Research Paper Analysis

PSYC3320 (A11) Research Paper Analysis – Rubric

Pg. 1 of 2

Question 0 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt

1 Incorrect or absent Presents a reasonable new title that is declarative (i.e., states the results of the study)

+ Rationale is based on specific findings from the study. Demonstrates some improvement in title.

--- ---

2 Limited description of methods used. Demonstrates minimal understanding of methodology. Writing difficult to understand, lacking organization, and/or excessively technical.

Minor inaccuracies in description of methodology. Evidence of some gaps in understanding of the methodology. Writing is limited by disorganization, excessively technical style and/or jargon.

Describes all aspects of methodology are described. Demonstrates thorough understanding of the paradigm, timeline, etc. Writing is clear and relatable.

--- ---

3 Incorrect or absent Limited description of figure. Demonstrates minimal understanding of result(s). Writing difficult to understand, lacking organization and/or excessively technical.

Missing description of x-axis, y-axis, main result, and/or take- home message. Shows moderate understanding of the result(s). Language lacks clarity or is too technical.

Missing description of x-axis, y-axis, main result, or take- home message. Evidence of some gaps in understanding of the result. Writing shows minor issues with clarity and/or accessibility.

Defines x and y axis. Describes main result clearly and succinctly. “Take-home message” captures the essence of the finding. Writing is clear and appropriate for lay audience.

4 Incorrect or absent Selects an appropriate main finding. Alternative explanation is implausible, inadequately considered, and/or not scientifically-based.

Selects an appropriate main finding. Alternative explanation is plausible, well- considered, and rooted in science.

--- ---

PSYC3320 (A11) Research Paper Analysis – Rubric

Pg. 2 of 2

5 Incorrect or absent Selects an appropriate main finding. Makes a vague or superficial connection to course material. Shows limited understanding of both the paper and related course material.

Selects an appropriate main finding. Makes a thoughtful, well- reasoned connection to course material. Shows strong understanding of both the paper and related course materials.

--- ---

6 Incorrect or absent. Implications are implausible, generic, and/or do not follow from the results.

Demonstrates clear understanding of the overall significance of the findings. Well-considered real-world application or explanation of everyday phenomenon. Strong connection to study results.

Well-considered real- world application or explanation of everyday phenomenon. Strong connection to study results. Demonstrates clear understanding of the overall significance of the findings.

--- ---