Psychology assignment help

profileRosi_226
PSY-452Rubric-LiteratureReviewSynthesis.pdf

Literature Review Synthesis - Rubric

Purpose and Significance 8 points

Criteria Description

Identify the purpose and significance of the five selected articles.

5. Target 8 points

The worksheet expertly identifies the purpose and significance of the five selected

articles. The worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 6.8 points

The worksheet clearly identifies the purpose and significance of the five selected

articles. The worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the

surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 6 points

The worksheet adequately identifies the purpose and significance of the five

selected articles. The worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 5.2 points

The worksheet inadequately identifies the purpose and significance of the five

selected articles. The worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The worksheet omits or incompletely identifies the purpose and significance of the

five selected articles. The worksheet does not demonstrate understanding of the

topic.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Research Question(s) 8 points

Criteria Description

Identify the research question(s) for the five selected articles.

5. Target 8 points

The worksheet expertly identifies the research question(s) for the five selected

articles. The worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 6.8 points

The worksheet clearly identifies the research question(s) for the five selected

articles. The worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the

surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 6 points

The worksheet adequately identifies the research question(s) for the five selected

articles The worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 5.2 points

The worksheet inadequately identifies the research question(s) for the five selected

articles. The worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The worksheet omits or incompletely identifies the research question(s) for the five

selected articles. The worksheet does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Design and Sample 8 points

Criteria Description

Identify the study design and participants for the five selected articles.

5. Target 8 points

The worksheet expertly identifies the study design and participants for the five

selected articles. The worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the

topic.

4. Acceptable 6.8 points

The worksheet clearly identifies the study design and participants for the five

selected articles. The worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends

beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 6 points

The worksheet adequately identifies the study design and participants for the five

selected articles. The worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 5.2 points

The worksheet inadequately identifies the study design and participants for the five

selected articles. The worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The worksheet omits or incompletely identifies the study design and participants

for the five selected articles. The worksheet does not demonstrate understanding

of the topic.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Method 8 points

Criteria Description

Identify the instrumentation and procedures for the five selected articles.

5. Target 8 points

The worksheet expertly identifies the instrumentation and procedures for the five

selected articles. The worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the

topic.

4. Acceptable 6.8 points

The worksheet clearly identifies the instrumentation and procedures for the five

selected articles. The worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends

beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 6 points

The worksheet adequately identifies the instrumentation and procedures for the

five selected articles. The worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the

topic.

2. Insufficient 5.2 points

The worksheet inadequately identifies the instrumentation and procedures for the

five selected articles. The worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the

topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The worksheet omits or incompletely identifies the instrumentation and procedures

for the five selected articles. The worksheet does not demonstrate understanding

of the topic.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Results 8 points

Criteria Description

Identify the key findings for the five selected articles.

5. Target 8 points

The worksheet expertly identifies the key findings for the five selected articles. The

worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 6.8 points

The worksheet clearly identifies the key findings for the five selected articles. The

worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the

topic.

3. Approaching 6 points

The worksheet adequately identifies the key findings for the five selected articles.

The worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 5.2 points

The worksheet inadequately identifies the key findings for the five selected articles.

The worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The worksheet omits or incompletely identifies the key findings for the five selected

articles. The worksheet does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Design and Limitations 10.4 points

Criteria Description

Explain how the study’s design/limitations support your problem statement (Prove

your research needs to be done).

5. Target 10.4 points

The worksheet expertly explains how the study’s design/limitations support the

student’s problem statement. The worksheet demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 8.84 points

The worksheet clearly explains how the study’s design/limitations support the

student’s problem statement. The worksheet demonstrates an understanding that

extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 7.8 points

The worksheet adequately explains how the study’s design/limitations support the

student’s problem statement. The worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding

of the topic.

2. Insufficient 6.76 points

The worksheet inadequately explains how the study’s design/limitations support

the student’s problem statement. The worksheet demonstrates a poor

understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The worksheet omits or incompletely explains how the study’s design/limitations

support the student’s problem statement. The worksheet does not demonstrate

understanding of the topic.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Variable(s) 10.4 points

Criteria Description

Explain what variable(s) this study has in common with your study.

5. Target 10.4 points

The worksheet expertly explains what variable(s) this study has in common with the

student’s study. The worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the

topic.

4. Acceptable 8.84 points

The worksheet clearly explains what variable(s) this study has in common with the

student’s study. The worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends

beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 7.8 points

The worksheet adequately explains what variable(s) this study has in common with

the student’s study. The worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the

topic.

2. Insufficient 6.76 points

The worksheet inadequately explains what variable(s) this study has in common

with the student’s study. The worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the

topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The worksheet omits or incompletely explains what variable(s) this study has in

common with the student’s study. The worksheet does not demonstrate

understanding of the topic.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Supporting Results 11.2 points

Criteria Description

Explain how the results support your problem statement, research questions, or

hypotheses.

5. Target 11.2 points

The worksheet expertly explains how the results support the student’s problem

statement, research questions, or hypotheses. The worksheet demonstrates an

exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 9.52 points

The worksheet clearly explains how the results support the student’s problem

statement, research questions, or hypotheses. The worksheet demonstrates an

understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 8.4 points

The worksheet adequately explains how the results support the student’s problem

statement, research questions, or hypotheses. The worksheet demonstrates a basic

understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 7.28 points

The worksheet inadequately explains how the results support the student’s

problem statement, research questions, or hypotheses. The worksheet

demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The worksheet omits or incompletely explains how the results support the student’s

problem statement, research questions, or hypotheses. The worksheet does not

demonstrate understanding of the topic.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 4 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 3.4 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 3 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 2.6 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Format/Documentation 4 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 4 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 3.4 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 3 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 2.6 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 80 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.