help with assgn speech part 2 due in 24 hours

PublicSpeakingWrittenAssignment2.docx

Home >Education homework help >help with assgn speech part 2 due in 24 hours

Public Speaking Written Assignment 2: Written Speech

Assignment Instructions:

*** Be sure to review the Writing Assignment Guidelines/Resources page located before the Written Assignment #1 page.***

Public Speaking Written Assignment 2: Written Speech

Directions:

You will now use the Speech Outline you completed in Assignment #1 to write out your speech in essay form for this Assignment #2.

Essay Length: 2-4 pages

Sources: minimum of 2 websites required

Watch the video below for instructions on how to submit your paper:

Play media comment.

Plagiarism Warning: All essays are submitted to a variety of plagiarism software programs to check for copied material. Copying parts or all of other people's written work and passing it off as yours is a violation of the school's Academic Integrity Policy, which could lead to expulsion.

Writing assignments will be graded using the rubric below.

*** A grade of at least 12 out of 20 (60% or higher) is a requirement to complete the assignment and complete the course. A grade of 11 indicates a student must revise and resubmit within 10 days. Upon resubmission, the instructor will reevaluate the paper and assign the appropriate grade. ***

Rubric

Excel General Rubric_2020

Excel General Rubric_2020

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

main idea and supporting details address the writing prompt

5 pts

Exemplary

Exceptionally clear, focused, engaging with relevant, strong supporting details

4 pts

Proficient

Evident main idea with support which may be general or limited

3 pts

Developing

Main idea may be cloudy because supporting details are too general or lack support of topic

2 pts

Needs Improvement

Purpose and main idea are unclear, irrelevant details

1 pts

Unsatisfactory

Lacks apparent main idea; development is minimal or non-existent

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

structure, introduction, body, conclusion

5 pts

Exemplary

Effectively organized in logical manner; creative and engaging intro, body and conclusion

4 pts

Proficient

Organization is appropriate; evident attempt of clear intro, body and conclusion

3 pts

Developing

Organization is fair; may be a “list” of events; intro, body and/or conclusion not fully developed

2 pts

Needs Improvement

Lack of structure; disorganized and hard to follow; missing or weak intro, body and/or conclusion

1 pts

Unsatisfactory

Lack of coherence; confusing; no identifiable introduction or conclusion

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVoice/Word Choice/Fluency

sentence variety, grammar, spelling, punctuation

5 pts

Exemplary

Expressive and engaging, carefully chosen words, complex and varied sentences, exceptional control of standard conventions of writing

4 pts

Proficient

Functional language with broad range of words, good sentence structure with variety, strong control of conventions, errors are minor

3 pts

Developing

Sentence variety is evident but awkward, monotonous and choppy structure, control of most writing conventions

2 pts

Needs Improvement

Limited sentence variety, limited control of conventions with frequent errors

1 pts

Unsatisfactory

Lacks sentence variety and structure, difficult to follow, confusing at times, grammar errors are distracting

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format

three main components must be included: title page, in-text citations, reference page

5 pts

Exemplary

The three components are error free, ample mix of quotations and paraphrasing implemented with in-text citations

4 pts

Proficient

Minimal errors in the three components and in-text citations are provided throughout the essay

3 pts

Developing

Formatting errors apparent in the three components and/or paper lacks sufficient in-text citations

2 pts

Needs Improvement

The three components are attempted but incorrectly formatted and/or paper needs additional in-text citations

1 pts

Unsatisfactory

One or more of the three components is missing, in-text citations are not implemented (automatic resubmission required indicated by a score of 11)

5 pts

Total Points: 20