EVOLUTION OF EMPLOYER-BASED GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE: FROM INDEMNITY/SERVICE PLANS TO MANAGED HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS – THROUGH 2000

profilethebrat
READING1.C.NATIONALTRANSITIONFROMINDEMNITYSERVICEPLANSTOMANAGEDHEALTHINSURANCE-3.docx

HSA 312

MANAGED HEALTH CARE

SPRING 2021 L. EITEL

READING 1.C.:

THE CRISIS OF THE PREVAILING EMPLOYER-BASED INDEMNITY/SERVICE PLAN, THE MASSIVE SHIFT TO MANAGED HEALTH CARE PLANS 1988-1996, AND THE MANAGED CARE BACKLASH

I. HEALTH INSURANCE IN THE UNITED STATES: CRISIS AND TRANSITION – LATE 1960s THROUGH EARLY 1990s

CHALLENGES TO THE SUSTAINABILITY OF THE EMPLOYER-BASED GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE MODEL FROM THE 1960’S THROUGH THE EARLY 1970S.

A. The influx of Medicare and Medicaid recipients making demands on the U.S. Health Care services system beginning in the late 1960s interacted in a variety of complicated ways with other changes going on in that system to produce substantive and unprecedented increases in the portion of Gross Domestic Product allocated to health care services, and in sustained year-to-year increases in National Health Expenditures.

These substantive increases in price and expenditure started to threaten the stability of the prevailing system of Indemnity and Service health insurance plans – would premiums become unaffordable for workers and their employers? How would that impact on the accessibility and affordability of health insurance for a large percentage of the American population?

B. Managed Care and HMOs began to be seen by some politicians, policy makers, academicians, and advocates of the primacy of Primary Care as a quality-oriented answer to the prevailing health insurance system’s inability to address massive, sustained price and expenditure increases. President Nixon and Congress in 1973 approved the HMO Act of 1973, which played a major role in the 1970s and 1980s in starting the spread of Managed Care Health plans beyond their East and West Coast strongholds and breaking down local resistance to the previously marginalized Managed Care health insurance plans.

II. Federal Government Support for the Spread of Managed Health Insurance in the Early 1970s: The HMO Act of 1973

A. The Federal government, early on recognizing the beginnings of a real crisis in health care expenditures and pricing, embraced the idea of Managed Care in order to encourage the spread of a form of health insurance which could actually control health care expenditures.

B. The Federal government, through the 1973 HMO Act broke down barriers to the spread of Managed Health plans throughout the U.S., laying the groundwork for the slow but steady expansion in Managed Health plan enrollees in the 1980s.

C. This Act preempted individual State laws which prevented the spread of Managed Health Insurance Plans outside of their strongholds in Washington State, California, New York City, and Washington, D.C.

D. This Act provided grants and start-up funds to encourage the spread of Managed Health Insurance Plans.

E. This Act required all Employers who offered health insurance to their Employees, and who employed a certain minimum of Employees, to offer at least one (1) Managed Health Insurance Plan as one of the health insurance options they offered to their Employees.

III. THE MASS MOVEMENT OF AMERICANS WITH EMPLOYER-BASED GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE FROM INDEMNITY AND SERVICE PLANS TO MANAGED CARE HEALTH PLANS 1988 - 1996.

A. Throughout the late 1970s through the 1980s, Blue Cross and Blue Shield health insurers, and large commercial health insurers, tried to maintain and save the Indemnity and Service plans in which the vast majority of Americans with employer-based insurance were enrolled.

(As late as 1988 73% of American workers and their families who were covered by employer-based private group health insurance were enrolled in those Indemnity and Service plans.)

Indemnity and Service Plans had originally been thoroughly opposed to the idea and practice of Managed Care (as exemplified in the Kaiser-Permanente Model). These plans followed the principles of non-interference in the practice of medicine, unrestricted consumer choice of a health care service provider, and non-interference in the decisions of patients and physicians about the preferred place of and treatment for a given medical condition .

B. In part inspired by Federal government experiments in Utilization Review and Management, these plans started to adopt some aspects of Managed Health Plan/HMO practice in order to constrain annual expenditure increases for Personal Health Care Services. They adopted Large Case Management programs, Utilization Review programs, and used other medical management tools traditionally uses by Managed Health Insurance plans, and thus started to do just what physicians and hospitals had feared prior to 1930 – they started to involve themselves in decisions of length of treatment, type of treatment, appropriateness of treatment, and place of treatment for some health insurance plan members.

These changes in health insurance plan management and philosophy did not have a significant impact on health expenditures, and were not likely to keep premiums and out-of-pocket expenditures from increasing substantially. These changes did not significantly impact rapidly rising prices of health care goods and services, nor did they affect the significant year-to-year increases in national health expenditures and health insurance premiums.

C. Faced with the likelihood of severely disappointing employers and employees by substantially increasing premiums and out-of-pocket expenditures, and reducing benefits covered by the Indemnity and Service Plans, the major insurers faced a collapse in the health insurance system which had prevailed since the 1930’s, with a resulting threat to the welfare of employees and the viability of the private group health insurance industry.

D. Blue Cross and Blue Shield health insurance plans, all the plans managed by commercial insurers, and the newer insurance companies which focused more heavily on providing Managed Health Insurance Plans, worked with employers to transition most Americans with employer-based health insurance to Managed Health Insurance Plans between 1988 and 1996 .

It was believed that only Managed Health Insurance Plans would allow those companies to continue offering generous packages of health insurance benefits, and would enable them to control the growth in personal health care expenditures, prices, and the volume of services produced. The price of maintaining the private group health insurance industry’s viability would be the wholesale movement of employer-based group health insurance enrollees to Managed Health Insurance Plans.

E. Between 1988 and 1996 the relative significance of Indemnity/Service Plans and Managed Care Plans in the lives of American employees and their families was reversed. By 1996 73% of American workers with employer-based group health insurance were enrolled in those Managed Health Insurance Plans. By 2000 92% of those workers and their families were in Managed Health Insurance Plans – HMOs, Point of Service Plans, and Preferred Provider Organizations.

F. This massive change in the type of health insurance most Americans relied upon to ensure their access to affordable health care services was dramatic and for many Americans a shock. Previously, access to acute care services, diagnostic services, specialty services including consultations, and the full array of personal health care services involved minimal interference from the health insurance plans. Now most Americans would face limits on that access, especially in the form of having to access most services with approval either from an assigned Primary Care Practitioner, or from medical management personnel associated with the respective insurance plans.

1