Addiction POWERPOINT URGENT

PSY 200 Prevention Program Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric In a presentation, identify the population and addiction that you will be addressing with the prevention program you will create for the final project. Possible addictions (this is not an all-inclusive list):

 Alcohol

 Drugs

 Internet  Gambling

 Tobacco

Possible populations (this is not an all -inclusive list):

 Adult  Senior

 Youth

 Adolescent  Workplace

 Church member

 LGBT

Possible population and prevention programs:

 Seniors who have been diagnosed with macular degeneration who are experiencing increased depression and isolation

 Youths who are not a part of the community and neighborhood functions due to playing video games  Employees using stimulants in the workplace to meet deadlines due to decreased personnel but increased production demands

The presentation should include 3–4 slides (not counting title slide and references slide) with speaker notes to address the following topics:

 Population that you are using and why this population is at risk for this addiction  Addiction that you are using and the history of this addiction and its impact on society

 Current impact on the population, family, workplace, and community from this addiction

An effective presentation will include:

 Dynamic formatting of the slides

 Appropriate images, charts, graphs, and so on

 Clean bullets points that do not give too much information per slide  Use of the speaker notes section to clearly define the bullets of the slide and provide reference to cited material

View this example prevention program. Guidelines for Submission: The presentation should be a PowerPoint presentation to include 3–4 slides (not counting title slide and references slide) with speaker notes. All citations should be in APA format.

Prevention Program Milestone One Rubric

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Identify the

Population

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and

us es s peci fi c, rel evant exampl es as to why thi s popul ati on i s at ri s k

Identi fi es the at-ri s k popul ati on

that wi l l be the focus of the preventi on program and di s cus ses why they are at ri s k

Identi fi es the at-ri s k popul ati on,

but l acks a menti on of why they are at ri s k

Does not i denti fy the at-ri s k

popul ati on

25

Addiction: Identification

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and uti l i zes s peci fic and rel evant

exampl es on how the addi cti on rel ates to the at-ri s k popul ati on

Identi fi es the addi cti on that wi l l be the focus of the preventi on

program and rel ates i t to the at- ri s k popul ati on

Identi fi es the addi cti on, but there are gaps i n how thi s

addi cti on rel ates to the at-ri s k popul ati on

Does not i denti fy the addi cti on 25

Addiction: Impact

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and us es s peci fi c and rel evant exampl es to s ubs tanti ate the

addi cti on’s i mpact on the at-ri s k popul ati on

Anal yzes pos s i bl e i mpacts of the addi cti on on the at-ri s k popul ati on. Supports thi s

anal ys is wi th one peer-revi ewed arti cl e

Anal ys i s contains gaps between the addi cti on and how i t i mpacts the at-ri s k popul ati on OR does

not s upport anal ys is wi th a peer - revi ewed arti cl e

Does not anal yze the i mpacts of the addi cti on on the at-ri s k popul ati on

20

Addiction: History

Meets “Profi ci ent” cri teri a and us es s peci fi c and rel evant exampl es to rel ate the addi cti on

to the at-ri s k popul ati on

Di s cus s es the hi s tory of the addi cti on and how i t rel ates to the at-ri s k popul ati on

Di s cus s es the hi s tory of the addi cti on, but l acks a di s cuss ion of how i t rel ates to the at-ri s k

popul ati on, OR di s cus ses how the addi cti on rel ates to the at- ri s k popul ati on, but does not

provi de a hi s tory of the addi cti on

Does not provi de a hi s tory of the addi cti on

25

Articulation of Response

Submi s s i on i s free of errors rel ated to, grammar, s pel l i ng,

and s yntax

Submi s s i on has no major errors rel ated to grammar, s pel l i ng,

s yntax, or organi zati on

Submi s s i on has major errors rel ated to grammar, s pel l i ng,

s yntax, or organi zati on that negati vel y i mpact readabi l ity and arti cul ati on of mai n i deas

Submi s s i on has criti cal errors rel ated to grammar, s pel l i ng,

s yntax, or organi zati on that prevent unders tandi ng of i deas

5

Total 100%