Psychology assignment 2

profileRosi_226
PSY-402Rubric-UnderstandingNeuralProcessesandPathwaysinSensoryPerception.pdf

Understanding Neural Processes and Pathways in Sensory Perception - Rubric

Neural Pathways of Sensory Systems 21 points

Criteria Description

Shows the audition, vision, and olfaction pathways from the sensory organ to the

respective sensory cortex.

5. Target 21 points

Matrix expertly shows the audition, vision, and olfaction pathways from the sensory

organ to the respective sensory cortex, and section is comprehensive and insightful

with relevant evidence to support claims. Matrix demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 17.85 points

Matrix clearly shows the audition, vision, and olfaction pathways from the sensory

organ to the respective sensory cortex, and section is strong with sound analysis

and some evidence to support claims. Matrix demonstrates an understanding that

extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 15.75 points

Matrix adequately shows the audition, vision, and olfaction pathways from the

sensory organ to the respective sensory cortex, but section is limited and lacks

some evidence to support claims. Matrix demonstrates a basic understanding of

the topic.

2. Insufficient 13.65 points

Matrix inadequately shows the audition, vision, and olfaction pathways from the

sensory organ to the respective sensory cortex, but section is weak and missing

evidence to support claims. Matrix demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Matrix omits or incompletely shows the audition, vision, and olfaction pathways

from the sensory organ to the respective sensory cortex. Matrix does not

demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Object Recognition Process 21 points

Criteria Description

Outlines the cognitive and neural mechanisms that enable object recognition and

identifies both dorsal and ventral pathways of visual perception as it relates to object

recognition.

5. Target 21 points

Matrix expertly outlines the cognitive and neural mechanisms that enable object

recognition and identifies both dorsal and ventral pathways of visual perception as

it relates to object recognition, and section is comprehensive and insightful with

relevant evidence to support claims. Matrix demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 17.85 points

Matrix clearly outlines the cognitive and neural mechanisms that enable object

recognition and identifies both dorsal and ventral pathways of visual perception as

it relates to object recognition, and section is strong with sound analysis and some

evidence to support claims. Matrix demonstrates an understanding that extends

beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 15.75 points

Matrix adequately outlines the cognitive and neural mechanisms that enable object

recognition and identifies both dorsal and ventral pathways of visual perception as

it relates to object recognition, but section is limited and lacks some evidence to

support claims. Matrix demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 13.65 points

Matrix inadequately outlines the cognitive and neural mechanisms that enable

object recognition and identifies both dorsal and ventral pathways of visual

perception as it relates to object recognition, but section is weak and missing

evidence to support claims. Matrix demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Matrix omits or incompletely outlines the cognitive and neural mechanisms that

enable object recognition and identifies both dorsal and ventral pathways of visual

perception as it relates to object recognition. Matrix does not demonstrate

understanding of the topic.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Neurological Di�erences and Their E�ects 14 points

Criteria Description

Describes the neurological cause or the affected area of the brain, how the condition

affects visual perception or object recognition, and potential challenges individuals

with these conditions may face in their daily lives for each provided condition.

5. Target 14 points

Matrix expertly describes the neurological cause or the affected area of the brain,

how the condition affects visual perception or object recognition, and potential

challenges individuals with these conditions may face in their daily lives for each

provided condition, and section is comprehensive and insightful with relevant

evidence to support claims. Matrix demonstrates an exceptional understanding of

the topic.

4. Acceptable 11.9 points

Matrix clearly describes the neurological cause or the affected area of the brain,

how the condition affects visual perception or object recognition, and potential

challenges individuals with these conditions may face in their daily lives for each

provided condition, and section is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to

support claims. Matrix demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the

surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 10.5 points

Matrix adequately describes the neurological cause or the affected area of the

brain, how the condition affects visual perception or object recognition, and

potential challenges individuals with these conditions may face in their daily lives

for each provided condition, but section is limited and lacks some evidence to

support claims. Matrix demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 9.1 points

Matrix inadequately describes the neurological cause or the affected area of the

brain, how the condition affects visual perception or object recognition, and

potential challenges individuals with these conditions may face in their daily lives

for each provided condition, but section is weak and missing evidence to support

claims. Matrix demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Matrix omits or incompletely describes the neurological cause or the affected area

of the brain, how the condition affects visual perception or object recognition, and

potential challenges individuals with these conditions may face in their daily lives

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

for each provided condition. Matrix does not demonstrate understanding of the

topic.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 7 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 7 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 5.95 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 5.25 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 4.55 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Format/Documentation 7 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 7 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 5.95 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 5.25 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 4.55 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 70 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.