Study

Rosi_226

PSY-362Rubric-Benchmark-The_Authentic_SelfObjs.2.1-2.3.pdf

Home >Psychology homework help >Study

Benchmark - The "Authentic" Self (Objs. 2.1-2.3) - Rubric

Cultural, Spiritual and Individual In�uence on the Social Self (B) 25 points

Criteria Description

Explain how the development of your social self and behaviors are influenced by

cultural, spiritual, and individual factors. (C1.1)

5. Target 25 points

The paper expertly explains how the development of your social self and behaviors

are influenced by cultural, spiritual, and individual factors. The paper demonstrates

an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 21.25 points

The paper clearly explains how the development of your social self and behaviors

are influenced by cultural, spiritual, and individual factors. The paper demonstrates

an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 18.75 points

The paper adequately explains how the development of your social self and

behaviors are influenced by cultural, spiritual, and individual factors. The paper

demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 16.25 points

The paper inadequately explains how the development of your social self and

behaviors are influenced by cultural, spiritual, and individual factors. The paper

demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The paper omits or incompletely explains how the development of your social self

and behaviors are influenced by cultural, spiritual, and individual factors. The paper

does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Social Media and the Social Self 25 points

Criteria Description

Describe how the chosen social media platform illustrates elements of the social self.

Offer specific examples from your chosen platform and provide scholarly resources to

support your writing.

5. Target 25 points

The paper expertly describes how the chosen social media platform illustrates

elements of the social self. The specific examples from the chosen platform and

scholarly resources provided in support are excellent. The paper demonstrates an

exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 21.25 points

The paper clearly describes how the chosen social media platform illustrates

elements of the social self. The specific examples from the chosen platform and

scholarly resources provided in support are good. The paper demonstrates an

understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 18.75 points

The paper adequately describes how the chosen social media platform illustrates

elements of the social self. The specific examples from the chosen platform and

scholarly resources provided in support are adequate. The paper demonstrates a

basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 16.25 points

The paper inadequately describes how the chosen social media platform illustrates

elements of the social self. The specific examples from the chosen platform and

scholarly resources provided in support are insufficient. The paper demonstrates a

poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The paper omits or incompletely describes how the chosen social media platform

illustrates elements of the social self. No specific examples from the chosen

platform nor scholarly resources in support are provided. The paper does not

demonstrate understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Impression Management Techniques 30 points

Criteria Description

Explains at least three examples of how impression management techniques were

illustrates in the chosen social media platform. Relate nonverbal signals to your own

first impressions.

5. Target 30 points

The paper expertly explains examples of how impression management techniques

were illustrated, and nonverbal signals contributing to first impressions. The paper

demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 25.5 points

The paper clearly explains examples of how impression management techniques

were illustrated, and nonverbal signals contributing to first impressions. The paper

demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 22.5 points

The paper adequately explains examples of how impression management

techniques were illustrated, and nonverbal signals contributing to first impressions.

The paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 19.5 points

The paper inadequately explains examples of how impression management

techniques were illustrated, and nonverbal signals contributing to first impressions.

The paper demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The paper omits or incompletely explains examples of how impression

management techniques were illustrated, and nonverbal signals contributing to

first impressions. The paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Thesis, Position, or Purpose 5 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 5 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

appropriate audience is demonstrated.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

awareness of the intended audience.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

audience is evident.

https://www.gce.com/

Development, Structure, and Conclusion 5 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves

from development.

5. Target 5 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression

of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the

development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on

each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are

inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic

and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some

organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and

not supported by the overall development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections

between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

https://www.gce.com/

Evidence 4 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers

other perspectives.

5. Target 4 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are

clearly considered.

4. Acceptable 3.4 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

3. Approaching 3 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or

integration of other perspectives is present.

2. Insufficient 2.6 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is

superficial or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies

entirely on the perspective of the writer.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 4 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 3.4 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 3 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 2.6 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

https://www.gce.com/

Format/Documentation 2 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 2 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 1.7 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 1.5 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 1.3 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 100 points

https://www.gce.com/