Developmental Psychology

BA Psychology Presentation Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Development

50.0 pts

Fair = 30 – 21 Points/Percent The presentation is two (2) slides slide short of the required slides required for the presentation. An appropriate topic, purpose, and form are employed, but it is not fully developed. At least 2 reasons in support of the topic with 1 example for each are used in the presentation. Convincing, content related graphics are inconsistent in the presentation. Parts of the conclusion do not follow the assignment’s directions. Subject knowledge and organization needs improvement, and more than one key point for the topic are missing.

50.0 pts

Good = 40 – 31 Points/Percent The presentation is one (1) slide short of the required slides required for the presentation. An appropriate topic, purpose, and form are employed. At least 3 reasons in support of the topic with 2 examples for each are used in the presentation. Convincing, content related graphics and a strong conclusion are used according to the assignment’s directions Subject knowledge and organization is good, but one key point for the topic is missing.

50.0 pts

Superior = 50 – 41 Points/Percent The number of required slides is used in the presentation. An appropriate topic, purpose, and form are employed. At least 3 reasons in support of the topic with 2 examples for each are used in the presentation. Convincing, content related graphics and a strong conclusion are used according to the assignment’s directions. Subject knowledge and organization is excellent.

20.0 pts

Poor = 20 Points/Percent or Below The presentation is three (3) or more slides slide short of the required slides required for the presentation. An inappropriate topic, purpose, and form are used for the presentation. The student does not present reasons in support of the topic. Graphics are not used in the presentation. If they are, they are not convincing or content related. The presentation has a weak or missing conclusion. Subject knowledge and organization is not evident, and several key points for the topic are missing.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence/Scholarship

20.0 pts

Superior 20 - 13 Points/Percent Presentation provides dramatic and compelling evidence in support of the topic. Interesting, detailed presentation notes that further educate the audience on the topic. Sites all outside sources. Credits all information/ images from outside sources using superscript on the slides and APA format in the notes section.

12.0 pts

Good 12 - 5 Points/Percent Presentation provides a few (three (3) or more) key concepts and evidence in support of the topic. Interesting, detailed presentation notes that further educate the audience on the topic. Sites all outside sources. Credits all information/ images from outside sources using superscript on the slides and APA format in the notes section.

7.0 pts

Fair 5 - 1 Points/Percent Presentation provides one (1) or two (2) key concepts and evidence in support of the topic. Uninteresting, vague notes that would not help educate most audiences on the topic. Sites some outside sources. Clearly uses information/images that does not belong to them and inconsistently credits the owner of the information/images.

0.0 pts

Poor = 0 Points/Percent Presentation does not provide key concepts and evidence to support the topic. No speaker notes to further educate the audience. Does not site outside sources. Clearly uses information/images that from outside sources and does not credit the owner/creator/author of the information/images. IMPORTANT NOTE: Plagiarism by using other text and images without proper citation will result in a ZERO/”F” for the assignment.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization/Structure

10.0 pts

Superior = 10 – 8 Points/Percent Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. Content is logically organized.

7.0 pts

Good 7 – 5 Points/Percent Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed because one (1) to two (2) slides should be placed elsewhere in the presentation.

4.0 pts

Fair 4 – 3 Points/Percent Content is logically organized for the most part. Three (3) slides should be rearranged and placed elsewhere in the presentation.

2.0 pts

Poor 2 – 0 Points/Percent No clear or logical organizational structure. Four (4) or more slides should be rearranged and placed elsewhere in the presentation.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics/Grammar (10 Points)

10.0 pts

Superior = 10 Points/Percent No mechanical errors

9.0 pts

Good = 9 – 8 Points/Percent 1 – 4 mechanical errors

7.0 pts

Fair = 7 – 5 Points/Percent 5 – 8 mechanical errors

4.0 pts

Poor = 4 and Below Points/Percent 9 or more mechanical errors

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReadability/Style

10.0 pts

Superior = 10 – 8 Points/Percent Presentation makes excellent use of font, alignment, color, graphics, and animation/effects to enhance the presentation. Uses high level information for all bulleted lists on the slide. Keeps all detailed information in speaker notes. Bullet sentence structure is 100% consistent.

7.0 pts

Good 7 – 5 Points/Percent Presentation makes good use of font, alignment, color, graphics, and animation/effects to enhance the presentation. Uses high level information for most bulleted lists on the slide. Keeps most detailed information in speaker notes. Bullet sentence structure is mostly consistent.

4.0 pts

Fair 4 – 3 Points/Percent Presentation makes use of font, alignment, color, graphics, and animation/effects, but occasionally these take away from the presentation content. Images are stretched out of shape and pixelated. Bulleted lists are not aligned. Bullets are not sequenced properly. Large amounts of text are used on bullet points on the slides and not placed in the notes section of the presentation.

0.0 pts

Poor 2 – 0 Points/Percent Presentation’s use of font, alignment, color, graphics, animation/effects often distract from the presentation content. Images are stretched out of shape and pixelated. Bulleted lists are not aligned. Bullets are not sequenced properly. Large amounts of text are used on bullet points on the slides and not placed in the notes section of the presentation.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0