help

Ratings.docx

Ratings	Pts
On time	5 pts On Time Turned in before the deadline. 0 pts Late Turned in after the deadline.	5 / 5 pts
Audience	5 pts Exemplary Reads like an actual document meant for the audience in question. 3 pts Average Well structured for the audience but is missing some opportunities to be written for the specific audience. Could be more polished/more specific in formatting and/or content. 1 pts Missing Written for a different audience/lack of effort to write towards the audience defined in the assignment Comments Spent a bit too long on generalities of earthquakes. For a newspaper article, this is called burying the lede aka not focusing on the important stuff.	3 / 5 pts
Content	5 pts Exemplary Outstanding explanation with superior supporting information; unusual insights and flashes of brilliance; creative and original analyses and thoughts; goes well beyond the minimum required for the assignment. 4 pts Good Complete explanation, with comprehensive support from examples, data, figures, etc.; excellent reasoning and/or explanation; goes beyond the minimum required for the assignment. 3 pts Average Satisfactory job; does what the assignment asks; decent reasoning or explanations; reasonable support by data, figures, examples, etc.; overall, fair work. 2 pts Developing Fair explanation, but too general, or some inaccuracies or flaws in reasoning, or coverage is accurate but cursory; does not meet the minimum required for a complete answer. 1 pts Poor Does not effectively address assignment; fails to support assertions with data or examples; does not address the topic at hand; unclear explanations; inadequate understanding; major flaws in reasoning. Comments How large was the earthquake? When did it happen (other than 2010)? Too general about recovery.	2 / 5 pts
Writing	5 pts Exemplary Meets criteria for Good, but also has a sense of style, going beyond grammatical correctness to real readability. 4 pts Good Excellent paper/paragraph organization; interesting sentences, good grammar, and VERY few spelling errors; does not read like a first draft. 3 pts Average Decent organization; serviceable prose; reads like a first draft; many spelling errors and clearly not proofread (even if otherwise excellent). 2 pts Developing Disorganized; awkward sentence structure; poor grammar and spelling. 1 pts Poor Similar problems to Developing, but worse	4 / 5 pts
Citations	5 pts Exemplary All references and citations are correctly written and present. 3 pts Average Citations are mostly present but are missing in-text citations and/or correct formatting. 1 pts Missing Reference and citation errors detract significantly from paper. Generally, this is because the bibliography section is missing entirely.	5 / 5 pts
Total Points: 19