outline
Abnormal Psychology Research Paper Outline - Rubric
Topic/Proposed Title 4 points
Criteria Description
List the approved topic/proposed title.
5. Target 4 points
The worksheet expertly lists the approved topic/proposed title.
4. Acceptable 3.4 points
The worksheet clearly lists the approved topic/proposed title.
3. Approaching 3 points
The worksheet adequately lists the approved topic/proposed title.
2. Insufficient 2.6 points
The worksheet inadequately lists the approved topic/proposed title.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The worksheet omits or incompletely lists the approved topic/proposed title.
Collapse All
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Introduction 6 points
Criteria Description
Provide an introduction (including proposed hook, background, purpose, and thesis).
5. Target 6 points
The worksheet expertly provides an introduction.
4. Acceptable 5.1 points
The worksheet clearly provides an introduction.
3. Approaching 4.5 points
The worksheet adequately provides an introduction.
2. Insufficient 3.9 points
The worksheet inadequately provides an introduction.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The worksheet omits or incompletely provides an introduction.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Comprehensive Explanation 6 points
Criteria Description
Provide a comprehensive explanation of the selected subject (e.g., clinical definition,
background information).
5. Target 6 points
The worksheet expertly provides a comprehensive explanation of the selected
subject.
4. Acceptable 5.1 points
The worksheet clearly provides a comprehensive explanation of the selected
subject.
3. Approaching 4.5 points
The worksheet adequately provides a comprehensive explanation of the selected
subject.
2. Insufficient 3.9 points
The worksheet inadequately provides a comprehensive explanation of the selected
subject.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The worksheet omits or incompletely provides a comprehensive explanation of the
selected subject.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Societal and/or Cultural Implications 6 points
Criteria Description
Address the societal and/or cultural implications of the chosen subject.
5. Target 6 points
The worksheet expertly addresses the societal and/or cultural implications of the
chosen subject
4. Acceptable 5.1 points
The worksheet clearly addresses the societal and/or cultural implications of the
chosen subject.
3. Approaching 4.5 points
The worksheet adequately addresses the societal and/or cultural implications of the
chosen subject.
2. Insufficient 3.9 points
The worksheet inadequately addresses the societal and/or cultural implications of
the chosen subject.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The worksheet omits or incompletely addresses the societal and/or cultural
implications of the chosen subject.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Models of Abnormality 6 points
Criteria Description
Discuss how the subject is related to one or more models of abnormality.
5. Target 6 points
The worksheet expertly discusses how the subject is related to one or more models
of abnormality.
4. Acceptable 5.1 points
The worksheet clearly discusses how the subject is related to one or more models
of abnormality.
3. Approaching 4.5 points
The worksheet adequately discusses how the subject is related to one or more
models of abnormality.
2. Insufficient 3.9 points
The worksheet inadequately discusses how the subject is related to one or more
models of abnormality.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The worksheet omits or incompletely discusses how the subject is related to one or
more models of abnormality.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Scholarly Articles 4 points
Criteria Description
Support the subtopics with three to six scholarly articles.
5. Target 4 points
The worksheet includes quality, well-researched scholarly sources to support the
assignment.
4. Acceptable 3.4 points
The worksheet includes sound scholarly sources to support the assignment.
3. Approaching 3 points
The worksheet includes adequate scholarly sources to support the assignment.
2. Insufficient 2.6 points
The worksheet includes inadequate scholarly sources to support the assignment.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The worksheet omits a minimum of three to six scholarly sources to support the
assignment.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Conclusion 6 points
Criteria Description
Provide a conclusion (including re-statement of thesis).
5. Target 6 points
The worksheet expertly provides a conclusion.
4. Acceptable 5.1 points
The worksheet clearly provides a conclusion.
3. Approaching 4.5 points
The worksheet adequately provides a conclusion.
2. Insufficient 3.9 points
The worksheet inadequately provides a conclusion.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The worksheet omits or incompletely provides a conclusion.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Mechanics of Writing 2 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 2 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 1.7 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 1.5 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 1.3 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language
choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
Total 40 points
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.