Study

Rosi_226

PSY-362Rubric-FBIConsultantPresentationObjs.4.1-4.3.pdf

Home >Psychology homework help >Study

FBI Consultant Presentation (Objs. 4.1- 4.3) - Rubric

Summary of Experiment 10 points

Criteria Description

Provide a summary of the Stanford Prison Study. Identify the goal of the study,

research methods, population used, and so forth.

5. Target 10 points

PPT expertly provides a summary of the study. PPT demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

PPT clearly provides a summary of the study. PPT demonstrates a clear

understanding of the topic.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

PPT adequately provides a summary of the study. PPT demonstrates a basic

understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

PPT inadequately provides a summary of the study. PPT demonstrates a poor

understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

PPT omits or incompletely provides a summary of the study. PPT does not

demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Implicit Expectations 10 points

Criteria Description

Identify and explain at least three examples of implicit expectations in the study.

5. Target 10 points

PPT expertly provides examples of implicit expectations. PPT demonstrates an

exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

PPT clearly provides examples of implicit expectations. PPT demonstrates a clear

understanding of the topic.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

PPT adequately provides examples of implicit expectations. PPT demonstrates a

basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

PPT inadequately provides examples of implicit expectations. PPT demonstrates a

poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

PPT omits or incompletely provides examples of implicit expectations. PPT does not

demonstrate understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Explicit Expectations 15 points

Criteria Description

Identify and explain at least three examples of explicit expectations in the study.

5. Target 15 points

PPT expertly provides examples of explicit expectations. PPT demonstrates an

exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

PPT clearly provides examples of explicit expectations. PPT demonstrates a clear

understanding of the topic.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

PPT adequately provides examples of explicit expectations. PPT demonstrates a

basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

PPT inadequately provides examples of explicit expectations. PPT demonstrates a

poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

PPT omits or incompletely provides examples of explicit expectations. PPT does not

demonstrate understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Deindividuation, Disinhibition, and Anonymity 15 points

Criteria Description

Assess the role of deindividuation, disinhibition, and anonymity in the participants’

behavior.

5. Target 15 points

PPT expertly assesses the role of deindividuation, disinhibition and anonymity in

participant behavior. PPT demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

PPT clearly assesses the role of deindividuation, disinhibition and anonymity in

participant behavior. PPT demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

PPT adequately assesses the role of deindividuation, disinhibition and anonymity in

participant behavior. PPT demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

PPT inadequately assesses the role of deindividuation, disinhibition and anonymity

in participant behavior. PPT demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

PPT omits or incompletely assesses the role of deindividuation, disinhibition and

anonymity in participant behavior. PPT does not demonstrate understanding of the

topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Relationship between Group and Individual Behavior 10 points

Criteria Description

Explain ways in which the group affected individuals’ behavior, and ways in which

individuals affected the group’s behavior.

5. Target 10 points

PPT expertly explains the relationship between participants’ individual and group

behavior. PPT demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

PPT clearly explains the relationship between participants’ individual and group

behavior. PPT demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

PPT adequately explains the relationship between participants’ individual and group

behavior. PPT demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

PPT inadequately explains the relationship between participants’ individual and

group behavior. PPT demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

PPT omits or incompletely explains the relationship between participants’ individual

and group behavior. PPT does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Cognitive Dissonance 10 points

Criteria Description

Offer examples of cognitive dissonance in the study, and explain how it played a role in

participants’ experience in the study.

5. Target 10 points

PPT expertly provides examples of cognitive dissonance in relationship to

participants’ experience in the study. PPT demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

PPT clearly provides examples of cognitive dissonance in relationship to

participants’ experience in the study. PPT demonstrates a clear understanding of

the topic.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

PPT adequately provides examples of cognitive dissonance in relationship to

participants’ experience in the study. PPT demonstrates a basic understanding of

the topic.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

PPT inadequately provides examples of cognitive dissonance in relationship to

participants’ experience in the study. PPT demonstrates a poor understanding of

the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

PPT omits or incompletely provides examples of cognitive dissonance in

relationship to participants’ experience in the study. PPT does not demonstrate

understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Ethical Concerns 10 points

Criteria Description

Discuss how this study is different than other major studies conducted on obedience

(i.e. Asch conformity study, Milgrim experiment, etc.). Identify for your audience the

major ethical concerns as a result of this study,

5. Target 10 points

PPT expertly discusses ethical factors and comparison with similar studies. PPT

demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

PPT clearly discusses ethical factors and comparison with similar studies. PPT

demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

PPT adequately discusses ethical factors and comparison with similar studies. PPT

demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

PPT inadequately discusses ethical factors and comparison with similar studies. PPT

demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

PPT omits or incompletely discusses ethical factors and comparison with similar

studies. PPT does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Presentation of Content 5 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Target 5 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to

each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers.

The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting

information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Presentation includes

persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some

inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong

sense of purpose. Presentation includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information.

Presentation includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

https://www.gce.com/

Layout 5 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Target 5 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with

appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in

length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance

the readability of the text.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to

be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for

headings and text.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the

fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long

paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with

large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult

due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background,

overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and

subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with

long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors.

Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

https://www.gce.com/

Language Use and Audience Awareness 2 points

Criteria Description

Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.

5. Target 2 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word

choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline,

and scope.

4. Acceptable 1.7 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for

the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3. Approaching 1.5 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Insufficient 1.3 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are

present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech

appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer

appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either

does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 3 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 3 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 2.55 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 2.25 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 1.95 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

https://www.gce.com/

Format/Documentation 5 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 100 points

https://www.gce.com/