Amrica government event paper(in san francisco)(11.15-11.25event)
Fall 2017 American Government Professor Sweeney
Public Event Paper Due Monday, November 13th
Assignment Overview:
The public event paper assignment requires you to go beyond your typical role as a student and step out as an ‘active citizen’ in the public realm. You will attend a ‘public meeting’ of an elected body or a political action/activity and write a 4-5-page response paper about the meeting/activity that you attended. Your paper should be proofread, have a title, be double spaced and written in your own words. Papers must be turned in during class in hard copy format. Late papers will lose half a letter grade for each class meeting late. Papers found to be plagiarized in part or in full will receive a grade of zero.
Instructions:
Attend a ‘public meeting’ of an elected body or a political action/activity. Address the following in your paper:
a. Descriptive evaluation: Describe the meeting/activity that you attended. What did you see and hear? Did you participate? If yes, what did you do or say?
b. Personal reflection: What was your reaction to the meeting/activity? How did the event apply to you?
c. Analytical evaluation: Evaluate whether the meeting/activity that you attended exemplified ‘good governance.’? Why or why not? In other words, did the manner in which the event was conducted exemplify democratic values? Also consider in your evaluation whether or not your event supported or subverted American democracy.
There are many definitions of good governance and debate over what it entails. Overall, this concept relates to how public affairs are conducted. Good governance is characterized by participation, transparency, accountability, rule of law, effectiveness, and equity.
(Note – Your evaluation regarding the question of good governance should be the heart of your paper. Make sure to include a summary of your evaluation in the first paragraph of the paper - your thesis - and develop your evaluation in the body of the paper.)
d. Scan and include a copy of handouts of the meeting/ event if possible (e.g. agenda)
e. Attach the essay rubric to your paper
Appropriate meetings include........city council meetings, county commission meetings, state legislature meetings, public school board meetings, any court hearing, police ride along, any meeting that serves the function of “governance,” any political action in which you are you are participating
Fall 2017 American Government Professor Sweeney
Note: This rubric will be used to assess your paper. Please review thoroughly prior to writing the paper.
|
Grade |
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORGANIZATION |
Essay is easy to read due to clear |
Essay is organized with |
A better method of |
Essay shows no method |
|
|
organization. Main argument is |
main argument stated early |
organization is necessary. |
of organization. Very |
|
10 points |
clearly stated in first paragraph with |
in the paper. Substantiating |
Essay may lack |
difficult to read. |
|
|
substantiating points organized in |
points are less clearly |
introduction, body and |
|
|
|
body paragraphs. Essay has a robust |
organized. Essay has a |
conclusion paragraphs. |
|
|
|
conclusion paragraph. |
conclusion paragraph. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOGIC & |
Essay is based on a clear, well |
Essay is based on a clear |
Essay is based on a thesis |
Essay does not possess |
|
REASONING |
defined thesis. For this assignment, |
thesis (evaluation regarding |
that is vague or irrelevant. |
a discernable thesis. No |
|
|
your thesis will be your evaluation as |
governance) that is well |
Essay does not explicitly |
explanation or |
|
|
to whether the event you attended |
developed. Ideas are |
address the question of |
interpretation. Writer's |
|
|
was good governance (and why or |
explained and developed. |
governance. Some |
viewpoint is unclear. |
|
|
why not?) Thesis is original and goes |
Shows a solid |
evidence cited but not |
Little or no |
|
20 points |
beyond the ideas in class. Essay |
understanding of the text, |
explained nor connected to |
development. Vaguest |
|
|
shows a strong development of ideas |
ideas and the assignment. |
the thesis. Relies on |
generalizations and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and command of the conceptual and |
Some originality of thought; |
summarizing. Shallow |
misinformation. |
|
|
interpretive tasks of the assignment. |
evidence explained and |
analysis. Ideas are obvious |
|
|
|
Clear original interpretation of |
interpreted. |
from the reading. |
|
|
|
evidence; independent thinking; fresh |
|
|
|
|
|
ideas. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTENT |
The essay includes detailed |
Description and explanation |
Some information is |
Little or no specific |
|
|
description of the event and well |
of thesis is less detailed, |
missing. Some errors of |
discussion related to the |
|
15 points |
developed discussion that supports |
specific and developed; |
fact, but shows an overall |
assignment. Unrelated, |
|
|
your thesis. Writing is specific and |
Title clearly signifies your |
understanding of the |
unclear title or no title |
|
|
concrete. Introduction and |
interpretation |
assignment. Discussion in |
|
|
|
conclusion are interesting and |
|
essay is not enough support |
|
|
|
balanced. Title is original and |
|
for thesis. Title copied from |
|
|
|
conveys interpretation. |
|
sources or assignment |
|
|
|
|
|
sheet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STYLE & |
Essay exhibits correct spelling. |
Essay contains a good |
Essay contains a tendency |
Major grammatical |
|
MECHANICS |
Sophisticated sentences, chooses |
command of English with |
toward wordiness, unclear |
problems; Incomplete |
|
10 points |
words aptly, and observes all the |
occasional stylistic or |
or awkward sentences, |
sentences and |
|
|
conventions of English grammar. |
grammar problems. |
imprecise use of words and |
confusing or unclear |
|
|
|
|
grammatical errors. |
writing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OVERALL |
The paper demonstrates well the |
The paper helps to |
The paper does little to |
The paper does not |
|
IMPACT |
student’s skills, abilities, and |
demonstrate the student’s |
demonstrate the student’s |
demonstrate the |
|
5 points |
knowledge. Above average in |
skills, abilities. Meets |
skills, abilities, and |
student’s skills, abilities, |
|
|
meeting or exceeds College level |
College level expectation of |
knowledge. Not really |
and knowledge. Not |
|
|
expectation of quality and effort. |
quality and effort. |
sufficient college level |
sufficient college level |
|
|
|
|
quality. |
quality. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL POINTS |
____________/ 60________ |
|
|
|
Source: Rand Jimerson, WWU and University of California, Irvine, Humanities Core Pro