English
Qualitative Research Paper Rubric
|
|
A |
B |
C |
D - F |
F |
|
Research Question 20 points |
18-20 Question is open-ended and appropriate to guide qualitative research. |
16-18 Question is open-ended and appropriate but not clearly articulated. |
14-15 Question articulated but EITHER is inappropriate for the assignment OR is not open-ended. |
14-1 Question articulated but is inappropriate for the assignment AND is not open-ended. |
0 No question articulated. |
|
Thesis 20 points |
18-20 Thesis provides a clear answer to the research question. |
16-18 Thesis provides an answer to the question but is not clearly articulated. |
14-15 Thesis provides an argument on the topic but displays no obvious connection to the research question. |
14-1 Thesis states unarguable facts, no argument. |
0 No answer/thesis in evidence. |
|
Research-based evidence 20 points |
18-20 Findings section presents research results clearly. Discussion section explains the meaning and relevance of those results in a way that supports the thesis. |
16-18 Findings and discussion sections presents some research results but lacks detail and / or connection to thesis. |
14-15 Findings and / or discussion section is missing detailed evidence from qualitative research AND completely lacks connection to thesis. |
14-1 Findings section presents research results as evidence, but research results are completely lacking from discussion section. |
0 No research / evidence provided. Discussion completely lacks reference to qualitative research results. |
|
Secondary sources 10 points |
9-10 Paper provides credible secondary sources to establish a reason for asking the research question and to provide background info on the topic. Sources are integrated properly and explained. |
8-9 Paper provides credible secondary sources to establish a reason for asking the research question and to provide background info on the topic. But sources are not integrated properly and/or explained. |
7-8 Paper provides secondary sources to establish a reason for asking the research question and to provide background info on the topic. But sources are not credible. |
7-1 Paper provides secondary sources to establish a reason for asking the research question and to provide background info on the topic. But sources are neither credible nor integrated properly and explained. |
0 Paper does not include secondary sources. |
|
Organization 10 points |
9-10 Paper uses the proper framework for qualitative research papers, including subheadings. Each section of the paper includes the appropriate information for that section as well as clear topic sentences. |
8-9 Paper uses the proper framework. Each section of the paper includes the appropriate information for that section and clear topic sentences but lacks heading titles |
7-8 Paper uses the proper framework for qualitative research papers, including subheadings. Each section of the paper includes the appropriate information for that section but lacks heading titles and/or clear topic sentences. |
7-1 Paper uses the proper framework for qualitative research papers. However, information appears in the wrong sections of the paper. |
0 The paper does not use the appropriate framework for a qualitative research paper. |
|
Citation 10 points |
9-10 Sources are cited correctly in the document and on the reference page. |
8-9 Sources are cited, but there are a few errors in the format. |
7-8 Sources are cited, but there are several errors in the format. |
7-1 Some of the sources are not cited and / or the format is incorrect. |
0 Sources are not cited at all/format is not correct. |
|
Formatting 5 points |
5 Paper correctly follows APA formatting, including a title page, abstract, header, page numbers, and reference page. |
4 Paper is mostly correctly formatted. |
3 Paper exhibits many errors in APA formatting. |
2-1 APA formatting is attempted, but several elements are missing or incorrect. |
0 APA is not attempted. |
|
Writing Fluency 5 points |
5 Skillful writing fluency exhibits few or no mechanical errors.
|
4 Reasonable writing fluency exhibits few mechanical errors.
|
3 Writing fluency is lacking, exhibits several mechanical errors.
|
2-1 Minimal writing fluency exhibits numerous mechanical errors.
|
0 Writing is not fluent— unreadable.
|