case study

PSY 570 Final Project Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric Prompt: For Milestone Two, produce a document containing the rough outline using the template provided in your learning environment. You are expected to address the first four elements (title page, case study abstract, detailed case study description, and ethical conflict). Remember that you will use instructor feedback to further revise this milestone, which contains moving pieces of your final project submission. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed within the final project outline template:

1. Working title: Include a working title for the case study analysis (you are encouraged to flex your creative muscle). 2. Case Study Analysis Abstract: Include a preliminary draft of your abstract of your case study analysis, outlining both the case study vignette and your

approach to analyzing the case study. 3. Detailed Case Study Analysis Description: Summarize the chosen scenario, the important people, and the important interactions present in your chosen

case study. 4. The Ethical Conflict: Examine the central ethical conflict of the case study and assess interactions between different roles in the scenario.

Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and any referenced sources cited in APA format.

Rubric

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Working Title Meets “Proficient” criteria and working title demonstrates creativity

Includes a working title for the case study analysis

Includes a working title for the case study analysis, but working title is not in alignment with the case study

Does not include a working title for the case study analysis

10

Case Study Analysis Abstract

Meets “Proficient” criteria and abstract is the appropriate length

Includes a draft of the case study analysis abstract that describes both the case study vignette and the approach to analyzing the case study

Includes a draft of the case study analysis abstract but does not describe both case study vignette and approach to analyzing case study

Does not include a case study analysis abstract

20

Detailed Case Study Analysis Description

Meets “Proficient” criteria and explains approach to analyzing case study

Summarizes the chosen scenario, the important people, and the important interactions present in the case study

Summarizes the chosen scenario, the important people, and the important interactions present in the case study, but is lacking in detail or breadth

Does not summarize the chosen scenario, the important people, and the important interactions present in the case study

30

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

The Ethical Conflict Meets “Proficient” criteria and identifies a strategy for resolving the central ethical conflict

Examines central ethical conflict of case study and assesses interactions between different roles in the scenario

Examines central ethical conflict of case study and assesses interactions between different roles in the scenario, but assessment lacks depth or detail

Does not examine central ethical conflict of case study or assess interaction between different roles in the scenario

30

APA Writing No errors related to APA style or citations

Few errors related to related to APA style and citations

Major errors related to APA style and citations

Critical errors related to APA style and citations

5

Articulation of Response

Submission is free of errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format with language that is appropriate to the intended audience

Submission has no major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, organization or audience- appropriate terminology

Submission has major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, organization, or audience-appropriate language that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, organization, or audience-specific language that prevent understanding of ideas

5

Total 100%