1 page 7 hours only...$5 bid only if you can manage

PSY 614 Leadership Journal Guidelines and Rubric Overview: Journal assignments ask you to reflect upon the topics discussed in the course to develop a personal leadership conceptual framework that ultimately

incorporates your strengths and weaknesses, value system, professional goals, and responsibilities to the organization and larger community. Your journal

assignments will demonstrate your evolution in thinking and personal viewpoint throughout the course. Approach these activities as (a) an opportunity to reflect

upon and apply what you learn each week based on the assigned readings, discussions, and activities, and (b) an opportunity to share your knowledge and

expertise based on your educational and professional experiences in the past. As a successful professional, you will need good reflective and writing skills.

Journal assignments offer you the opportunity to further develop these skills. Journals are private between the student and the instructor.

Note: In Module Ten, you will summarize what you have learned from your individual journal assignments. You will self-critique your assignments and submit a

three- to five-page paper that captures your conclusions. This will be your final leadership framework.

Guidelines for Submission: Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. All citations

should be completed using APA format. Research is needed to substantiate claims.

Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value

Responses

Meets “Proficient” criteria and substantiates thinking with clear and relevant personal examples and independent research (36-40)

Journal post includes an adequate response to the assignment prompt (32-35)

Does not sufficiently respond to assignment prompt (28-31)

Does not respond to assignment prompt (0-27)

40

Integration and Application

Meets “Proficient” criteria and substantiates thinking with clear and relevant examples from module content (36-40)

Journal post demonstrates good depth of knowledge of the module content (32-35)

Does not sufficiently demonstrate depth of knowledge of the module content (28-31)

Does not demonstrate knowledge of the module content (0-27)

40

Articulation of

Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is presented in a professional and easy-to- read format (18-20)

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax (16-17)

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (14-15)

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas (0-13)

20

Earned Total: Comments

100%