2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Analysis Overview and Contract Selection

1/24/2021 Feedback for 2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Analysis Overview and Contract Selection - QSO-349-J3611 Proj Contracting/Procurement 21EW3 - So…

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=1126120&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=638690 1/12

Feedback for 2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Analysis Overview and Contract Selection

Submission Feedback

Overall Feedback

Rubric Name: QSO 349 Milestone One Rubric

Hi Lava,

I'm a bit confused, because you re-did the first week's paper correctly, and parts of it were applicable to this paper (five contract types in the FAR). Please see the rubric and let me know if you have questions, thanks.

Critical Elements Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Overview: Purpose

1/24/2021 Feedback for 2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Analysis Overview and Contract Selection - QSO-349-J3611 Proj Contracting/Procurement 21EW3 - So…

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=1126120&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=638690 2/12

10 / 10

Overview: Basic Components

10 points

Comprehensively discusses the purpose of a procurement management plan

7.5 points

Discusses the purpose of a procurement management plan, but with gaps in detail

0 points

Does not discuss the purpose of a procurement management plan

Criterion Feedback

Nice, comprehensive discussion of why the procurement management plan is so important to project success.

1/24/2021 Feedback for 2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Analysis Overview and Contract Selection - QSO-349-J3611 Proj Contracting/Procurement 21EW3 - So…

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=1126120&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=638690 3/12

15 points

Comprehensively defines the basic components of a procurement management plan

11.25 points

Defines basic components of a procurement management plan, but with gaps in detail

0 points

Does not define basic components of a procurement management plan

1/24/2021 Feedback for 2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Analysis Overview and Contract Selection - QSO-349-J3611 Proj Contracting/Procurement 21EW3 - So…

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=1126120&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=638690 4/12

15 / 15

Overview: Satisfaction of Project Requirements

Criterion Feedback

Good overview of the basic components of the procurement management plan.

1/24/2021 Feedback for 2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Analysis Overview and Contract Selection - QSO-349-J3611 Proj Contracting/Procurement 21EW3 - So…

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=1126120&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=638690 5/12

11.25 / 15

Contract Types: Definition

15 points

Comprehensively explains how each major component of the procurement management plan satisfies the project or organizational requirements in the case study

11.25 points

Explains how components of the procurement management plan satisfy the project or organizational requirements in the case study, but with gaps in detail

0 points

Does not explain how each major component of a procurement management plan satisfies the project or organizational requirements in the case study

Criterion Feedback

I'd like more specific detail here on how the components apply to the case study; for example how does Harley Davidson use the SOW, schedule, risk plan, communications plan, etc. to satisfy the company's project requirements.

1/24/2021 Feedback for 2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Analysis Overview and Contract Selection - QSO-349-J3611 Proj Contracting/Procurement 21EW3 - So…

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=1126120&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=638690 6/12

0 / 10

Contract Types: Suitability

10 points

Accurately defines each type of contract

7.5 points

Defines each type of contract, but with gaps in accuracy

0 points

Does not define each type of contract

Criterion Feedback

I'm looking for the information you had here in the first paper: the five contract types defined by the FAR (fixed price, cost type, incentive, indefinite delivery, and time and materials).

1/24/2021 Feedback for 2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Analysis Overview and Contract Selection - QSO-349-J3611 Proj Contracting/Procurement 21EW3 - So…

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=1126120&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=638690 7/12

10 points

Accurately assesses contract types for their suitability for different types of projects

7.5 points

Assesses contract types for their suitability for different types of projects, but with gaps in accuracy

0 points

Does not assess contract types for their suitability for different types of projects

1/24/2021 Feedback for 2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Analysis Overview and Contract Selection - QSO-349-J3611 Proj Contracting/Procurement 21EW3 - So…

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=1126120&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=638690 8/12

0 / 10

Contract Types: Value and Risk

Criterion Feedback

See comments above.

1/24/2021 Feedback for 2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Analysis Overview and Contract Selection - QSO-349-J3611 Proj Contracting/Procurement 21EW3 - So…

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=1126120&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=638690 9/12

0 / 15

Contract Types: Selection

15 points

Comprehensively assesses contract types for their ability to maximize value and minimize risk for the buyer

11.25 points

Assesses contract types, but with gaps in detail

0 points

Does not assess contract types for their ability to maximize value and minimize risk for the buyer

Criterion Feedback

See comments above.

1/24/2021 Feedback for 2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Analysis Overview and Contract Selection - QSO-349-J3611 Proj Contracting/Procurement 21EW3 - So…

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=1126120&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=638690 10/12

11.25 / 15

Articulation of Response

15 points

Selects the most appropriate contract type(s) for procurement plan in case study, and justifies rationale with research

11.25 points

Selects contract type(s) for procurement plan in case study, but contract type(s) are not appropriate, or does not justify rationale with research

0 points

Does not select contract type(s) for procurement plan in case study

Criterion Feedback

So I think you mean fixed price here, but I'm not sure, and I'd like more input on how that specifically relates to the Harley Davidson case study.

1/24/2021 Feedback for 2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Analysis Overview and Contract Selection - QSO-349-J3611 Proj Contracting/Procurement 21EW3 - So…

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=1126120&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=638690 11/12

Total 57.5 / 100

Overall Score

10 / 10

10 points

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

7.5 points

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

0 points

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

1/24/2021 Feedback for 2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Analysis Overview and Contract Selection - QSO-349-J3611 Proj Contracting/Procurement 21EW3 - So…

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback.d2l?db=1126120&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=638690 12/12

Score

57.5 / 100 - F

Feedback Date

Jan 23, 2021 9:52 PM

Assignment

2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Analysis Overview and Contract Selection

Proficient 76 points minimum

Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.

Needs Improvement 1 point minimum

Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.

Not Evident 0 points minimum

Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.

Submission ID Submission(s) Turnitin® Similarity Date Submitted 15747197 PROJECT

17 % Jan 18, 2021 9:49 AM