a Crime

=Actus Reus

=Mens Rea

Intent to Commit

Crime

Overt Act Towards

Commission

Failure to Complete

Apparent Possibility of Commission

11

12

5.1

Physical

Proximity

Probable Desistance

Unequivocality

MPC

Substantial

Step

Last Act

Dangerous

Proximity

Indispensible

Element

Actus Reus Tests for Attempt

12

5.1

13

NAME TEST
Last Act The offender committed the last act necessary to complete the target crime
Physical Proximity The offender is “nearly able” to complete the crime
Indispensable Element The offender’s conduct is in “dangerous proximity to success”
Probable Desistance Unlikely the offender will stop his activities towards commission of the crime
Unequivocality A normal law abiding citizen views the offender’s actions as criminal
MPC Substantial Step Offender takes a substantial step that corroborates the criminal purpose

Actus Reus Tests for Attempt

Summarize Defenses to Charges of Attempt

Learning Objectives

After this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes

5.1

14

Impossibility

It is impossible to commit the attempt

Abandonment Complete and voluntary change of heart

15

5.1

Defenses to Attempt

15

16

5.1

Factual Impossibility :

Extraneous circumstances prevent the defendant from completing the crime

Legal Impossibility:

The action the defendant intends to perform is not a crime, even if completed

vs.

Factual vs. Legal Impossibility

16

Identify the Elements and Complications of Conspiracy

Learning Objectives

After this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes

5.2

17

18

5.2

Conspiracy

An agreement reached to commit a crime, with some states also requiring an overt act in furtherance of the crime.

18

5.2

19

Agreement

Overt Act

(only some states)

Specific Intent

=Actus Reus

=Mens Rea

Elements of a Crime

19

5.2

Corrupt

Motive

Corrupt Motives Doctrine:

Some states require that the agreement has an evil purpose in order to commit conspiracy

© 2014 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

20

Types of Conspiracies

5.2

Spoke and Wheel: one central actor (the hub) has control of all aspects of the conspiracy, while the others (the spokes) only control one aspect

Chain: the individuals at one end of the conspiracy are not aware of the individuals at the other end

Wheel and Chain: a conspiracy with attributes of both the spoke and wheel and chain conspiracies

21

5.2

22

Imports Drugs

Runs

Gambling

Ring

Bribes Police

Murders Rival

Mafia Boss

Runs

Prostitution

Ring

Mafia Boss

Example of a Spoke and Wheel Conspiracy

22

Drug Lord

Buys

Large

Shipment

Sold to

Smaller

Street

Dealers

Sold to

College

Student at

Party

23

5.2

Transported

to

NYC

Smuggled

into

U.S.

Drugs Grown

in

Columbia

Gang in

Arizona

Buys

Drugs

Example of a Chain Conspiracy

23

Describe the Defenses to Conspiracy

Learning Objectives

After this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes

5.2

24

5.2

Defenses to

Conspiracy

Abandonment

Withdrawal

Impossibility

Wharton’s Rule

© 2014 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

25

5.2

Wharton’s Rule: a conspiracy cannot occur when two persons are required for the commission.

26

Describe Solicitation

Learning Objectives

After this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes

5.2

27

5.2

Words

Commanding

or Urging the

Commission of

a Crime

Specific

Intent

Solicitation

© 2014 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

28

5.2

Solicitation

Solicitation occurs when a person entices, advises, incites, orders, or otherwise encourages someone else to commit a crime.

For solicitation, there is no requirement that the crime actually be completed.

Solicitation is typically limited to felonies or misdemeanors that involve either obstruction of justice or breach of peace.

Solicitation does not occur if one person uses another as an “innocent instrumentality” in the commission of a crime.

29

Distinguish Solicitation from other Inchoate Crimes

Learning Objectives

After this lecture, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes

5.2

30

5.2

Solicitation

Conspiracy

An “Offer” to

Commit a Crime

An “Agreement” to Commit a Crime

Solicitation is distinguished from conspiracy. In general, solicitation is an attempted conspiracy.

© 2014 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

31

An inchoate crime is one that is partial, unfinished, or begun and not completed.

Criminal attempt is an adjunct crime, meaning it cannot exist by itself. There is no crime of attempt that is not linked to some other substantive crime.

Attempt occurs when the defendant has the specific intent to commit the underlying offense and takes some action in furtherance of that intent, but is unsuccessful in completing the crime.

Legal impossibility is generally a defense to the crime of attempt, while factual impossibility is not. Abandonment is sometimes available as a defense in the attempt context.

CHAPTER SUMMARY

5.1

5.1

5.1

5.1

© 2014 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

32

Conspiracy is an agreement reached to commit a crime, in some states an overt act in furtherance of the crime is also required.

The four main defenses to conspiracy are abandonment, withdrawal, impossibility, and Wharton’s Rule.

Solicitation occurs when a person entices, advises, incites, orders, or otherwise encourages someone else to commit a crime.

Solicitation is distinguished from conspiracy. In general, solicitation is an attempted conspiracy.

CHAPTER SUMMARY

5.2

5.2

5.2

5.2

© 2014 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved

33