Psychology assignment

Rosi_226

PSY-362Rubric-Benchmark-AdvocacyPlanEssayObjs.6.1-6.4.pdf

Home >Psychology homework help >Psychology assignment

Benchmark - Advocacy Plan Essay (Objs. 6.1-6.4) - Rubric

Description of advocacy plan, logistics, and bene�ts 20 points

Criteria Description

Describes a unique advocacy plan, logistics, and benefits for the chosen population.

5. Target 20 points

The paper expertly describes a unique advocacy plan, logistics, and benefits for the

chosen population. The paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the

topic.

4. Acceptable 17 points

The paper clearly describes a unique advocacy plan, logistics, and benefits for the

chosen population. The paper demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond

the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 15 points

The paper adequately describes a unique advocacy plan, logistics, and benefits for

the chosen population. The paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 13 points

The paper inadequately describes a unique advocacy plan, logistics, and benefits for

the chosen population. The paper demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The paper omits or incompletely describes a unique advocacy plan, logistics, and

benefits for the chosen population. The paper does not demonstrate understanding

of the topic.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

How the plan addresses stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination 20 points

Criteria Description

Distinguish between stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination. Identify how the plan

will address these concepts for the chosen group.

5. Target 20 points

The paper expertly distinguishes between stereotypes, prejudice, and

discrimination. The paper expertly discusses how the plan will address these

concepts for the chosen group. The paper demonstrates an exceptional

understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 17 points

The paper clearly distinguishes between stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination.

The paper clearly discusses how the plan will address these concepts for the chosen

group. The paper demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface

of the topic.

3. Approaching 15 points

The paper adequately distinguishes between stereotypes, prejudice, and

discrimination. The paper adequately discusses how the plan will address these

concepts for the chosen group. The paper demonstrates a basic understanding of

the topic.

2. Insufficient 13 points

The paper inadequately distinguishes between stereotypes, prejudice, and

discrimination. The paper inadequately discusses how the plan will address these

concepts for the chosen group. The paper demonstrates a poor understanding of

the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The paper omits or incompletely distinguishes between stereotypes, prejudice, and

discrimination. The paper omits or incompletely how the plan will address these

concepts for the chosen group. The paper does not demonstrate understanding of

the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Social and cultural reinforcers of stereotypes, prejudice, and

discrimination 20 points

Criteria Description

Explain how stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination are reinforced by social/cultural

factors and how the plan addresses these factors.

5. Target 20 points

The paper expertly explains how stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination are

reinforced by social/cultural factors and how the plan addresses these factors. The

paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 17 points

The paper clearly explains how stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination are

reinforced by social/cultural factors and how the plan addresses these factors. The

paper demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the

topic.

3. Approaching 15 points

The paper adequately explains how stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination are

reinforced by social/cultural factors and how the plan addresses these factors. The

paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 13 points

The paper explains how stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination are reinforced

by social/cultural factors and how the plan addresses these factors. The paper

demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The paper omits or incompletely explains how stereotypes, prejudice, and

discrimination are reinforced by social/cultural factors and how the plan addresses

these factors. The paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Applying GCU’s Statement on Christianity, Race, and Ethnicity (B) 20 points

Criteria Description

Apply how GCU’s Statement on Christianity, Race, and Ethnicity actively fights against

the causes of prejudicial attitudes and discrimination, as well as your personal role in

fighting such attitudes. (C3.3)

5. Target 20 points

The paper expertly applies how GCU’s Statement on Christianity, Race, and Ethnicity

actively fights against the causes of prejudicial attitudes and discrimination, as well

as your personal role in fighting such attitudes. The paper demonstrates an

exceptional understanding of the topic.

4. Acceptable 17 points

The paper clearly applies how GCU’s Statement on Christianity, Race, and Ethnicity

actively fights against the causes of prejudicial attitudes and discrimination, as well

as your personal role in fighting such attitudes. The paper demonstrates an

understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

3. Approaching 15 points

The paper adequately applies how GCU’s Statement on Christianity, Race, and

Ethnicity actively fights against the causes of prejudicial attitudes and

discrimination, as well as your personal role in fighting such attitudes. The paper

demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

2. Insufficient 13 points

The paper inadequately applies how GCU’s Statement on Christianity, Race, and

Ethnicity actively fights against the causes of prejudicial attitudes and

discrimination, as well as your personal role in fighting such attitudes. The paper

demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The paper omits or incompletely applies how GCU’s Statement on Christianity, Race,

and Ethnicity actively fights against the causes of prejudicial attitudes and

discrimination, as well as your personal role in fighting such attitudes. The paper

does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

https://www.gce.com/

Thesis, Position, or Purpose 5 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 5 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

appropriate audience is demonstrated.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

awareness of the intended audience.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

audience is evident.

https://www.gce.com/

Development, Structure, and Conclusion 5 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves

from development.

5. Target 5 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression

of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the

development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable 4.25 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on

each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching 3.75 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are

inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic

and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient 3.25 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some

organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and

not supported by the overall development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections

between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

https://www.gce.com/

Evidence 4 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers

other perspectives.

5. Target 4 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are

clearly considered.

4. Acceptable 3.4 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

3. Approaching 3 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or

integration of other perspectives is present.

2. Insufficient 2.6 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is

superficial or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies

entirely on the perspective of the writer.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 4 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 3.4 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 3 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 2.6 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

https://www.gce.com/

Format/Documentation 2 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 2 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 1.7 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 1.5 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 1.3 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 100 points

https://www.gce.com/