World history
Don-albertos
Highlight
Don-albertos
Highlight
calling for oppression of minority, violence
Don-albertos
Highlight
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
Theme of Ignorance
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
Theme of Hate- he deemed other races despicable by their very existence
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
1. Theme of Colonialism. Rhodes calling for colonization of Africa
2. Did Rhodes assume the race that existed in Africa did not need its resources? was that the reason he called for occupation of its territory?
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
Theme
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
Does difference in culture make one culture superior and the other one backward?
-Christianity and British laws are not basic elements of civilised society.
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
from attack by other races?
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
-A clear admission that indeed Britain was substantially benefiting from colonization especially in Africa.
-Theme of colonization
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
-Theme of War, Violence and aggression in order to conquer the African territories
-
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
self-entitlement. UK was posed as owner of the territory and the territory are just waiting to be exploited
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
Theme of hypocrisy. Pretending to civilise Africa by exploiting her resources for personal gain
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
-Theme of violence
-Greed and self-entitlement made him think that Britain ought to exploit the areas as if its theirs.
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
Did the colonialist view colonialism as a favor to Africa? was Africa really suffering from barbarism, slave trade where the cure was colonialism?
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
What people were to prosper out of this civilization exercise? the original owners
Don-albertos
Highlight
Don-albertos
Highlight
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
-The Darwin's theory of natural selection was misconstrued by social Darwinists .
-
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
disregard of human rights
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
Did such tribes really need the so called civilization? These tribes claerly never wanted to compete with other races.
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
Superiority complex
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
Hypocrisy. Colonizing America and Africa was not to help exploit the resources for their own good but for the benefit of the colonizers.
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
The struggle of race against another is just about control and power over the other
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
theme of War and Violence
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
Theme of violence, Loss of life
Don-albertos
Sticky Note
The external questions:
What kind of document is it?)
This is a philosophical document on Racial Nationalism
Who wrote it? What kind of person wrote it?
It’s a combination of several texts written by nationalists who believed their race was superior to others. These were Europeans from Britain and a German.
When was the document written?
The contents were written around 19th and early 20th century.
What was going on when it was written? In other words, what is the context of the document?
The context of the documents was period of scramble and partition of Africa. The German and British superiority over the rest of the world was being promoted.
Why was the written?
The texts were written to depict racial superiority. By the fact that one is born belonging to a given race, that person stands superior and the rest of the races inferior. Such a person ought to dominate the inferior races and exploit them.
For whom was it written? What was the document trying to achieve?
The texts were written for Germans and British citizens to champion them to spearhead their racial superiority and occupy the inferior races. That was to be done for the benefit of such superior races. For example, colonization was depicted as necessary for UK society to support its growing population as shown by Cecil Rhodes.
Then internal factors:
What are the oppositions? And equations?
There is clear opposition. However, the act of aggression can get opposition from the perceived inferior races.
What kind of rhetoric/metaphors?
Primary metaphor- The cross-breed of grey-hounds with pit bull which led to loss of some essential is compared to what will happen to Germans when they cross-breed with other races, they will lose the race’s ‘greatness’/superiority.
What are the author’s assumptions? Especially unspoken assumptions?
The authors of the texts assume superior features such intellectual, physical, psychological capabilities among other capabilities are inherent. The fact that one belongs to the race; such a person has all such features. The second assumption is that the so called inferior race was dying for superior race’s assistance for survival hence the need for their ‘civilization’
What do you think we might learn from this document from an historical
Perspective?
We might learn that racism was deeply entrenched for years and taught as if it’s the gospel truth through national platform hence reason is still an issue to date. Secondly, we learn that most of the wars occurring around the world are first groomed within societal circles before it actually happens in fronts. For example, speeches advocating for need to conquer Africa preceded the actual conquest.