assessment

Rosi_226

PSY-402Rubric-Benchmark-ArticleReview.pdf

Home >Psychology homework help >assessment

Benchmark - Article Review - Rubric

Area of Interest 10.5 points

Criteria Description

Identification of area of problem solving, decision making, or an intelligence theory

selected for Article Review.

5. Target 10.5 points

An identification of area of problem solving, decision making, or an intelligence

theory selected for Article Review is present.

4. Acceptable 8.92 points

N/A

3. Approaching 7.88 points

N/A

2. Insufficient 6.83 points

N/A

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An identification of area of problem solving, decision making, or an intelligence

theory selected for Article Review is missing.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Article Details 10.5 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of how article selected connects to area of interest, confirmation of the

article meets requirements as outlined, incorporation of literature review and

hypothesis, including link to article.

5. Target 10.5 points

An explanation of how article selected connects to area of interest, confirmation of

the article meets requirements as outlined, including link, is thorough and accurate.

4. Acceptable 8.92 points

An explanation of how article selected connects to area of interest, confirmation of

the article meets requirements as outlined, including link, is present with few

errors.

3. Approaching 7.88 points

An explanation of how article selected connects to area of interest, confirmation of

the article meets requirements as outlined, including link, is present, but lacks

detail.

2. Insufficient 6.83 points

An explanation of how article selected connects to area of interest, confirmation of

the article meets requirements as outlined, including link, is incomplete or

inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An explanation of how article selected connects to area of interest, confirmation of

the article meets requirements as outlined, including link, is missing.

https://www.gce.com/

Thesis, Position, or Purpose 10.5 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 10.5 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable 8.92 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

appropriate audience is demonstrated.

3. Approaching 7.88 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

2. Insufficient 6.83 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

awareness of the intended audience.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

audience is evident.

https://www.gce.com/

Method and Participants 10.5 points

Criteria Description

Description of the basics of how the study was conducted, what procedures were used,

and identification of the participants.

5. Target 10.5 points

A description of the basics of how the study was conducted, what procedures were

used, and identification of the participants is thorough and accurate.

4. Acceptable 8.92 points

A description of the basics of how the study was conducted, what procedures were

used, and identification of the participants is present with few errors.

3. Approaching 7.88 points

A description of the basics of how the study was conducted, what procedures were

used, and identification of the participants is present, but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 6.83 points

A description of the basics of how the study was conducted, what procedures were

used, and identification of the participants is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A description of the basics of how the study was conducted, what procedures were

used, and identification of the participants is missing.

https://www.gce.com/

Major Findings and Conclusions 13.5 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of major findings and conclusion.

5. Target 13.5 points

An explanation of major findings and conclusion is thorough and accurate.

4. Acceptable 11.48 points

An explanation of major findings and conclusion is present with few errors.

3. Approaching 10.13 points

An explanation of major findings and conclusion is present, but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 8.78 points

An explanation of major findings and conclusion is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An explanation of major findings and conclusion is missing.

https://www.gce.com/

Strengths and Limitations 13.5 points

Criteria Description

Analysis of one strength and limitation present in the study.

5. Target 13.5 points

An analysis of one strength and limitation present in the study is thorough and

accurate.

4. Acceptable 11.48 points

An analysis of one strength and limitation present in the study is present with few

errors.

3. Approaching 10.13 points

An analysis of one strength and limitation present in the study is present, but lacks

detail.

2. Insufficient 8.78 points

An analysis of one strength and limitation present in the study is incomplete or

inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An analysis of one strength and limitation present in the study is missing.

https://www.gce.com/

Implication of the Field (B) 18 points

Criteria Description

Analysis of how study results can be applied. (C4.4)

5. Target 18 points

An analysis of how study results can be applied is thorough and accurate.

4. Acceptable 15.3 points

An analysis of how study results can be applied is present with few errors.

3. Approaching 13.5 points

An analysis of how study results can be applied is present, but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 11.7 points

An analysis of how study results can be applied is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An analysis of how study results can be applied is missing.

https://www.gce.com/

Benefits of Findings 13.5 points

Criteria Description

Evaluation of how psychology, education, and counseling professionals benefit from

the findings.

5. Target 13.5 points

An evaluation of how psychology, education, and counseling professionals benefit

from the findings is thorough and accurate.

4. Acceptable 11.48 points

An evaluation of how psychology, education, and counseling professionals benefit

from the findings is present with few errors.

3. Approaching 10.13 points

An evaluation of how psychology, education, and counseling professionals benefit

from the findings is present, but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 8.78 points

An evaluation of how psychology, education, and counseling professionals benefit

from the findings is incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An evaluation of how psychology, education, and counseling professionals benefit

from the findings is missing.

https://www.gce.com/

Big Take Away 13.5 points

Criteria Description