Question 1 Match the following sensitivity parameters to the appropriate definition 1. Shadow Price Reduced Cost Objective Function Coefficient Changes
Question 1
Match the following sensitivity parameters to the appropriate definition
|
|
|
Shadow Price |
|
|
|
|
Reduced Cost |
|
|
|
Objective Function Coefficient Changes |
|
|
1.
|
|
Question 2
Sensitivity Analysis in Linear programming problems
|
|
1. |
Indicates the effect of changes in the problem data |
|
|
2. |
Can tell the decision maker if the current optimal solution will remain so if an objective function coefficient changes |
|
|
3. |
Can provide the worth of additional resources |
|
|
4. |
All of the above |
|
|
5. |
None of the above |
Question 3
Assume the shadow price for a given resource of a maximization problem is 16. On this basis, what would be most beneficial option for company ABC
|
|
1. |
Increases resources to allowable level if unit price of resource is $20 |
|
|
2. |
Increases resources to allowable level if unit price of resource is $12 |
|
|
3. |
Decreases resources to allowable level if unit price of resource is $20 |
|
|
4. |
Increases resources to allowable level if unit price of resource is $22 |
Question 4
Refer to problem 2 on page 254 of the text (Vivian s Gems) What would Vivian s profit be if 35 rubies were available?
|
|
1. |
$71 |
|
|
2. |
$59 |
|
|
3. |
$67 |
|
|
4. |
Cannot determine since the change is outside the range of optimality |
|
|
5. |
None of the above |
Question 5
1. Refer to problem 2 on page 254 of the text (Vivian s Gems) If type 2 gems sold for only $5.50, what would be the new optimal solution to the problem
|
|
1. |
$64 |
|
|
2. |
$60 |
|
|
3. |
$67 |
|
|
4. |
Cannot determine since the change is outside the range of optimality |
|
|
5. |
None of the above |
Question 6
1. Refer to problem 2 on page 254 of the text (Vivian s Gems). What would Vivian s profit be if at least 12 type 1 gems had to be produced?
|
|
1. |
$64 |
|
|
2. |
$60 |
|
|
3. |
$67 |
|
|
4. |
Cannot determine since the change is outside the range of optimality |
|
|
5. |
None of the above |
Question 7
1. Refer to problem 2 on page 254 of the text (Vivian s Gems). A vendor offers to sell 2 diamonds at a cost of $1 above current prices. What would Vivian s new profit be given Vivian accepts the offer?
|
|
1. |
$64 |
|
|
2. |
$60 |
|
|
3. |
$67 |
|
|
4. |
Cannot determine since the change is outside the range of optimality |
|
|
5. |
None of the above |
Question 8
1. Refer to problem 2 on page 254 of the text (Vivian s Gems)14. If type 1 gems sold for only $15, what would be the new optimal solution to the problem?
|
|
1. |
$64 |
|
|
2. |
$60 |
|
|
3. |
$67 |
|
|
4. |
Cannot determine since the change is outside the range of optimality |
|
|
5. |
None of the above |
Question 9
1. Refer to problem 2 on page 254 of the text (Vivian s Gems) What would Vivian s profit be if 46 diamonds were available?
|
|
1. |
$71 |
|
|
2. |
$59 |
|
|
3. |
$67 |
|
|
4. |
Cannot determine since the change is outside the range of optimality |
|
|
5. |
None of the above |
Question 10
In a report of sensitivity analysis in a lindo LP output, if the original objective function coefficient is 6 and the allowable increase is 2.4, then if the coefficient were to become 7, there would be no change in the optimal values of the variable
|
|
1. |
true |
|
|
2. |
false |
Question 11
The results of sensitivity analysis establish ranges for the decision variables within which the current solution remains optimal
|
|
1. |
true |
|
|
2. |
false |
Question 12
It is possible, after a change in an objective function coefficient, to have an optimal solution with the same value for the decision variables but a different value for the objective function
|
|
1. |
true |
|
|
2. |
false |
Question 13
Right hand side sensitivity reveals provides details in the limitation of variable values that will cause changes in the RHS
|
|
1. |
true |
|
|
2. |
false |
Question 14
It has been determined that the optimal solution of a linear programming problem occurs at the intersection of the constraint lines 5x1 + 3x2 = 300 and 4x1 + 9x2 = 600. What can be said about the objective function with regards to sensitivity analysis
|
|
1. |
The constraints are maximized |
|
|
2. |
Its optimal value cannot exceed 600 |
|
|
3. |
The slope is between -5/3 and -4/9 |
|
|
4. |
The problem is infeasible |
Question 15
If sensitivity analysis shows an allowable increase of infinity for the objective coefficient range for variable x1, it means
|
|
1. |
The problem is unbound |
|
|
2. |
The value of x1 can increase without limit |
|
|
3. |
The objective function coefficient for x1 can increase without limit and variables will all have the same optimal values |
|
|
4. |
The objective function coefficient for x1 can increase without limit and all the variables except x1 will change their optimal value |
Question 16
The objective function Max 14x1 + 19x2 reflects the relevant cost of labor hours used in production. The correct interpretation of shadow price associated with the labor hours constraint is
|
|
1. |
The maximum premium over the normal price (say for overtime) the company would be willing to pay. |
|
|
2. |
The upper limit on the total hourly wage the company would be willing to pay |
|
|
3. |
The reduction in hours that could be sustained before the solution would change |
|
|
4. |
All of the above |
|
|
5. |
None of the above |
Question 17
|
|
1. |
true |
|
|
2. |
false |