Week 5 PPOL 650 Reflective Comments 5

Student:

5 Points

4 Points

3 Points

0–2 Points

Critical

Thinking

Rich in content:

full of thought, insight, and analysis. Ideas are critiqued in light of a biblical worldview.

Substantial information:

a degree of thought, insight, and analysis has taken place.

Generally competent:

information is thin and commonplace.

Rudimentary and superficial:

no analysis or insight is displayed.

Connections

The summaries are reflective. Ideas are critiqued in light of a biblical worldview. Clear connections to real-life situations.

New connections lack depth and/or detail.

Limited, if any, connections. Vague generalities.

No connections are made. Off topic.

Uniqueness

New ideas and connections display depth and detail.

New ideas and connections lack depth and/or detail.

Few, if any, new ideas or connections, simply restates or summarizes.

No new ideas or connections are explained.

Timeliness

All required postings submitted, adding new entries each time.

Most required postings submitted, adding new entries each time.

Some postings submitted.

All required postings missing.

Stylistics

Few grammatical or stylistic errors. Reflections are 150–200 words. Summaries are 100–125 words. Written in paragraph form.

Some grammatical or stylistic errors. Reflections are 150–200 words. Summaries are 100–125 words. Written in paragraph form.

Obvious grammatical or stylistic errors that interfere with content. Reflections and summaries have less than the required amount of words.

Obvious grammatical or stylistic errors that make understanding impossible. The required amounts of words are not met.

Total ____________________________/25