Psychology final assignment

Rosi_226

PSY-362Rubric-ProsocialBehavior-Online_TradonlineObj.8.3.pdf

Home >Psychology homework help >Psychology final assignment

Prosocial Behavior - Online/Tradonline (Obj. 8.3) - Rubric

Implementation of acts of kindness 15 points

Criteria Description

Describe your implementation of acts of kindness, others’ reactions, and your own

feelings.

5. Target 15 points

Worksheet expertly describes one’s implementation of acts of kindness and

reactions from others and themselves. Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Worksheet clearly identifies describes one’s implementation of acts of kindness and

reactions from others and themselves. Worksheet demonstrates an understanding

that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Worksheet adequately describes one’s implementation of acts of kindness and

reactions from others and themselves. Worksheet demonstrates a basic

understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Worksheet inadequately describes one’s implementation of acts of kindness and

reactions from others and themselves. Worksheet demonstrates a poor

understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Worksheet omits or incompletely describes one’s implementation of acts of

kindness and reactions from others and themselves. Worksheet does not

demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Motivations for prosocial behavior 15 points

Criteria Description

Explain how social exchange theory, social norms, and reciprocal altruism predicts

one’s behavior.

5. Target 15 points

Worksheet expertly incompletely explains how social exchange theory, social

norms, and reciprocal altruism predicts one’s behavior. Worksheet demonstrates

an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Worksheet clearly incompletely explains how social exchange theory, social norms,

and reciprocal altruism predicts one’s behavior. Worksheet demonstrates an

understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Worksheet adequately incompletely explains how social exchange theory, social

norms, and reciprocal predicts one’s behavior. Worksheet demonstrates a basic

understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Worksheet incompletely explains how social exchange theory, social norms, and

reciprocal altruism predicts one’s behavior. Worksheet demonstrates a poor

understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Worksheet omits or incompletely explains how social exchange theory, social

norms, and reciprocal altruism predicts one’s behavior. Worksheet does not

demonstrate understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Theoretical frameworks for altruism 15 points

Criteria Description

Compare negative state relief model with the empathy-altruism model, offering

examples of which is more prevalent in one’s life.

5. Target 15 points

Worksheet expertly compares the negative state relief model with the empathy-

altruism model, expertly offering examples of which is more prevalent in one’s life.

Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Worksheet clearly compares the negative state relief model with the empathy-

altruism model, clearly offering examples of which is more prevalent in one’s life.

Worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the

topic.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Worksheet adequately compares the negative state relief model with the empathy-

altruism model, adequately offering examples of which is more prevalent in one’s

life. Worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Worksheet incompletely compares the negative state relief model with the

empathy-altruism model, and inadequately offers examples of which is more

prevalent in one’s life. Worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Worksheet omits or incompletely compares the negative state relief model with the

empathy-altruism model and does not offer examples of which is more prevalent in

one’s life. Worksheet does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Applying faith and worldview to social responsibility 15 points

Criteria Description

Assess the role of faith and social responsibility norms within the context of one’s own

behavior.

5. Target 15 points

Worksheet expertly assesses the role of faith and social responsibility norms within

the context of one’s own behavior. Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Worksheet clearly assesses the role of faith and social responsibility norms within

the context of one’s own behavior. Worksheet demonstrates an understanding that

extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Worksheet adequately assesses the role of faith and social responsibility norms

within the context of one’s own behavior. Worksheet demonstrates a basic

understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Worksheet inadequately assesses the role of faith and social responsibility norms

within the context of one’s own behavior. Worksheet demonstrates a poor

understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Worksheet omits or incompletely assesses the role of faith and social responsibility

norms within the context of one’s own behavior. Worksheet does not demonstrate

understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Prosocial behavior and servant leadership 20 points

Criteria Description

Apply prosocial behavior concepts to servant leadership.

5. Target 20 points

Worksheet expertly applies prosocial behavior concepts to servant leadership.

Worksheet demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 17 points

Worksheet clearly applies prosocial behavior concepts to servant leadership.

Worksheet demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the

topic.

3. Approaching 15 points

Worksheet adequately applies prosocial behavior concepts to servant leadership.

Worksheet demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 13 points

Worksheet inadequately applies prosocial behavior concepts to servant leadership.

Worksheet demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Worksheet omits or incompletely applies prosocial behavior concepts to servant

leadership. Worksheet does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Evidence 10 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purposes; considers

other perspectives.

5. Target 10 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are

clearly considered.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or

integration of other perspectives is present.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is

superficial or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies

entirely on the perspective of the writer.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

https://www.gce.com/

Format/Documentation 5 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of

direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 100 points

https://www.gce.com/