Graduate Level Psychology Ethics Help

profiledestynska
PSYCH660_v3_Case_Study_Four_Worksheet.docx

Title

ABC/123 Version X

1

Case Study Four Worksheet

PSYCH/660 Version 3

1

University of Phoenix Material

Case Study Four Worksheet

Respond to the following questions in 1,500 to 1,750 words.

1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma?

1. Does this situation meet the standards set by the duty to protect statue? How might whether or not Dr. Yeung’s state includes researchers under such a statute influence Dr. Yeung’s ethical decision making? How might the fact that Dr. Yeung is a research psychologist without training or licensure in clinical practice influence the ethical decision?

1. How are APA Ethical Standards 2.01a b, and c; 2.04; 3.04; 3.06; 4.01; 4.02; and 10.10a relevant to this case? Which other standards might apply?

1. What are Dr. Yeung’s ethical alternatives for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principle and enforceable standard, as well as legal standards and Dr. Yeung’s obligations to stakeholders?

1. What steps should Dr. Yeung take to ethically implement her decision and monitor its effects?

Reference

Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Copyright © XXXX by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2018 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Case Study

Four

Worksheet

PSYCH/660

Version

3

1

Copyright ©

201

8

by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

University of Phoenix Material

Case Study

Four

Worksheet

Respond to the following questions in

1,500 to 1,75

0 words.

1.

Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA

Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the

dilemma?

2.

Does this situation meet the

standards set by the duty to protect statue? How might whether or

not Dr. Yeung’s state includes researchers under such a statute influence Dr. Yeung’s ethical

decision making? How might the fact that Dr. Yeung is a research psychologist without training o

r

licensure in clinical practice influence the ethical decision?

3.

How are APA Ethical Standards 2.01a b, and c; 2.04; 3.04; 3.06; 4.01; 4.02; and 10.10a relevant

to this case? Which other standards might apply?

4.

What are Dr.

Yeung’s

ethical altern

ative

s

for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best

reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principle and enforceable standard,

as well as

legal

standards and Dr.

Yeung’s

obligations to stakeholders?

5.

What steps should Dr.

Yeung

take to ethically

implement her decision and monitor its effects?

Reference

Fisher, C. B. (2013).

Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists

. Thousand Oaks,

CA

:

Sage.

Case Study Four Worksheet

PSYCH/660 Version 3

1

Copyright © 2018 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

University of Phoenix Material

Case Study Four Worksheet

Respond to the following questions in 1,500 to 1,750 words.

1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the

dilemma?

2. Does this situation meet the standards set by the duty to protect statue? How might whether or

not Dr. Yeung’s state includes researchers under such a statute influence Dr. Yeung’s ethical

decision making? How might the fact that Dr. Yeung is a research psychologist without training or

licensure in clinical practice influence the ethical decision?

3. How are APA Ethical Standards 2.01a b, and c; 2.04; 3.04; 3.06; 4.01; 4.02; and 10.10a relevant

to this case? Which other standards might apply?

4. What are Dr. Yeung’s ethical alternatives for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best

reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principle and enforceable standard, as well as legal

standards and Dr. Yeung’s obligations to stakeholders?

5. What steps should Dr. Yeung take to ethically implement her decision and monitor its effects?

Reference

Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA:

Sage.