PSY 5-3
Literature Review Guidelines and Rubric
Overview Writing the Literature Review When writing a critical literature review, you will need to summarize, evaluate, and offer critical comments on the ideas and information that the author(s) presents in the literature. Your goal should be to read and understand the literature, analyze the findings or arguments, and evaluate and comment on the literature. Please note that unlike the Annotated Bibliography, in which you listed the sources you are planning to use, your Literature Review must be a written paper that incorporates your responses to the questions below. For additional information on writing a Literature Review, you may review the following article: How to Write a Literature Review Reading the Literature
Allow enough time to understand it.
Read the literature without taking notes to gain an overall impression of its main idea.
Read the literature again, analytically highlighting important ideas and making brief notes of main ideas and the main topic. Ask yourself these questions: Be sure to address the following issues within your literature review:
Name of article and journal cited in proper APA format
Where did you find this article? How did you know that it was a reliable and valid site?
What is the issue that the article is specifically addressing? Is this a significant problem or issue related to the concepts and theory in this course? Why or why not?
What references did the author use in this article?
Did the article contain research? What data was used? What instruments, if any, were used to collect data?
What were some of the conclusions, if any, to the research in this article?
Was the article reliable and valid? Explain.
Was this article well written? Thoughtful and reflective? Applicable for the classroom teacher?
What were the limitations in this article? Any variables?
Any other thoughts, comments? Guidelines for Submission: Your Literature Review should be at least two pages (four pages maximum), double-spaced, use 12-point Times New Roman font, and contain citations in APA format.
Rubric
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Background
Provides a comprehensive overview of research/data and instruments used in article
Provides explanation of research/data and instruments used in article
Some explanation of research/data and instruments used in article
Fails to provide explanation of research/data and instruments used in article
20
Main Elements Current issue or Problem
addressed in article
The project includes all of the main elements and requirements
The paper includes most of the main elements and requirements
The paper includes some of the main elements and requirements
The paper lacks presentation of the main elements and requirements
20
Critique of Article Citing Both Strengths
and Limitations
Well-developed critique citing both strengths and weaknesses of the article
Developed critique citing both strengths and weaknesses of the article
Some development citing strengths and weaknesses of the article
Some development but incomplete critique of the article
20
Mechanics
No errors related to organization, grammar, and style
Minor errors related to organization, grammar, and style
Some errors related to organization, grammar, and style
Major errors related to organization, grammar, and style
10
Proper Citation
All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented in discipline-appropriate format
All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but many are not in discipline-appropriate format
Some sources are not accurately documented in discipline-appropriate format
None of the sources are accurately documented in discipline-appropriate format
10
Application of Theory, Reference Data, and
Course Concepts
Incorporates concepts and theory from course material and outside references
Applies theory, reference data, and course concepts
Incorporates some theory and course concepts
Fails to apply theory or course concepts
20
Total 100%