|
Criteria
(Weight)
|
Does Not Meet Requirements (0%)
|
Not Fully Developed (50%)
|
Adequate
(70%)
|
Thorough
(90%)
|
Professional (100%)
|
|
Overview of Character
10%
|
Content is incomplete
There is minimal information on the background of the character.
Biographical information is non-existent or very unclear
|
Biographical information is included, however lacks detail.
Few categories are discussed or incorporated.
|
Biological information is included and clearly stated.
Biographical information discusses character’s life in some areas but lacks detail such as life history.
|
Biological information is clearly stated and accurate.
There is some diversity in the areas of the character's life that are discussed.
|
All relevant biographical information is clearly stated and accurate.
Biographical information discusses a wide range of areas of the character's life including family, education, social support, financial status, and anything else that seems pertinent to that character's life history.
|
|
Application of Personality Theories
30%
|
The application of personality theories is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
|
Provides examples of how personality theory affects the personality and behavior of individuals; however, does not provide analysis of each theory and reasons for application.
|
Provides reasonable analysis and detailed information of each of the two personality theories.
|
Application and analysis of personality theories is detailed and organized.
Paper provides rational for theories by providing examples of behavior and personality.
|
Evaluates thoroughly and comprehensively two theories of personality.
Analysis of each theory and rationale for the application is detailed and well organized.
|
|
Strengths & Weakness
20%
|
Paper does not address theoretical approaches strengths & weaknesses.
Few to no examples from the movie/show/book, etc. are included.
|
Analysis attempts to discuss strengths and weaknesses of theory, but lacks detail, focus, and organization. Little to no examples were used to support analysis.
|
Analysis of strengths & weaknesses in each theoretical approach is good, but lacks some clarity and support by too few examples of the character to support analysis.
|
Provides a strong analysis of strengths & weaknesses in each theoretical approach by providing examples of the character to support analysis.
|
Provides a well thought-out and detailed analysis of strengths & weaknesses in each theoretical approach by providing detailed and ample examples of the character to support analysis
|
|
Support with Research
20%
|
Nothing submitted.
|
Inconsistently utilizes sources and/or evidence in the writing. Such sources/evidence may also be unrelated, offering no support to the ideas in the writing.
|
Demonstrates somewhat inconsistent use of sources and/or evidence that are mostly reliable to the discipline and genre of the writing. Sources offer very little support to the ideas in the writing.
|
Demonstrates mostly consistent use of reliable sources and/or evidence that are appropriate to the course. Sources offer some support to the ideas in the writing.
|
Demonstrates consistent use of reliable, appropriate sources and/or evidence to support ideas relevant to this paper.
|
|
APA Formatting & Citations
10%
|
Many (or lacking) APA formatting rules with no references or citations.
|
Many errors in proper use of APA formatting
|
Several errors in proper use of APA formatting
|
1-2 errors in proper use of APA formatting & citations
|
Proper use of APA formatting and included citations. (Title page, headings, reference page is formatted incorrectly)
|
|
Mechanics, Grammar, Spelling
10%
|
No Submission
|
Many grammar errors are present, or narrative is not clear or does not flow in a logical manner.
|
Several grammar errors are present and/or narrative has some major issues with logical progression or clarity.
|
Few grammar errors are present and/or narrative has some minor issues with logical progression or clarity.
|
Appropriate narrative that is logical and has clarity, with minimal to no spelling or grammar errors.
|