Read and Finish! Simple, easy, need finish in 18 hrs
Diversity in Families Tenth Edition
Chapter 6
Race, Class, and Gender
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Slides in this presentation contain hyperlinks. JAWS users should be able to get a list of links by using INSERT+F7
The majority of these slides originate from the publisher of your text. However, I have annotated and added material.
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Race, Class, and Gender
Class, Race, and Gender as Structural Inequalities
6.1 - Explain the terms class, race, and gender as structural inequalities
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 6-1 People and Families in Poverty (1 of 4)
Table 6.1 People and Families in poverty by Selected Characteristics, 2011
Characteristics Below Poverty Percent
People People
Total 15
Family Status Family Status
In families 13.1
Householder 11.8
Related children under 18 21.4
In unrelated subfamilies 43.4
Reference person 40.6
Children under 18 48.4
Unrelated individual 22.8
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 6-1 People and Families in Poverty (2 of 4)
Table 6.1 People and Families in poverty by Selected Characteristics, 2011
Characteristics Below Poverty Percent
Sex Sex
Male 13.6
Female 16.3
Race Race
White 12.8
White, non-Hispanic 9.8
Black 27.6
Asian 12.3
Hispanic origin 25.3
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 6-1 People and Families in Poverty (3 of 4)
Table 6.1 People and Families in poverty by Selected Characteristics, 2011
Characteristics Below Poverty Percent
Age Age
Under 18 21.9
18 – 64 years 13.7
65 years and older 8.7
Nativity Nativity
Native 14.4
Foreign born 19
Naturalized citizen 12.5
Not a citizen 24.3
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 6-1 People and Families in Poverty (4 of 4)
Table 6.1 People and Families in poverty by Selected Characteristics, 2011
Source: DeNavas-Walt, Carmen, Bernadette D. Proctor, and Jessica C. Smith, U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P60-243, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2011. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2012, p. 14 & 17.
Characteristics Below Poverty Percent
Region Region
Northeast 13.1
Midwest 14
South 16
West 15.8
Type of family Type of family
Married couple 6.2
Female householder (no husband present) 31.2*
Male householder (no wife present) 16.1 *Please link this to the reading about non-resident fathers.
Class 6.2 - Explain how class shapes family life
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
6.2 Class (1 of 2)
• The Cultural Approach
– Suggests each class has distinct cultures
– Culture of poverty
– Shortcomings of the cultural approach – Most families are not poor because of lack of motivation, but because of structural change in their situation. These include, but are not limited to a family break-up, an extended illness, or job loss.
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
GINI COEFFICIENT OR INDEX
• The next two tables show the GINI Coefficient
• The Gini Index is a summary measure of income inequality. The Gini coefficient incorporates the detailed shares data into a single statistic, which summarizes the dispersion of income across the entire income distribution. The Gini coefficient ranges from 0, indicating perfect equality (where everyone receives an equal share), to 1, perfect inequality (where only one recipient or group of recipients receives all the income). The Gini is based on the difference between the Lorenz curve (the observed cumulative income distribution) and the notion of a perfectly equal income distribution.
• https://www.census.gov/topics/income-poverty/income- inequality/about/metrics/gini-index.html
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 6-2 Share of Aggregate Income (1 of 2)
Table 6.2 Share of Aggregate Income by Each Fifth of Households, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2011
Percentage Distribution of Aggregate Income
Year Lowest Fifth
Second Fifth
Third Fifth
Fourth Fifth
Highest Fifth
Gini Index
2011 3.2 8.4 14.3 23.0 51.1 .477
2010 3.3 8.5 14.6 23.4 50.3 .470
2007 3.4 8.7 14.8 23.4 49.7 .463
2004 3.4 8.7 14.7 23.2 50.1 .466
2000 3.6 8.9 14.9 23.0 49.6 .460
Note the increase in income inequality measured by GINI coefficient. This is Bernie Sanders big thing. The middle class is eroding. However, it looks like it came down to 0.433 in 2016. We have the highest GINI index for all G7 countries.
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 6-2 Share of Aggregate Income (2 of 2)
Table 6.2 Share of Aggregate Income by Each Fifth of Households, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2011
Percentage Distribution of Aggregate Income
Year Lowest Fifth
Second Fifth
Third Fifth
Fourth Fifth
Highest Fifth
Gini Index
1990 3.9 9.6 15.9 24.0 46.6 .428
1980 4.3 10.3 16.9 24.9 43.7 .403
1970 4.1 10.8 17.4 24.5 43.3 .394
Source: DeNavas-Walt, Carmen, Bernadette D, Proctor, and Jessica C. Smith, U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P60-243, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2011. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2012, p. 8.
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
6.2 Class (2 of 2)
• The Structural Approach pp.89-94 in your text.
– Privilege and class privilege
– Families in today’s class continuum
– Families in poverty
– Blue-collar families
– Middle-class families
– Families of professionals
– Wealthy families
Race 6.3 - Explain how race is related to family life
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
6.3 Race
• Racial-ethnic families
– The cultural approach
– Shortcomings of the cultural approach
▪ The cultural approach reduces families to their culture, making an ecological fallacy
▪ View family as the force that affects social structure rather than social structure as the force that affects family.
▪ It blames the victims by ignoring structural racism
▪ It does recognize the diversity within race and/or ethnicity.
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
6.3.1 Racial Ethnic Families
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 6-3 Projected Population of the United States by
Race
*Includes American Indian and Alaska Native alone, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, and Two or More Races. Source: U.S. Census Bureau (2004). “U.S. Interim Projection by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin.” Internet Release Date: March 18, 2004
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
6.3.2 Structural Inequalities and Racial-Ethnic Families (1 of 2)
• Structural Inequalities and Racial-Ethnic Families
– Segregated neighborhoods
– Class variation
– Racial wealth gap
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 6.3-2a Persons by Household Type, Race, and
Ethnicity, 2011
Blank Married couple
Female householder
Male householder
Non-family household
Total
Hispanic 57.2 23.5 10.1 9.1 100.00
Native born 56.0 26.7 9.0 8.3 100.00
Foreign-born 59.4 17.9 12.2 10.6 100.00
White alone, not Hispanic
64.7 11.6 5.0 18.7 100.00
Black alone, not Hispanic
35.9 40.1 7.4 16.6 100.00
Asian alone, not Hispanic
72.1 10.2 5.7 12.0 100.00
Other, not Hispanic 53.7 25.6 8.3 12.4 100.00
All 60.0 17.4 6.3 16.3 100.00
Source: Pew Hispanic Center tabulations of 2011 American Community Survey Statistical Portrait of Hispanics in the United States, 2012. Table 17: Persons by Household Type, Race, and Ethnicity, 2011. Retrieved April 1, 2013. http://www.pewhispanic.org/20l3/02/15/statistical-portrait-of-hispanics-in-the-united-states-2011/
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Interpreting the table in the previous slide (6.3.2b)
• The table percentages are computed horizontally, which in a bit unusual.
• Compare the cells in one column vertically to understand the table.
• Be ready to answer questions about household structure on the next quiz.
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
6.3.2 Structural Inequalities and Racial-Ethnic Families (2 of 2)
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 6-5 Median Income by Race and Family (2011) (1 of 2)
White Alone White Alone
Married couple families $78,311
Wife in paid labor force $94,355
Wife not in paid labor force $54,055
Male household, no spouse present $47,675
Female household, no spouse present $36,041
Black Alone Black Alone
Married couple families $64,626
Wife in paid labor force $75,101
Wife not in paid labor force $42,475
Male household, no spouse present $36,477
Female household, no spouse present $25,309
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 6-5 Median Income by Race and Family (2011) (2 of 2)
Hispanic Hispanic
Married couple families $49,528
Wife in paid labor force $63,170
Wife not in paid labor force $34,497
Male household, no spouse present $38,222
Female household, no spouse present $24,579
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey. 2012. Table F7: Type of Family (All Races) by Median and Mean Income. Detailed tables for each race can be accessed at: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/families/ .is no longer online
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
6.3.3 African American Families in the Twenty First
Century (1 of 2)
• African American Families in the Twenty-First Century
– Marriage – see pages 102-103 in your text
– Social support networks - see pages 103-104 in your text
– Inner city families and the underclass debate – see pages 103-104 in your text
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 6-6 U.S. Poverty Rates by Race and Ethnicity
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
6.3.3 African American Families in the Twenty-First
Century (2 of 2)
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Figure 6-7 Marital Status by Race and Ethnicity, 2012 Blank Now
married Separated Divorced Widowed Never
married Total
Hispanic 43.4 3.6 8.3 3.3 41.4 100.00
Native born 33.0 2.8 9.0 2.9 52.3 100.00
Foreign-born 54.5 4.4 7.7 3.8 29.7 100.00
White alone, not Hispanic
52.6 1.6 11.8 6.8 27.1 100.00
Black alone, not Hispanic
28.9 4.3 12.0 6.0 48.8 100.00
Asian alone, not Hispanic
58.2 1.3 5.0 4.4 31.1 100.00
Other, not Hispanic
36.7 2.5 11.5 3.9 45.4 100.00
All 48.3 2.2 11.0 6.0 32.5 100.00
Source: Pew Hispanic Center tabulations of 2011 American Community Survey Statistical Portrait of Hispanics in the United States, 2012. Table 16: Marital Status, by Race and Ethnicity, 2011. Retrieved April 1, 2013. http://www.pewhispanic.org/2013/02/15/statistical-portrait-of-hispanics-in-the-united-states-2011/
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
6.3.4 Latinx Families in the Twenty-First Century (1 of 2)
• Latino Families in the Twenty-First Century
– A Hispanic underclass?
– Extended kinship systems
• More Racial-Ethnic Diversity in Families: Asians, Native Americans, and Middle Easterners
– Model minority
– Diversity
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
6.3.5 More Racial-Ethnic Diversity in Families: Asians, Native
Americans, and Middle Easterners
Gender 6.4 - Explain how most family issues are related to gender
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
6.4 Gender (1 of 2)
• The Traditional Gender Roles Approach
– Talcott Parsons
– Structural functionalism
• Shortcomings of the Gender Roles Approach
– Role division not functional
– Families are integrated, not separate
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
6.4 Gender (2 of 2)
• The Family as a Gendered Institution
– Patriarchy – The definition is rule by fathers. Think about social structures that support patriarchy within today’s society? If you go to church or mosque, what are the teachings about patriarchy?
– Locus of struggle
– Agency within constraint - I always see the gender struggle differently than other group struggles. We may be able to live our lives without ever really caring about another person from a different race or ethnicity, or even a differing sexual orientation, but we all know and love someone from another gender.
– Every student at an HBCU should read Patricia Hill Collin’s book “Black Feminist Thought.” She is the first recognized African American scholar to produce knowledge about the intersectionality of race and gender. She developed the matrix on domination.
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
6.4.1 The Traditional Gender Roles Approach